Effects of eliminating visual cues on kinetic and kinematic parameters in back tuck somersault: A comparison between artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes.

IF 0.8 4区医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2023-01-01

Nour Mohamed Abahnini, Khemais Abahnini, Bessem Mkaouer

{"title":"Effects of eliminating visual cues on kinetic and kinematic parameters in back tuck somersault: A comparison between artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes.","authors":"Nour Mohamed Abahnini, Khemais Abahnini, Bessem Mkaouer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of vision (i.e., open and closed eyes) on the kinetic and kinematic parameters of the standing back tuck somersault (SBTS) in artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes.Methods: Eleven male parkour athletes (age 22.53 ± 2.36 years; height 1.72 ± 0.08 m; weight 69.58 ± 3.72 kg) and seven male artistic gymnasts (age 21.96 ± 2.64 years; height 1.62 ± 0.02 m; weight 63.54 ± 1.35 kg) participated in this study. Each subject was asked to perform the SBTS in the same condition (i.e., first open-eyes then closed-eyes). 2D kinetic and kinematic analysis was conducted.Results: The results showed significant interaction (i.e., vision and sport) obtained at the take-off angle (p <0.05 and d = 1.992), horizontal displacement (p <0.05 and d = 1.906) and technical execution (p < 0.05 and d = 1.972). This interaction indicates that when vision is permitted, artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes were similar in all kinetic and kinematic parameters, and technical execution (p > 0.05). However, the elimination of vision during SBTS only affected parkour athletes (i.e., landing angle, ground reaction force, vertical velocity and technical execution, p < 0.05 and d > 1.20) while artistic gymnasts remain unchanged.Conclusion: We conclude that the specificity of the practice in each of the two sports disciplines influences the kinetic and kinematic control of the SBTS and suggests that with closed-eyes, the integration of afferent information relating to the vestibular and proprioceptive systems is different and specific to each discipline's goal. Artistic gymnasts seem to be better skilled in the mechanical and technical control of the SBTS than parkour athletes.","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of vision (i.e., open and closed eyes) on the kinetic and kinematic parameters of the standing back tuck somersault (SBTS) in artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes.

Methods: Eleven male parkour athletes (age 22.53 ± 2.36 years; height 1.72 ± 0.08 m; weight 69.58 ± 3.72 kg) and seven male artistic gymnasts (age 21.96 ± 2.64 years; height 1.62 ± 0.02 m; weight 63.54 ± 1.35 kg) participated in this study. Each subject was asked to perform the SBTS in the same condition (i.e., first open-eyes then closed-eyes). 2D kinetic and kinematic analysis was conducted.

Results: The results showed significant interaction (i.e., vision and sport) obtained at the take-off angle (p <0.05 and d = 1.992), horizontal displacement (p <0.05 and d = 1.906) and technical execution (p < 0.05 and d = 1.972). This interaction indicates that when vision is permitted, artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes were similar in all kinetic and kinematic parameters, and technical execution (p > 0.05). However, the elimination of vision during SBTS only affected parkour athletes (i.e., landing angle, ground reaction force, vertical velocity and technical execution, p < 0.05 and d > 1.20) while artistic gymnasts remain unchanged.

Conclusion: We conclude that the specificity of the practice in each of the two sports disciplines influences the kinetic and kinematic control of the SBTS and suggests that with closed-eyes, the integration of afferent information relating to the vestibular and proprioceptive systems is different and specific to each discipline's goal. Artistic gymnasts seem to be better skilled in the mechanical and technical control of the SBTS than parkour athletes.

本刊更多论文

消除视觉线索对后翻筋斗运动和运动参数的影响：艺术体操运动员与跑酷运动员之间的比较。

目的：本研究旨在比较视觉（即睁眼和闭眼）对艺术体操运动员和跑酷运动员立定后翻筋斗（SBTS）的动力学和运动学参数的影响：11 名男性跑酷运动员（年龄 22.53 ± 2.36 岁；身高 1.72 ± 0.08 米；体重 69.58 ± 3.72 千克）和 7 名男性艺术体操运动员（年龄 21.96 ± 2.64 岁；身高 1.62 ± 0.02 米；体重 63.54 ± 1.35 千克）参加了本研究。每个受试者都被要求在相同的条件下完成 SBTS（即先睁眼后闭眼）。进行了二维动力学和运动学分析：结果表明，在起飞角度上存在明显的交互作用（即视觉和运动）（P 0.05）。然而，在 SBTS 期间消除视觉只对跑酷运动员产生影响（即着地角度、地面反作用力、垂直速度和技术执行力，p < 0.05 和 d > 1.20），而艺术体操运动员则保持不变：我们得出的结论是，两个运动项目中每一个项目练习的特殊性都会影响 SBTS 的运动和运动控制，并表明在闭眼情况下，与前庭和本体感觉系统有关的传入信息的整合是不同的，并与每个项目的目标相适应。与跑酷运动员相比，艺术体操运动员似乎更擅长 SBTS 的机械和技术控制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.