Enhancing critical thinking in medical education: A narrative review of current practices, challenges, and future perspectives in context of infodemics

Benoît Châlon , Romain Lutaud
{"title":"Enhancing critical thinking in medical education: A narrative review of current practices, challenges, and future perspectives in context of infodemics","authors":"Benoît Châlon ,&nbsp;Romain Lutaud","doi":"10.1016/j.lpmope.2024.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Covid-19 pandemic has been accompanied by a rampant spread of misinformation, posing significant risks to public health. This narrative review aims to assess the current state of critical thinking education in medical institutions, exploring its facilitators, barriers, and potential prospects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies. Six databases were searched using various keywords from 2007 to 2022, including articles in both English and French. The initial screening of abstracts and titles, as well as the subsequent full-text selection, were carried out through double reading. An inductive thematic approach was utilized for the analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 559 articles screened, 38 were included in this review. The selected articles exhibited considerable heterogeneity in terms of origin and study type. Following main themes emerged from the analysis: the challenge of defining critical thinking in the healthcare context, its integration into the curriculum, effective teaching methodologies, instructors' qualifications and approaches, methods for assessing its impact. Trainees reported a heightened sense of preparedness in navigating consultation situations impacted by controversies. They readily recognized the significance of cultivating critical thinking as an essential professional skill.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the post-COVID infodemic context, critical thinking in health education is gaining momentum, emphasizing both mindset and rational reasoning. This study provides a foundation for enhancing the implementation of critical thinking education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100860,"journal":{"name":"La Presse Médicale Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590250424000012/pdfft?md5=56de4a292ac8bd3d6498297fcad7d893&pid=1-s2.0-S2590250424000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Presse Médicale Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590250424000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Covid-19 pandemic has been accompanied by a rampant spread of misinformation, posing significant risks to public health. This narrative review aims to assess the current state of critical thinking education in medical institutions, exploring its facilitators, barriers, and potential prospects.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies. Six databases were searched using various keywords from 2007 to 2022, including articles in both English and French. The initial screening of abstracts and titles, as well as the subsequent full-text selection, were carried out through double reading. An inductive thematic approach was utilized for the analysis.

Results

Out of the 559 articles screened, 38 were included in this review. The selected articles exhibited considerable heterogeneity in terms of origin and study type. Following main themes emerged from the analysis: the challenge of defining critical thinking in the healthcare context, its integration into the curriculum, effective teaching methodologies, instructors' qualifications and approaches, methods for assessing its impact. Trainees reported a heightened sense of preparedness in navigating consultation situations impacted by controversies. They readily recognized the significance of cultivating critical thinking as an essential professional skill.

Conclusion

In the post-COVID infodemic context, critical thinking in health education is gaining momentum, emphasizing both mindset and rational reasoning. This study provides a foundation for enhancing the implementation of critical thinking education.

加强医学教育中的批判性思维:对信息教育学背景下的当前实践、挑战和未来前景的叙述性回顾
目的伴随着Covid-19大流行的是错误信息的肆意传播,给公众健康带来了巨大风险。本叙述性综述旨在评估医疗机构批判性思维教育的现状,探讨其促进因素、障碍和潜在前景。使用各种关键词检索了 2007 年至 2022 年期间的六个数据库,包括英语和法语文章。通过双重阅读对摘要和标题进行了初步筛选,并随后选择了全文。结果在筛选出的 559 篇文章中,有 38 篇被纳入本综述。所选文章在来源和研究类型方面表现出相当大的异质性。分析得出了以下主题:在医疗保健背景下定义批判性思维所面临的挑战、将批判性思维纳入课程、有效的教学方法、教员的资质和方法、评估批判性思维影响的方法。受训人员表示,在应对受争议影响的会诊情况时,他们有了更强的准备意识。他们欣然认识到培养批判性思维作为一项基本专业技能的重要意义。 结论在后 COVID 信息时代的背景下,批判性思维在健康教育中的发展势头日益强劲,强调思维方式和理性推理。本研究为加强批判性思维教育的实施奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信