Contributions of flexor hallucis longus and brevis muscles to isometric toe flexor force production.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Michael Rowley, Toshiyuki Kurihara, David Ortiz-Weissberg, Kornelia Kulig
{"title":"Contributions of flexor hallucis longus and brevis muscles to isometric toe flexor force production.","authors":"Michael Rowley, Toshiyuki Kurihara, David Ortiz-Weissberg, Kornelia Kulig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Morphological differences between the two primary great toe flexors - flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) - likely drive differences in how these muscles contribute to functional toe flexor torque production. The aim of the study was to investigate FHL and FHB activation in two isometric toe flexion tasks - one called a \"toe-pushing\" task with the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints dorsiflexed and the interphalangeal (IP) joints in neutral and another called a \"toe-gripping\" task with the MTP joints in neutral and flexed IP joints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty participants' FHL and FHB muscles were instrumented with intramuscular electromyography electrodes. Muscle activation was normalized to a maximum voluntary contraction and compared between the two isometric toe flexor force production tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, participants utilized these two toe flexors completely differently in the two tasks. In the toe-gripping task, the FHL was activated to a much greater extent than the FHB. In fact, 18 our of 20 participants activated FHL at more than 70% maximum voluntary contraction and half of participants activated FHB at less than 10%. In contrast, muscle activation during the toe-pushing task appeared more reliant on the FHB for most participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different contributions from the FHL and FHB to toe flexor force production in these two tasks are potentially driven by differences in muscle functional length among other factors. These findings help to inform the selection of rehabilitation and training exercises meant to preferentially target intrinsic or extrinsic foot musculature.</p>","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Morphological differences between the two primary great toe flexors - flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) - likely drive differences in how these muscles contribute to functional toe flexor torque production. The aim of the study was to investigate FHL and FHB activation in two isometric toe flexion tasks - one called a "toe-pushing" task with the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints dorsiflexed and the interphalangeal (IP) joints in neutral and another called a "toe-gripping" task with the MTP joints in neutral and flexed IP joints.

Methods: Twenty participants' FHL and FHB muscles were instrumented with intramuscular electromyography electrodes. Muscle activation was normalized to a maximum voluntary contraction and compared between the two isometric toe flexor force production tasks.

Results: Overall, participants utilized these two toe flexors completely differently in the two tasks. In the toe-gripping task, the FHL was activated to a much greater extent than the FHB. In fact, 18 our of 20 participants activated FHL at more than 70% maximum voluntary contraction and half of participants activated FHB at less than 10%. In contrast, muscle activation during the toe-pushing task appeared more reliant on the FHB for most participants.

Conclusions: Different contributions from the FHL and FHB to toe flexor force production in these two tasks are potentially driven by differences in muscle functional length among other factors. These findings help to inform the selection of rehabilitation and training exercises meant to preferentially target intrinsic or extrinsic foot musculature.

拇长屈肌和拇阔肌对等长屈趾肌力产生的贡献。
目的:两个主要大趾屈肌--拇长屈肌腱(FHL)和拇短屈肌腱(FHB)--之间的形态差异很可能会导致这些肌肉对功能性趾屈肌扭矩产生的贡献不同。该研究旨在调查 FHL 和 FHB 在两项等长趾屈伸任务中的激活情况,其中一项任务称为 "推趾 "任务,跖趾关节 (MTP) 外展,趾间关节 (IP) 保持中立;另一项任务称为 "抓趾 "任务,MTP 关节保持中立,IP 关节弯曲:在 20 名参与者的 FHL 和 FHB 肌肉上安装了肌肉肌电图电极。将肌肉激活归一化为最大自主收缩,并对两种等长趾屈肌发力任务进行比较:总体而言,参与者在两项任务中对这两种趾屈肌的使用完全不同。在抓趾任务中,FHL 的激活程度远高于 FHB。事实上,20 名参与者中有 18 人激活 FHL 的最大自主收缩率超过 70%,而半数参与者激活 FHB 的最大自主收缩率低于 10%。相比之下,大多数参与者在脚趾用力任务中的肌肉激活似乎更依赖于 FHB:结论:在这两项任务中,FHL 和 FHB 对趾屈肌力量产生的不同贡献可能是由肌肉功能长度差异等因素造成的。这些发现有助于为选择优先针对足部内在或外在肌肉组织的康复和训练练习提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信