Benefit of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation-based Therapy in a Real-world Setting: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.014
Ronald Kool, Alice Dragomir, Girish S Kulkarni, Gautier Marcq, Rodney H Breau, Michael Kim, Ionut Busca, Hamidreza Abdi, Mark Dawidek, Michael Uy, Gagan Fervaha, Fabio L Cury, Nimira Alimohamed, Jonathan Izawa, Claudio Jeldres, Ricardo Rendon, Bobby Shayegan, Robert Siemens, Peter C Black, Wassim Kassouf
{"title":"Benefit of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation-based Therapy in a Real-world Setting: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis.","authors":"Ronald Kool, Alice Dragomir, Girish S Kulkarni, Gautier Marcq, Rodney H Breau, Michael Kim, Ionut Busca, Hamidreza Abdi, Mark Dawidek, Michael Uy, Gagan Fervaha, Fabio L Cury, Nimira Alimohamed, Jonathan Izawa, Claudio Jeldres, Ricardo Rendon, Bobby Shayegan, Robert Siemens, Peter C Black, Wassim Kassouf","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy. Studies on the potential benefit of NAC before radiation-based therapy (RT) are conflicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of NAC on patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent RT in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 785 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were classified into two treatment groups based on the administration of NAC before RT (NAC vs no NAC).</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: </strong>The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with absolute standardized differences (ASDs) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. The impact of NAC on complete response, overall, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RT in the weighted cohort was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>After applying the exclusion criteria, 586 patients were included; 102 (17%) received NAC before RT. Patients in the NAC subgroup were younger (mean age 65 vs 77 yr; ASD 1.20); more likely to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (87% vs 78%; ASD 0.28), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 20%; ASD 0.27), higher cT stage (cT3-4 in 29% vs 20%; ASD 0.21), and higher cN stage (cN1-2 in 32% vs 4%; ASD 0.81); and more commonly treated with concurrent chemotherapy (79% vs 67%; ASD 0.28). After IPTW, NAC versus no NAC cohorts were well balanced (ASD <0.20) for all included covariates. NAC was significantly associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.56; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005). This study was limited by potential occult imbalances across treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If tolerated, NAC might be associated with improved survival and should be considered for eligible patients with MIBC planning to undergo bladder preservation with RT. Prospective trials are warranted.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this study, we showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be associated with improved survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who elect for curative-intent radiation-based therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1350-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy. Studies on the potential benefit of NAC before radiation-based therapy (RT) are conflicting.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of NAC on patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent RT in a real-world setting.

Design, setting, and participants: The study cohort consisted of 785 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were classified into two treatment groups based on the administration of NAC before RT (NAC vs no NAC).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with absolute standardized differences (ASDs) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. The impact of NAC on complete response, overall, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RT in the weighted cohort was analyzed.

Results and limitations: After applying the exclusion criteria, 586 patients were included; 102 (17%) received NAC before RT. Patients in the NAC subgroup were younger (mean age 65 vs 77 yr; ASD 1.20); more likely to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (87% vs 78%; ASD 0.28), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 20%; ASD 0.27), higher cT stage (cT3-4 in 29% vs 20%; ASD 0.21), and higher cN stage (cN1-2 in 32% vs 4%; ASD 0.81); and more commonly treated with concurrent chemotherapy (79% vs 67%; ASD 0.28). After IPTW, NAC versus no NAC cohorts were well balanced (ASD <0.20) for all included covariates. NAC was significantly associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.56; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005). This study was limited by potential occult imbalances across treatment groups.

Conclusions: If tolerated, NAC might be associated with improved survival and should be considered for eligible patients with MIBC planning to undergo bladder preservation with RT. Prospective trials are warranted.

Patient summary: In this study, we showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be associated with improved survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who elect for curative-intent radiation-based therapy.

在真实世界环境中,以顺铂为基础的新辅助化疗对接受放射治疗的浸润性膀胱癌患者的益处:逆概率治疗加权分析》。
背景:新辅助化疗(NAC)可提高接受根治性膀胱切除术的肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的生存率。关于新辅助化疗在放射治疗(RT)前的潜在益处的研究相互矛盾:目的:在真实世界中评估NAC对接受根治性RT治疗的肌浸润性膀胱癌患者的影响:研究队列包括在加拿大各地学术中心接受 RT 治疗的 785 例 MIBC(cT2-4aN0-2M0)患者。根据患者在接受 RT 治疗前是否服用 NAC(服用 NAC 与不服用 NAC),将其分为两个治疗组:结果测量和统计分析:采用绝对标准化差异(ASD)的逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)来平衡各治疗组的协变量。在加权队列中,分析了NAC对RT后完全反应、总生存率和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)的影响:应用排除标准后,共纳入 586 例患者;其中 102 例(17%)在 RT 前接受了 NAC 治疗。NAC亚组患者更年轻(平均年龄为65岁 vs 77岁;ASD为1.20);更有可能出现东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态0-1(87% vs 78%;ASD为0.28)、淋巴管侵犯(32% vs 20%;ASD为0.27)、较高的 cT 分期(29% 对 20%,cT3-4;ASD 0.21)和较高的 cN 分期(32% 对 4%,cN1-2;ASD 0.81);并且更常接受同期化疗(79% 对 67%;ASD 0.28)。IPTW治疗后,NAC与无NAC治疗组之间的平衡性良好(ASD结论):如果可以耐受,NAC可能与生存率的提高有关,计划接受保留膀胱RT治疗的符合条件的MIBC患者应考虑NAC。患者总结:在这项研究中,我们发现新辅助化疗可能与选择根治性放疗的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者生存率的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信