Spherization indices measured by resting SPECT improve risk stratification in patients with ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuting Zhao, Yingqi Hu, Yuanyuan Li, Yanhui Wang, Yuxin Xiao, Li Xu, Tailin Ren, Qiuyan Wu, Ruonan Wang, Zhifang Wu, Sijin Li, Ping Wu
{"title":"Spherization indices measured by resting SPECT improve risk stratification in patients with ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA).","authors":"Yuting Zhao, Yingqi Hu, Yuanyuan Li, Yanhui Wang, Yuxin Xiao, Li Xu, Tailin Ren, Qiuyan Wu, Ruonan Wang, Zhifang Wu, Sijin Li, Ping Wu","doi":"10.1186/s13550-024-01075-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is substantial, but its risk stratification has been suboptimal. Resting SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) could provide useful heart information including spherical indices. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of spherical indices in individuals with INOCA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 47.2 ± 20.8 months, 49 (17.2%) patients experienced major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Compared to those without MACE, those with MACE had a higher shape index (SI) (0.60 ± 0.07 vs. 0.58 ± 0.06; P = 0.028) and a lower E2 (eccentricity index calculated by the QPS) (0.81 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.04; P = 0.019). MACE event-free survival analysis revealed significant differences in the SI and E2 among all patients (all log-rank P < 0.01). Multivariate Cox analysis showed abnormal SI (HR: 2.73, 95% CI 1.44-5.18, P = 0.002) and E2 (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.08-3.48, P = 0.026) were both independent predictors for MACE when they were put into the same model, respectively. The incorporation of the SI into the baseline model demonstrated a significant improvement in the predictive accuracy for MACEs (P = 0.026), whereas E2 did not exhibit a similar improvement (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with INOCA, spherical indices (especially the SI) were associated with long-term MACE, which could be a preferable indicator for risk stratification and prognostic prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10850039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01075-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is substantial, but its risk stratification has been suboptimal. Resting SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) could provide useful heart information including spherical indices. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of spherical indices in individuals with INOCA.

Results: During a median follow-up of 47.2 ± 20.8 months, 49 (17.2%) patients experienced major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Compared to those without MACE, those with MACE had a higher shape index (SI) (0.60 ± 0.07 vs. 0.58 ± 0.06; P = 0.028) and a lower E2 (eccentricity index calculated by the QPS) (0.81 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.04; P = 0.019). MACE event-free survival analysis revealed significant differences in the SI and E2 among all patients (all log-rank P < 0.01). Multivariate Cox analysis showed abnormal SI (HR: 2.73, 95% CI 1.44-5.18, P = 0.002) and E2 (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.08-3.48, P = 0.026) were both independent predictors for MACE when they were put into the same model, respectively. The incorporation of the SI into the baseline model demonstrated a significant improvement in the predictive accuracy for MACEs (P = 0.026), whereas E2 did not exhibit a similar improvement (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: For patients with INOCA, spherical indices (especially the SI) were associated with long-term MACE, which could be a preferable indicator for risk stratification and prognostic prediction.

通过静息 SPECT 测量的匀浆指数可改善非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(INOCA)缺血患者的风险分层。
背景:非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病缺血(INOCA)的发病率很高,但其风险分层却不尽人意。静息 SPECT 心肌灌注成像(MPI)可提供有用的心脏信息,包括球形指数。我们的目的是评估球形指数在 INOCA 患者中的预后价值:在中位随访 47.2 ± 20.8 个月期间,49 例(17.2%)患者发生了重大心脏不良事件(MACE)。与未发生 MACE 的患者相比,发生 MACE 的患者形状指数 (SI) 较高(0.60 ± 0.07 vs. 0.58 ± 0.06;P = 0.028),E2(通过 QPS 计算的偏心指数)较低(0.81 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.04;P = 0.019)。MACE无事件生存分析显示,所有患者的SI和E2均存在显著差异(对数秩P均为0.05):结论:对于 INOCA 患者,球形指数(尤其是 SI)与长期 MACE 相关,可作为风险分层和预后预测的首选指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies. The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信