Teachers' mathematical problem posing: The role of processes and complexity levels in posing problems on the fraction part-whole concept

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Constantinos Christou, Demetra Pitta-Pantazi, Maria Chimoni
{"title":"Teachers' mathematical problem posing: The role of processes and complexity levels in posing problems on the fraction part-whole concept","authors":"Constantinos Christou,&nbsp;Demetra Pitta-Pantazi,&nbsp;Maria Chimoni","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study contributes to understanding the influence of different problem posing tasks on the performance of in-service teachers in posing important and worthwhile mathematical problems. The problem posing tasks pertain to the part-whole concept of fraction which presents ongoing challenges for teachers and students. The study sample was comprised of 40 in-service primary school teachers who completed an electronic problem posing test. The problem posing tasks included different problem situations and prompts that addressed: (a) four types of problem posing processes (editing, selecting, comprehending, and translating), and (b) four levels of complexity (uni-structural, multi-structural, relational, extended abstract). The results suggested that in-service teachers’ performance is mainly influenced by the process involved in a problem posing task, being higher in problem situations that are more closed structured compared to more open structured. The level of complexity was not found to influence in-service teachers’ performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312324000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study contributes to understanding the influence of different problem posing tasks on the performance of in-service teachers in posing important and worthwhile mathematical problems. The problem posing tasks pertain to the part-whole concept of fraction which presents ongoing challenges for teachers and students. The study sample was comprised of 40 in-service primary school teachers who completed an electronic problem posing test. The problem posing tasks included different problem situations and prompts that addressed: (a) four types of problem posing processes (editing, selecting, comprehending, and translating), and (b) four levels of complexity (uni-structural, multi-structural, relational, extended abstract). The results suggested that in-service teachers’ performance is mainly influenced by the process involved in a problem posing task, being higher in problem situations that are more closed structured compared to more open structured. The level of complexity was not found to influence in-service teachers’ performance.

教师提出数学问题:过程和复杂程度在提出分数部分-整体概念问题中的作用
本研究有助于了解不同的问题提出任务对在职教师提出重要而有价值的数学问题的表现的影响。提出的问题任务涉及分数的部分-整体概念,这给教师和学生带来了持续的挑战。研究样本由 40 名在职小学教师组成,他们完成了一项电子提出问题测试。提出问题的任务包括不同的问题情境和提示,涉及:(a) 四种提出问题的过程(编辑、选择、理解和翻译);(b) 四种复杂程度(单结构、多结构、关系、扩展抽象)。研究结果表明,在职教师的成绩主要受提出问题任务过程的影响,与开放式结构的问题情境相比,封闭式结构的问题情境中在职教师的成绩较高。复杂程度并不影响在职教师的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
Journal of Mathematical Behavior EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
17.60%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior solicits original research on the learning and teaching of mathematics. We are interested especially in basic research, research that aims to clarify, in detail and depth, how mathematical ideas develop in learners. Over three decades, our experience confirms a founding premise of this journal: that mathematical thinking, hence mathematics learning as a social enterprise, is special. It is special because mathematics is special, both logically and psychologically. Logically, through the way that mathematical ideas and methods have been built, refined and organized for centuries across a range of cultures; and psychologically, through the variety of ways people today, in many walks of life, make sense of mathematics, develop it, make it their own.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信