A novel stackelberg game-theoretic optimization model for interaction between two closed-loop supply chains with a queueing approach

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"A novel stackelberg game-theoretic optimization model for interaction between two closed-loop supply chains with a queueing approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Supply chain coordination is often facilitated through contracts, but these contracts can present numerous issues, such as production and distribution coordination problems, a lack of a holistic supply chain view, and long-term incompatibility. Game theory is a well-known method for finding solutions to these coordination problems. This research aims to evaluate communication and cooperation efficiency among industrial partners in supply chains, with a focus on stochastic customer demand. The primary objective is to optimize the coordination of the proposed supply chain by incorporating various types of contracts. Accordingly, a thorough exploration of game theory is conducted to identify solutions for the coordination problems inherent in supply chains. In this context, a comprehensive game theory formulation is proposed to determine the optimal interaction between supply chain members, with a particular focus on the variables of communication and coordination that need optimization. In this regard, the Stackelberg equilibrium is applied to find the best possible solution. The proposed model combines queuing theory to evaluate aspects and game theory when customers can communicate between two supply chains to make decisions. Numerical results show that implementing the proposed method increased the profit for the entire system by 7%. Moreover, cooperation between different companies in the distribution system can yield a higher expected profit for all partners under different scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S230718772400021X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supply chain coordination is often facilitated through contracts, but these contracts can present numerous issues, such as production and distribution coordination problems, a lack of a holistic supply chain view, and long-term incompatibility. Game theory is a well-known method for finding solutions to these coordination problems. This research aims to evaluate communication and cooperation efficiency among industrial partners in supply chains, with a focus on stochastic customer demand. The primary objective is to optimize the coordination of the proposed supply chain by incorporating various types of contracts. Accordingly, a thorough exploration of game theory is conducted to identify solutions for the coordination problems inherent in supply chains. In this context, a comprehensive game theory formulation is proposed to determine the optimal interaction between supply chain members, with a particular focus on the variables of communication and coordination that need optimization. In this regard, the Stackelberg equilibrium is applied to find the best possible solution. The proposed model combines queuing theory to evaluate aspects and game theory when customers can communicate between two supply chains to make decisions. Numerical results show that implementing the proposed method increased the profit for the entire system by 7%. Moreover, cooperation between different companies in the distribution system can yield a higher expected profit for all partners under different scenarios.
用排队法建立两个闭环供应链互动的新型堆叠尔伯格博弈论优化模型
供应链协调通常通过合同来实现,但这些合同可能会带来许多问题,如生产和分销协调问题、缺乏整体供应链视角以及长期不兼容性。博弈论是解决这些协调问题的著名方法。本研究旨在评估供应链中工业合作伙伴之间的沟通与合作效率,重点关注随机客户需求。主要目标是通过纳入各种类型的合同,优化拟议供应链的协调。因此,我们对博弈论进行了深入探讨,以找出解决供应链固有协调问题的办法。在这种情况下,提出了一个全面的博弈论公式,以确定供应链成员之间的最佳互动,尤其侧重于需要优化的沟通和协调变量。在这方面,采用了斯塔克尔伯格均衡来寻找最佳解决方案。当客户可以在两个供应链之间进行沟通以做出决策时,所提出的模型结合了排队理论来评估各方面和博弈论。数值结果表明,采用所提出的方法后,整个系统的利润增加了 7%。此外,在不同情况下,分销系统中不同公司之间的合作可为所有合作伙伴带来更高的预期利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信