Association between Antenatal Antibiotic Exposure and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1159/000536220
Karen Van Mechelen, Tamara M Hundscheid, Elke van Westering-Kroon, František Bartoš, Eduardo Villamor
{"title":"Association between Antenatal Antibiotic Exposure and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Karen Van Mechelen, Tamara M Hundscheid, Elke van Westering-Kroon, František Bartoš, Eduardo Villamor","doi":"10.1159/000536220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antenatal antibiotic exposure has been suggested as a risk factor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on this potential association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched. BPD was classified as BPD28 (supplemental oxygen during 28 days or at postnatal day 28), BPD36 (supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks postmenstrual age), BPD36 or death, and BPD-associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH). Bayesian model-averaged (BMA) meta-analysis was used to calculate Bayes factors (BFs). The BF10 is the ratio of the probability of the data under the alternative hypothesis (H1) over the probability of the data under the null hypothesis (H0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 6 RCTs and 27 observational studies (126,614 infants). Regarding BPD28, BMA showed that the evidence in favor of H0 (lack of association with antenatal antibiotics) was weak for the RCTS (BF10 = 0.506, 6 studies) and moderate for the observational studies (BF10 = 0.286, 10 studies). Regarding BPD36, the evidence in favor of H0 was moderate for the RCTs (BF10 = 0.127, 2 studies) and weak for the observational studies (BF10 = 0.895, 14 studies). Evidence in favor of H0 was also weak for the associations with BPD36 or death (BF10 = 0.429, 2 studies) and BPD-PH (BF10 = 0.384, 2 studies). None of the meta-analyses showed evidence in favor of H1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The currently available evidence suggests a lack of association between antenatal antibiotics and BPD. However, our results should not be interpreted as an argument for widespread use of antibiotics in the setting of preterm delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"378-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antenatal antibiotic exposure has been suggested as a risk factor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on this potential association.

Methods: PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched. BPD was classified as BPD28 (supplemental oxygen during 28 days or at postnatal day 28), BPD36 (supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks postmenstrual age), BPD36 or death, and BPD-associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH). Bayesian model-averaged (BMA) meta-analysis was used to calculate Bayes factors (BFs). The BF10 is the ratio of the probability of the data under the alternative hypothesis (H1) over the probability of the data under the null hypothesis (H0).

Results: We included 6 RCTs and 27 observational studies (126,614 infants). Regarding BPD28, BMA showed that the evidence in favor of H0 (lack of association with antenatal antibiotics) was weak for the RCTS (BF10 = 0.506, 6 studies) and moderate for the observational studies (BF10 = 0.286, 10 studies). Regarding BPD36, the evidence in favor of H0 was moderate for the RCTs (BF10 = 0.127, 2 studies) and weak for the observational studies (BF10 = 0.895, 14 studies). Evidence in favor of H0 was also weak for the associations with BPD36 or death (BF10 = 0.429, 2 studies) and BPD-PH (BF10 = 0.384, 2 studies). None of the meta-analyses showed evidence in favor of H1.

Conclusions: The currently available evidence suggests a lack of association between antenatal antibiotics and BPD. However, our results should not be interpreted as an argument for widespread use of antibiotics in the setting of preterm delivery.

产前抗生素暴露与支气管肺发育不良之间的关系:系统回顾与贝叶斯模型平均荟萃分析》(Association between Antenatal Antibiotic Exposure and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis)。
导言:产前抗生素暴露被认为是支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的一个风险因素。我们旨在总结随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究中有关这一潜在关联的证据:方法:检索了 PubMedline/Medline 和 Embase 数据库。BPD分为BPD28(28天内或出生后第28天补充氧气)、BPD36(月龄后36周补充氧气)、BPD36或死亡以及BPD相关性肺动脉高压(BPD-PH)。贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)荟萃分析用于计算贝叶斯因子(BFs)。BF10是备选假设(H1)下的数据概率与无效假设(H0)下的数据概率之比:我们纳入了 6 项研究性临床试验和 27 项观察性研究(126 614 名婴儿)。关于 BPD28,BMA 显示,RCTS(BF10 = 0.506,6 项研究)和观察性研究(BF10 = 0.286,10 项研究)支持 H0(与产前抗生素缺乏关联)的证据较弱(BF10 = 0.506,6 项研究),支持 H0 的证据中等(BF10 = 0.286,10 项研究)。关于 BPD36,RCTs 中支持 H0 的证据为中度(BF10 = 0.127,2 项研究),观察性研究中支持 H0 的证据为弱度(BF10 = 0.895,14 项研究)。在与 BPD36 或死亡(BF10 = 0.429,2 项研究)和 BPD-PH (BF10 = 0.384,2 项研究)的关联中,支持 H0 的证据也较弱。没有一项荟萃分析显示证据支持 H1:现有证据表明,产前抗生素与 BPD 之间缺乏关联。然而,我们的结果不应被解释为在早产情况下广泛使用抗生素的论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信