Identifying social outcomes of importance for childhood cancer survivors: an e-Delphi study.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sarah H Milner, R G Feltbower, K L Absolom, A W Glaser
{"title":"Identifying social outcomes of importance for childhood cancer survivors: an e-Delphi study.","authors":"Sarah H Milner, R G Feltbower, K L Absolom, A W Glaser","doi":"10.1186/s41687-023-00676-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk of deficits in their social outcomes, a key aspect of overall health and quality of life. Social outcomes of import are ill-defined leading to potential gaps in research and service provision. In this study, we undertook a preliminary consensus seeking exercise to support the development of a framework of the important social outcomes for CCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified e-Delphi study was conducted with four groups: CCS, health professionals, social workers and teachers. Round 1, developed from a literature review, included 34 questions rated for importance on a 7-point Likert scale. Rounds 2 and 3 presented items not achieving consensus, additionally proposed items and in round 3, a ranking question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey 1 was completed by 38 participants, 31 (82%) completed survey 2 and 28 (76%) completed survey 3. A total of 36 items were prioritised across 6 domains (education, independence, work, relationships, community, lifestyle), together forming the final list of social outcomes. Of these, 22 items met consensus for importance. Items rated most important were \"having autonomy\" and \"avoiding social isolation\". Quantitative and qualitative results reflected that social outcomes for survivors and general public should be the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have generated initial consensus on important social outcomes for CCS, highlighting the need for these to be matched to those of the general population. It suggests strategies are required to ensure autonomy and appropriate support for independence and relationships are provided through long-term aftercare and beyond. Further work is needed to validate and develop these findings into a framework to support appropriate social aftercare for CCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10844160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00676-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk of deficits in their social outcomes, a key aspect of overall health and quality of life. Social outcomes of import are ill-defined leading to potential gaps in research and service provision. In this study, we undertook a preliminary consensus seeking exercise to support the development of a framework of the important social outcomes for CCS.

Methods: A modified e-Delphi study was conducted with four groups: CCS, health professionals, social workers and teachers. Round 1, developed from a literature review, included 34 questions rated for importance on a 7-point Likert scale. Rounds 2 and 3 presented items not achieving consensus, additionally proposed items and in round 3, a ranking question.

Results: Survey 1 was completed by 38 participants, 31 (82%) completed survey 2 and 28 (76%) completed survey 3. A total of 36 items were prioritised across 6 domains (education, independence, work, relationships, community, lifestyle), together forming the final list of social outcomes. Of these, 22 items met consensus for importance. Items rated most important were "having autonomy" and "avoiding social isolation". Quantitative and qualitative results reflected that social outcomes for survivors and general public should be the same.

Conclusion: We have generated initial consensus on important social outcomes for CCS, highlighting the need for these to be matched to those of the general population. It suggests strategies are required to ensure autonomy and appropriate support for independence and relationships are provided through long-term aftercare and beyond. Further work is needed to validate and develop these findings into a framework to support appropriate social aftercare for CCS.

确定对儿童癌症幸存者具有重要意义的社会成果:一项电子德尔菲研究。
目的:儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)的社会功能有可能出现缺陷,而社会功能是整体健康和生活质量的一个重要方面。社会影响的定义尚不明确,因此在研究和服务提供方面可能存在差距。在本研究中,我们开展了一项初步的共识寻求活动,以支持制定一个关于社区支持服务重要社会成果的框架:方法:我们对四组人进行了修改后的电子德尔菲研究:方法:我们对四个小组进行了改良的 e-Delphi 研究,这四个小组分别是:社区儿童服务、卫生专业人员、社会工作者和教师。第一轮研究是根据文献综述制定的,包括 34 个问题,以 7 分李克特量表评定其重要性。第 2 轮和第 3 轮提出了未达成共识的项目、额外建议的项目,第 3 轮提出了一个排序问题:38 名参与者完成了调查 1,31 人(82%)完成了调查 2,28 人(76%)完成了调查 3。共有 36 个项目在 6 个领域(教育、独立、工作、人际关系、社区、生活方式)中被确定了优先次序,共同构成了最终的社会成果清单。其中,22 个项目的重要性得到了一致认可。被评为最重要的项目是 "拥有自主权 "和 "避免社会孤立"。定量和定性结果都反映出,幸存者和普通公众的社会成果应该是相同的:结论:我们已就社区照顾服务的重要社会成果达成初步共识,并强调这些成果需要与普通人群的社会成果相匹配。这表明需要制定战略,以确保在长期的善后护理及以后的生活中提供自主性和适当的独立及人际关系支持。还需要进一步的工作来验证这些研究结果,并将其发展成为一个框架,以支持对社区支持服务者进行适当的社会善后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信