The probability of edge existence due to node degree: a baseline for network-based predictions.

IF 11.8 2区 生物学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Michael Zietz, Daniel S Himmelstein, Kyle Kloster, Christopher Williams, Michael W Nagle, Casey S Greene
{"title":"The probability of edge existence due to node degree: a baseline for network-based predictions.","authors":"Michael Zietz, Daniel S Himmelstein, Kyle Kloster, Christopher Williams, Michael W Nagle, Casey S Greene","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Important tasks in biomedical discovery such as predicting gene functions, gene-disease associations, and drug repurposing opportunities are often framed as network edge prediction. The number of edges connecting to a node, termed degree, can vary greatly across nodes in real biomedical networks, and the distribution of degrees varies between networks. If degree strongly influences edge prediction, then imbalance or bias in the distribution of degrees could lead to nonspecific or misleading predictions. We introduce a network permutation framework to quantify the effects of node degree on edge prediction. Our framework decomposes performance into the proportions attributable to degree and the network's specific connections using network permutation to generate features that depend only on degree. We discover that performance attributable to factors other than degree is often only a small portion of overall performance. Researchers seeking to predict new or missing edges in biological networks should use our permutation approach to obtain a baseline for performance that may be nonspecific because of degree. We released our methods as an open-source Python package (https://github.com/hetio/xswap/).</p>","PeriodicalId":12581,"journal":{"name":"GigaScience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10848215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GigaScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giae001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Important tasks in biomedical discovery such as predicting gene functions, gene-disease associations, and drug repurposing opportunities are often framed as network edge prediction. The number of edges connecting to a node, termed degree, can vary greatly across nodes in real biomedical networks, and the distribution of degrees varies between networks. If degree strongly influences edge prediction, then imbalance or bias in the distribution of degrees could lead to nonspecific or misleading predictions. We introduce a network permutation framework to quantify the effects of node degree on edge prediction. Our framework decomposes performance into the proportions attributable to degree and the network's specific connections using network permutation to generate features that depend only on degree. We discover that performance attributable to factors other than degree is often only a small portion of overall performance. Researchers seeking to predict new or missing edges in biological networks should use our permutation approach to obtain a baseline for performance that may be nonspecific because of degree. We released our methods as an open-source Python package (https://github.com/hetio/xswap/).

节点度导致边缘存在的概率:基于网络的预测基准。
生物医学发现中的重要任务,如预测基因功能、基因与疾病的关联以及药物再利用机会等,通常被归结为网络边缘预测。在真实的生物医学网络中,连接到节点的边的数量(称为度)在不同节点之间会有很大差异,而且不同网络之间的度的分布也各不相同。如果度数对边缘预测有很大影响,那么度数分布的不平衡或偏差可能会导致非特异性或误导性预测。我们引入了一个网络置换框架来量化节点度对边缘预测的影响。我们的框架将性能分解为可归因于度和网络特定连接的比例,使用网络置换生成仅依赖于度的特征。我们发现,节点度以外的因素通常只占整体性能的一小部分。寻求预测生物网络中新边缘或缺失边缘的研究人员应该使用我们的置换方法,以获得可能因程度而非特定的性能基线。我们以开源 Python 软件包的形式发布了我们的方法 (https://github.com/hetio/xswap/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GigaScience
GigaScience MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: GigaScience seeks to transform data dissemination and utilization in the life and biomedical sciences. As an online open-access open-data journal, it specializes in publishing "big-data" studies encompassing various fields. Its scope includes not only "omic" type data and the fields of high-throughput biology currently serviced by large public repositories, but also the growing range of more difficult-to-access data, such as imaging, neuroscience, ecology, cohort data, systems biology and other new types of large-scale shareable data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信