Impact of low dose superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast conserving treatment on susceptibility artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced mammography

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Elisabeth R.M. van Haaren , Merel A. Spiekerman van Weezelenburg , James van Bastelaar , Alfred Janssen , Thiemo van Nijnatten , Lee H. Bouwman , Yvonne L.J. Vissers , Marc B.I. Lobbes
{"title":"Impact of low dose superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast conserving treatment on susceptibility artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced mammography","authors":"Elisabeth R.M. van Haaren ,&nbsp;Merel A. Spiekerman van Weezelenburg ,&nbsp;James van Bastelaar ,&nbsp;Alfred Janssen ,&nbsp;Thiemo van Nijnatten ,&nbsp;Lee H. Bouwman ,&nbsp;Yvonne L.J. Vissers ,&nbsp;Marc B.I. Lobbes","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Residual particles of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) tracer, used for sentinel node biopsy, cause susceptibility artefacts on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). We investigated the impact of these artefacts on the imaging quality of MRI and explored whether contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) could be an alternative in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data on patients’ characteristics, injection site, presence, size (mm) of artefacts on full-field digital mammography (FFDM)/CEM, MRI after 1 ml SPIO was recorded. Image quality scored by two breast radiologists using a 4-point Likert system: 0: no artefacts 1: good diagnostic quality 2: impaired but still readable 3: hampered clinical assessment. Continuous variables reported as means and standard deviations (SD), categorical variables as count and percentage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On FFDM/CEM, performed 13 months postoperatively, no iron SPIO particles were detected, with a Likert score of 0. In all MRI (100%) images, executed at 16.6 months after SPIO injection, susceptibility artefacts at the injection sites i.e., retroareolair and lateral quadrant were observed with a mean size of 41.9 ± 9.8 mm (SD) by observer 1, and 44.8 ± 12.5 mm (SD) by observer 2, independent of the injection site. Both observers scored a Likert score of 2: locally impaired on all MRI images and sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Even 1 ml SPIO tracer used for sentinel node procedure impairs the evaluation of breast MRI at the tracer injection site beyond one year of follow-up. No impairment was observed on FFDM/CEM, suggesting that CEM might be a reliable alternative to breast MRI if required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Residual particles of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) tracer, used for sentinel node biopsy, cause susceptibility artefacts on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). We investigated the impact of these artefacts on the imaging quality of MRI and explored whether contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) could be an alternative in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Data on patients’ characteristics, injection site, presence, size (mm) of artefacts on full-field digital mammography (FFDM)/CEM, MRI after 1 ml SPIO was recorded. Image quality scored by two breast radiologists using a 4-point Likert system: 0: no artefacts 1: good diagnostic quality 2: impaired but still readable 3: hampered clinical assessment. Continuous variables reported as means and standard deviations (SD), categorical variables as count and percentage.

Results

On FFDM/CEM, performed 13 months postoperatively, no iron SPIO particles were detected, with a Likert score of 0. In all MRI (100%) images, executed at 16.6 months after SPIO injection, susceptibility artefacts at the injection sites i.e., retroareolair and lateral quadrant were observed with a mean size of 41.9 ± 9.8 mm (SD) by observer 1, and 44.8 ± 12.5 mm (SD) by observer 2, independent of the injection site. Both observers scored a Likert score of 2: locally impaired on all MRI images and sequences.

Conclusions

Even 1 ml SPIO tracer used for sentinel node procedure impairs the evaluation of breast MRI at the tracer injection site beyond one year of follow-up. No impairment was observed on FFDM/CEM, suggesting that CEM might be a reliable alternative to breast MRI if required.

用于保乳治疗前哨节点活检的低剂量超顺磁性氧化铁示踪剂对磁共振成像和对比增强型乳腺 X 射线照相术中易感性伪影的影响
背景用于前哨节点活检的超顺磁性氧化铁(SPIO)示踪剂残留微粒会在乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)上造成感性伪影。我们研究了这些伪影对核磁共振成像质量的影响,并探讨了造影剂增强乳腺 X 线造影术(CEM)是否可作为乳腺癌患者随访的替代方法。材料和方法记录了患者特征、注射部位、存在情况、1 毫升 SPIO 后全场数字乳腺 X 线造影术(FFDM)/CEM 和核磁共振成像的伪影大小(毫米)等数据。图像质量由两名乳腺放射科医生使用 4 点 Likert 系统进行评分:0:无伪影 1:诊断质量良好 2:有缺陷但仍可读 3:妨碍临床评估。连续变量以平均值和标准差(SD)表示,分类变量以计数和百分比表示。结果在术后 13 个月进行的 FFDM/CEM 检查中,未检测到 SPIO 铁颗粒,Likert 评分为 0、观察者 1 的平均值为 41.9 ± 9.8 毫米(标清),观察者 2 的平均值为 44.8 ± 12.5 毫米(标清),与注射部位无关。结论即使是用于前哨节点手术的 1 毫升 SPIO 示踪剂也会在随访一年后影响示踪剂注射部位的乳腺 MRI 评估。在 FFDM/CEM 上未观察到损害,这表明如果需要,CEM 可能是乳腺 MRI 的可靠替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信