Learnability Advantage of Segmental Repetitions in Word Learning.

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Language and Speech Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1177/00238309231223909
Johanna Basnak, Mitsuhiko Ota
{"title":"Learnability Advantage of Segmental Repetitions in Word Learning.","authors":"Johanna Basnak, Mitsuhiko Ota","doi":"10.1177/00238309231223909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, research on wordform learning biases has mostly focused on language-dependent factors, such as the phonotactics and neighborhood density of the language(s) known by the learner. Domain-general biases, by contrast, have received little attention. In this study, we focus on one such bias-an advantage for string-internal repetitions-and examine its effects on wordform learning. Importantly, we consider whether any type of segmental repetition is equally beneficial for word recall, or whether learning is favored more or only by repeated consonants, in line with previous research indicating that consonants play a larger role than vowels in lexical processing. In Experiment 1, adult English speakers learned artificial consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel words containing either a repeated consonant (e.g., /sesu/, \"c-rep\"), a repeated vowel (e.g., /sepe/, \"v-rep\"), or dissimilar consonants and vowels (e.g., /sepu/, \"no-rep\"). Recall results showed no advantage for v-reps but higher accuracy for c-reps compared with no-reps. In Experiment 2, participants performed a label preference task with the same stimuli. The results showed dispreference for both c-reps and v-reps relative to no-reps, indicating that the results of Experiment 1 are independent of wordlikeness effects. These outcomes reveal that there is a form-learning bias for words with identical consonants but not for words with identical vowels, suggesting that a domain-general advantage for repetitions within strings is modulated by a language-specific processing bias for consonants.</p>","PeriodicalId":51255,"journal":{"name":"Language and Speech","volume":" ","pages":"1093-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309231223909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, research on wordform learning biases has mostly focused on language-dependent factors, such as the phonotactics and neighborhood density of the language(s) known by the learner. Domain-general biases, by contrast, have received little attention. In this study, we focus on one such bias-an advantage for string-internal repetitions-and examine its effects on wordform learning. Importantly, we consider whether any type of segmental repetition is equally beneficial for word recall, or whether learning is favored more or only by repeated consonants, in line with previous research indicating that consonants play a larger role than vowels in lexical processing. In Experiment 1, adult English speakers learned artificial consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel words containing either a repeated consonant (e.g., /sesu/, "c-rep"), a repeated vowel (e.g., /sepe/, "v-rep"), or dissimilar consonants and vowels (e.g., /sepu/, "no-rep"). Recall results showed no advantage for v-reps but higher accuracy for c-reps compared with no-reps. In Experiment 2, participants performed a label preference task with the same stimuli. The results showed dispreference for both c-reps and v-reps relative to no-reps, indicating that the results of Experiment 1 are independent of wordlikeness effects. These outcomes reveal that there is a form-learning bias for words with identical consonants but not for words with identical vowels, suggesting that a domain-general advantage for repetitions within strings is modulated by a language-specific processing bias for consonants.

分段重复在单词学习中的学习优势
迄今为止,有关词形学习偏误的研究主要集中在语言相关因素上,如学习者已知语言的音素和邻域密度。相比之下,一般领域的偏误却很少受到关注。在本研究中,我们将重点放在这样一种偏误上--字符串内部重复的优势--并考察其对词形学习的影响。重要的是,我们考虑了是否任何类型的分段重复对单词记忆都同样有益,或者是否重复辅音更有利于学习,或者只有重复辅音才有利于学习,这与之前的研究一致,研究表明辅音在词汇加工中比元音起更大的作用。在实验一中,成年英语使用者学习了包含重复辅音(如/sesu/,"c-rep")、重复元音(如/sepe/,"v-rep")或不同辅音和元音(如/sepu/,"no-rep")的人工辅音-元音-辅音-元音单词。回忆结果显示,v-reps 没有优势,但 c-reps 与 no-reps 相比,准确率更高。在实验 2 中,受试者用同样的刺激物完成了标签偏好任务。结果显示,c-reps 和 v-reps 相对于 no-reps 都具有非偏好性,这表明实验 1 的结果与词相似性效应无关。这些结果表明,具有相同辅音的单词存在形式学习偏误,而具有相同元音的单词则不存在形式学习偏误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language and Speech
Language and Speech AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language and Speech is a peer-reviewed journal which provides an international forum for communication among researchers in the disciplines that contribute to our understanding of the production, perception, processing, learning, use, and disorders of speech and language. The journal accepts reports of original research in all these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信