Emergency care capacity in Sierra Leone: A multicentre analysis

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Zosia Bredow , Zoe Corbett , Moses Mohamed Tarawally , Lucy Jackson , Foday Tejan Mansaray , Santigie Sesay , Andrew Leather
{"title":"Emergency care capacity in Sierra Leone: A multicentre analysis","authors":"Zosia Bredow ,&nbsp;Zoe Corbett ,&nbsp;Moses Mohamed Tarawally ,&nbsp;Lucy Jackson ,&nbsp;Foday Tejan Mansaray ,&nbsp;Santigie Sesay ,&nbsp;Andrew Leather","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Disease Control Priorities Project estimates that over 50 % of annual mortality in low- and middle-income countries can be addressed by improved emergency care. Sierra Leone's Ministry of Health and Sanitation has highlighted emergency care as a national priority. We conducted the first multicentre analysis of emergency care capacity in Sierra Leone, using the Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool (HEAT) to analyse 14 government hospitals across the country.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>HEAT is a standardised assessment that is recommended in the World Health Organisation Emergency Care Toolkit. It has been used comparably elsewhere. To analyse Sierra Leone's emergency care capacity with the HEAT data, we created the HEAT-adjusted Emergency Care Capacity Score. Purposeful sampling was used to select 14 government facilities nationwide. A multidisciplinary team was interviewed over a 2-day in-person visit to each facility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Human Resources was the strongest parameter, scoring 49 %. All hospitals provided emergency cover 24/7. Emergency Diagnostic Services was the most severely limited parameter, scoring 29 %. 3 hospitals had no access to basic radiography. Infrastructure scored 47 %. 2 hospitals had adequate electricity supply; 5 had adequate clean, running water. No hospitals had adequate oxygen supply. Clinical services scored 39 %. 10 hospitals had no designated Emergency Unit, only 2 triaged to stratify severity. Signal functions scored 38 %. No hospitals had reliable access to emergency drugs such as adrenaline. The total HEAT-adjusted Emergency Care Capacity Score across all hospitals was 40 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data identify gaps that have already led to local interventions, including focussing emergency resources to a resuscitation area, and training multidisciplinary teams in emergency care skills. This facility-level analysis could feed into wider assessment of Sierra Leone's emergency care systems at every level, which may help prioritise government strategy to target sustainable strengthening of national emergency care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 58-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X2400003X/pdfft?md5=64d6a42fd7211696a1b8acd92f0bebab&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X2400003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X2400003X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Disease Control Priorities Project estimates that over 50 % of annual mortality in low- and middle-income countries can be addressed by improved emergency care. Sierra Leone's Ministry of Health and Sanitation has highlighted emergency care as a national priority. We conducted the first multicentre analysis of emergency care capacity in Sierra Leone, using the Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool (HEAT) to analyse 14 government hospitals across the country.

Methods

HEAT is a standardised assessment that is recommended in the World Health Organisation Emergency Care Toolkit. It has been used comparably elsewhere. To analyse Sierra Leone's emergency care capacity with the HEAT data, we created the HEAT-adjusted Emergency Care Capacity Score. Purposeful sampling was used to select 14 government facilities nationwide. A multidisciplinary team was interviewed over a 2-day in-person visit to each facility.

Results

Human Resources was the strongest parameter, scoring 49 %. All hospitals provided emergency cover 24/7. Emergency Diagnostic Services was the most severely limited parameter, scoring 29 %. 3 hospitals had no access to basic radiography. Infrastructure scored 47 %. 2 hospitals had adequate electricity supply; 5 had adequate clean, running water. No hospitals had adequate oxygen supply. Clinical services scored 39 %. 10 hospitals had no designated Emergency Unit, only 2 triaged to stratify severity. Signal functions scored 38 %. No hospitals had reliable access to emergency drugs such as adrenaline. The total HEAT-adjusted Emergency Care Capacity Score across all hospitals was 40 %.

Conclusions

These data identify gaps that have already led to local interventions, including focussing emergency resources to a resuscitation area, and training multidisciplinary teams in emergency care skills. This facility-level analysis could feed into wider assessment of Sierra Leone's emergency care systems at every level, which may help prioritise government strategy to target sustainable strengthening of national emergency care.

塞拉利昂的急救能力:多中心分析
背景据疾病控制优先事项项目估计,在低收入和中等收入国家,每年有 50% 以上的死亡率可以通过改善急救护理来解决。塞拉利昂健康与卫生部已将急救护理列为国家优先事项。我们首次对塞拉利昂的急救能力进行了多中心分析,使用医院急救单位评估工具(HEAT)对全国 14 家政府医院进行了分析。该工具在其他地方也有类似应用。为了利用 HEAT 数据分析塞拉利昂的急救能力,我们创建了 HEAT 调整后急救能力评分。我们在全国范围内有目的地抽取了 14 家政府机构。结果人力资源是最重要的参数,得分率为 49%。所有医院都提供全天候急诊服务。紧急诊断服务是受限最严重的参数,得分率为 29%。有 3 家医院无法提供基本的放射检查服务。基础设施得分 47%。2 家医院有充足的电力供应;5 家医院有充足的清洁自来水。没有一家医院有充足的氧气供应。临床服务得分 39%。10 家医院没有指定的急诊室,只有 2 家医院按严重程度进行了分流。信号功能得分 38%。没有一家医院能够可靠地获得肾上腺素等急救药物。经 HEAT 调整后,所有医院的急救能力总得分为 40%。结论:这些数据找出了差距,并已在当地采取了干预措施,包括将急救资源集中到复苏区,以及对多学科团队进行急救技能培训。这一设施层面的分析可为塞拉利昂各级急救系统的更广泛评估提供信息,从而有助于确定政府战略的优先次序,以持续加强国家急救服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信