Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2312258
Musa Çankaya, İlkim Çıtak Karakaya, Pelin Melda Yargıç
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.","authors":"Musa Çankaya, İlkim Çıtak Karakaya, Pelin Melda Yargıç","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2312258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale (PSS) in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to adapt it to Turkish.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A pilot study was conducted with 10 patients. 123 patients underwent PSS test-retest at 24-48 h intervals. Construct validity, correlations of PSS with other scales Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Stair Climbing and Descending Test (SCD), Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LDSS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index value of the scale was 0.95. The overall internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.88) was high. Item-total correlations of the scale were between 0.51 and 0.7. In the evaluation of the convergent validity of the PSS, it was found that there was a positive correlation between the PSSS and TUG and SCD, and a negative correlation between the PSS, TAS, LDSS and KOS-ADL (<i>p</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, it was determined that the PSSS scale had good internal consistency, test-retest validity and adequate construct validity when compared with the KOS-ADL, LDSS and AKPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5936-5943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2312258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale (PSS) in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to adapt it to Turkish.

Materials and methods: A pilot study was conducted with 10 patients. 123 patients underwent PSS test-retest at 24-48 h intervals. Construct validity, correlations of PSS with other scales Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Stair Climbing and Descending Test (SCD), Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LDSS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL) were evaluated.

Results: The content validity index value of the scale was 0.95. The overall internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.88) was high. Item-total correlations of the scale were between 0.51 and 0.7. In the evaluation of the convergent validity of the PSS, it was found that there was a positive correlation between the PSSS and TUG and SCD, and a negative correlation between the PSS, TAS, LDSS and KOS-ADL (p = 0.000).

Conclusions: In this study, it was determined that the PSSS scale had good internal consistency, test-retest validity and adequate construct validity when compared with the KOS-ADL, LDSS and AKPS.

土耳其版髌股关节疼痛严重程度量表在髌股关节疼痛综合征患者中的可靠性和有效性。
目的:本研究旨在调查髌骨股骨痛(PFP)患者髌骨股骨痛严重程度量表(PSS)在土耳其语中的有效性和可靠性,并使其适应土耳其语:对 10 名患者进行了试点研究。123 名患者每隔 24-48 小时接受一次 PSS 重测。对 PSS 的结构效度、与其他量表的相关性进行了评估,包括定时上下楼测试(TUG)、爬楼梯和下楼梯测试(SCD)、膝关节前侧疼痛量表(AKPS)、Tegner 活动量表(TAS)、Lysholm 膝关节评分量表(LDSS)、膝关节日常生活活动量表(KOS-ADL):结果:量表的内容效度指数为 0.95。总体内部一致性(Cronbach α:0.88)较高。量表的项目-总相关在 0.51 和 0.7 之间。在评估 PSS 的收敛效度时发现,PSSS 与 TUG 和 SCD 之间存在正相关,而 PSS、TAS、LDSS 和 KOS-ADL 之间存在负相关(p = 0.000):本研究结果表明,与 KOS-ADL、LDSS 和 AKPS 相比,PSSS 量表具有良好的内部一致性、重测效度和足够的建构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信