[Post-endodontic restoration: a direct or indirect restoration?]

M C F M de Kuijper, M M M Gresnigt
{"title":"[Post-endodontic restoration: a direct or indirect restoration?]","authors":"M C F M de Kuijper, M M M Gresnigt","doi":"10.5177/ntvt.2024.02.23049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When restoring an endodontically treated tooth, it is important to preserve the pericervical dentin so it is resistant especially to lateral forces occurring during mastication. When little pericervical dentin is seen to be present, an adhesive restoration is indicated. Tooth survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with adhesive direct and indirect restorations varies between 90.5% and 95.0% after 5 years. Deciding between a direct or an indirect restoration depends above all on the possibility to predictably restore the anatomy and on gloss retention. Because endodontically treated teeth are vulnerable to lateral forces, control of these forces after direct or indirect restoration is important. This can be achieved by a reduction in the steepness of the cuspal slope and/or by covering the cusps with the restorative material.</p>","PeriodicalId":74255,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","volume":"131 2","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.02.23049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When restoring an endodontically treated tooth, it is important to preserve the pericervical dentin so it is resistant especially to lateral forces occurring during mastication. When little pericervical dentin is seen to be present, an adhesive restoration is indicated. Tooth survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with adhesive direct and indirect restorations varies between 90.5% and 95.0% after 5 years. Deciding between a direct or an indirect restoration depends above all on the possibility to predictably restore the anatomy and on gloss retention. Because endodontically treated teeth are vulnerable to lateral forces, control of these forces after direct or indirect restoration is important. This can be achieved by a reduction in the steepness of the cuspal slope and/or by covering the cusps with the restorative material.

[根管治疗后修复:直接修复还是间接修复?]
在修复经过牙髓治疗的牙齿时,重要的是要保留牙颈周牙本质,使其特别能抵抗咀嚼时产生的侧向力。当发现牙颈周牙本质很少时,就需要进行粘接修复。使用粘接剂直接修复和间接修复进行牙髓治疗的牙齿在 5 年后的存活率在 90.5% 到 95.0% 之间。决定采用直接修复还是间接修复,首先要看是否可以预测修复的解剖结构和光泽度。由于牙髓治疗后的牙齿很容易受到侧向力的影响,因此在直接或间接修复后控制这些力是很重要的。这可以通过降低尖面坡度和/或用修复材料覆盖尖面来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信