Estimating Health Expectancy in Japanese Communities Using Mortality Rate and Disability Prevalence.

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
JMA journal Pub Date : 2024-01-15 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2023-0058
Rikuya Hosokawa, Toshiyuki Ojima, Tomoya Myojin, Jun Aida, Katsunori Kondo, Naoki Kondo
{"title":"Estimating Health Expectancy in Japanese Communities Using Mortality Rate and Disability Prevalence.","authors":"Rikuya Hosokawa, Toshiyuki Ojima, Tomoya Myojin, Jun Aida, Katsunori Kondo, Naoki Kondo","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2023-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although mortality and disability are known to be associated with health expectancy (LE), few studies have assessed the extent to which a reduction in their prevalence can extend a person's LE. Moreover, differences in this relationship based on gender have not been established. Thus, in this study, we constructed a regression model using the rate of mortality and prevalence of disability to predict LE in older adults (≥65 years) and assess the relationships between LE, mortality rate, and disability prevalence based on gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from Japan's population registry and long-term insurance records (N = 344). Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between LE, mortality rate, and disability prevalence, stratified by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age-adjusted mortality rate and disability prevalence significantly predicted LE and were significantly correlated with the measured LE index for both genders. For every 1% annual decrease in age-adjusted mortality, LE increased by 1.54 years for men and 2.15 years for women. Similarly, a 1% annual decrease in age-adjusted disability prevalence increased LE by 0.22 years for men and 0.32 years for women. The regression model coefficients indicated that the strength of the association between LE, mortality rate, and disability prevalence differed between genders. Our model accurately predicted LE (men: adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.968, women: adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.994).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health promotion policies that are geared toward increasing health expectancy can be evaluated using mortality rate and disability prevalence as prognostic indicators. The strength of the association between LE, mortality, and disability differed between genders, suggesting the need for gender-specific policy planning to increase LE for both genders.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10834173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2023-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although mortality and disability are known to be associated with health expectancy (LE), few studies have assessed the extent to which a reduction in their prevalence can extend a person's LE. Moreover, differences in this relationship based on gender have not been established. Thus, in this study, we constructed a regression model using the rate of mortality and prevalence of disability to predict LE in older adults (≥65 years) and assess the relationships between LE, mortality rate, and disability prevalence based on gender.

Methods: Data were collected from Japan's population registry and long-term insurance records (N = 344). Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between LE, mortality rate, and disability prevalence, stratified by gender.

Results: Age-adjusted mortality rate and disability prevalence significantly predicted LE and were significantly correlated with the measured LE index for both genders. For every 1% annual decrease in age-adjusted mortality, LE increased by 1.54 years for men and 2.15 years for women. Similarly, a 1% annual decrease in age-adjusted disability prevalence increased LE by 0.22 years for men and 0.32 years for women. The regression model coefficients indicated that the strength of the association between LE, mortality rate, and disability prevalence differed between genders. Our model accurately predicted LE (men: adjusted R2 = 0.968, women: adjusted R2 = 0.994).

Conclusions: Health promotion policies that are geared toward increasing health expectancy can be evaluated using mortality rate and disability prevalence as prognostic indicators. The strength of the association between LE, mortality, and disability differed between genders, suggesting the need for gender-specific policy planning to increase LE for both genders.

利用死亡率和残疾率估算日本社区的健康预期。
导言:众所周知,死亡率和残疾率与预期健康寿命(LE)有关,但很少有研究评估降低死亡率和残疾率在多大程度上可以延长一个人的预期健康寿命。此外,这种关系在性别上的差异也尚未确定。因此,在本研究中,我们利用死亡率和残疾发生率构建了一个回归模型,以预测老年人(≥65 岁)的寿命,并根据性别评估寿命、死亡率和残疾发生率之间的关系:数据来自日本人口登记和长期保险记录(N = 344)。方法:从日本人口登记和长期保险记录中收集数据(N = 344),采用多元线性回归分析LE、死亡率和残疾发生率之间的关系,并按性别进行分层:结果:年龄调整后的死亡率和残疾发生率可显著预测LE,并且与男女两性的测量LE指数显著相关。年龄调整后死亡率每年每下降 1%,男性的生命周期就会延长 1.54 年,女性则延长 2.15 年。同样,年龄调整后的残疾发生率每年每下降 1%,男性的 LE 指数就会增加 0.22 年,女性增加 0.32 年。回归模型系数表明,LE、死亡率和残疾发生率之间的关联强度在性别之间存在差异。我们的模型准确预测了LE(男性:调整后R2=0.968,女性:调整后R2=0.994):结论:可以使用死亡率和残疾发生率作为预后指标来评估旨在延长预期健康寿命的健康促进政策。不同性别的预期寿命、死亡率和残疾率之间的关联程度不同,这表明有必要制定针对不同性别的政策规划,以提高男女两性的预期寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信