How do SGLT2 inhibitors protect the kidney? A mediation analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Christoph Wanner, Masaomi Nangaku, Bettina J Kraus, Bernard Zinman, Michaela Mattheus, Stefan Hantel, Martin Schumacher, Kristin Ohneberg, Claudia Schmoor, Silvio E Inzucchi
{"title":"How do SGLT2 inhibitors protect the kidney? A mediation analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.","authors":"Christoph Wanner, Masaomi Nangaku, Bettina J Kraus, Bernard Zinman, Michaela Mattheus, Stefan Hantel, Martin Schumacher, Kristin Ohneberg, Claudia Schmoor, Silvio E Inzucchi","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfae032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanisms underlying kidney benefits with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition in heart failure and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D) with established cardiovascular disease are currently unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated post hoc the factors mediating the effect of empagliflozin on a composite kidney outcome (first sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥40% reduction from baseline, initiation of renal replacement therapy or death due to kidney disease) in EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients). Variables, calculated as change from baseline or updated mean, were evaluated as time-dependent covariates and using a landmark approach (at Week 12) in Cox regression analyses. In multivariable analyses, variables with the greatest mediating effect were added using a step-up procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In univariable time-dependent updated mean covariate analyses, the strongest mediator was hematocrit (99.5% mediation). Hemoglobin, uric acid and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio mediated 79.4%, 33.2% and 31.0%, respectively. Multivariable analyses were not performed due to the very strong mediation effect of hematocrit. In univariable Week 12 landmark change from baseline analyses, the strongest mediators included hematocrit (40.7%), glycated hemoglobin (28.3%), systolic blood pressure (16.8%) and free fatty acids (16.5%), which yielded a combined mediation of 78.9% in multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in hematocrit and hemoglobin were the strongest mediators of empagliflozin's kidney benefits in EMPA-REG OUTCOME participants with T2D and cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanisms underlying kidney benefits with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition in heart failure and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D) with established cardiovascular disease are currently unclear.

Methods: We evaluated post hoc the factors mediating the effect of empagliflozin on a composite kidney outcome (first sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥40% reduction from baseline, initiation of renal replacement therapy or death due to kidney disease) in EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients). Variables, calculated as change from baseline or updated mean, were evaluated as time-dependent covariates and using a landmark approach (at Week 12) in Cox regression analyses. In multivariable analyses, variables with the greatest mediating effect were added using a step-up procedure.

Results: In univariable time-dependent updated mean covariate analyses, the strongest mediator was hematocrit (99.5% mediation). Hemoglobin, uric acid and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio mediated 79.4%, 33.2% and 31.0%, respectively. Multivariable analyses were not performed due to the very strong mediation effect of hematocrit. In univariable Week 12 landmark change from baseline analyses, the strongest mediators included hematocrit (40.7%), glycated hemoglobin (28.3%), systolic blood pressure (16.8%) and free fatty acids (16.5%), which yielded a combined mediation of 78.9% in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: Changes in hematocrit and hemoglobin were the strongest mediators of empagliflozin's kidney benefits in EMPA-REG OUTCOME participants with T2D and cardiovascular disease.

SGLT2 抑制剂如何保护肾脏?EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验的中介分析。
简介:目前尚不清楚钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT2)抑制剂对心力衰竭和/或2型糖尿病(T2D)合并心血管疾病患者肾脏的益处机制:我们对EMPA-REG OUTCOME中empagliflozin对综合肾脏结果(首次持续估计肾小球滤过率从基线降低≥40%、开始肾脏替代治疗或因肾脏疾病死亡)的影响因素进行了事后评估。在 Cox 回归分析中,以基线或更新平均值变化计算的变量作为时间依赖性协变量,并采用地标方法(第 12 周)进行评估。在多变量分析中,使用阶跃程序添加了具有最大中介效应的变量:结果:在单变量时间依赖性更新平均协变量分析中,最强的中介变量是血细胞比容(99.5% 的中介作用)。血红蛋白、尿酸和尿白蛋白与肌酐的比率分别占 79.4%、33.2% 和 31.0%。由于血细胞比容的中介效应非常强,因此没有进行多变量分析。在单变量第 12 周与基线相比的地标变化分析中,最强的中介效应包括血细胞比容(40.7%)、糖化血红蛋白(28.3%)、收缩压(16.8%)和游离脂肪酸(16.5%),在多变量分析中,这些因素的综合中介效应为 78.9%:结论:在患有T2D和心血管疾病的EMPA-REG OUTCOME参与者中,血细胞比容和血红蛋白的变化是empagliflozin对肾脏益处的最强中介因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信