Success in the national care of pediatric trauma patients✰,✰✰

Kendall J Burdick , Aixa Perez Coulter , Michael Tirabassi
{"title":"Success in the national care of pediatric trauma patients✰,✰✰","authors":"Kendall J Burdick ,&nbsp;Aixa Perez Coulter ,&nbsp;Michael Tirabassi","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pediatric trauma patients should be treated at pediatric trauma centers, though not every patient can be transported to one. Our goal was to report outcomes for trauma patients at centers of varying levels of verification by the American College of Surgeons (ACS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Retrospective review of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program trauma registry data of patients (&lt;15 years old) receiving care at trauma centers in the United States. We compared level 1 and 2 pediatric trauma centers (PTC1 and PTC2) and level 1, 2 and 3 adult trauma centers (TC1, TC2, TC3). Main outcome measure was mortality. Secondary measures were injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications and race/ethnicity. We also stratified by trauma severity (non-severe vs severe ISS≥15), and age groups (0–3, 3–10, 10–15).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>41,399 patients met our inclusion criteria: 37,624 blunt, 3,775 penetrating. Of all patients, 66.7 % were treated at a PTC (69.9 % PTC1, 30.1 % PTC2), and 1.6 % of trauma resulted in mortality. Mortality rate (the percentage of cases treated that resulted in mortality) by trauma center varied more for penetrating trauma (range: 2.1–8.0) than for blunt trauma (range: 0.9–1.7). For blunt trauma, 46.6 % were treated at PTC1s and 1.3 % resulted in mortality. The highest mean ISS and length of stay were at TC1s. For penetrating trauma, 47.5 % were treated at PTC1s and 5.0 % resulted in mortality. Most traumas were non-severe and mortality rates for penetrating trauma were higher for the 10–15 age group, though still lower at pediatric trauma centers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority of pediatric trauma patients were treated at a PTC with slightly better outcomes than TCs. Overall, treatment at PTCs resulted in slightly lower mortality rates, shorter LOS, and lower/equivalent 30-day complication rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000121/pdfft?md5=f7437ba303644ec99332100763f956b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2949711624000121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pediatric trauma patients should be treated at pediatric trauma centers, though not every patient can be transported to one. Our goal was to report outcomes for trauma patients at centers of varying levels of verification by the American College of Surgeons (ACS).

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program trauma registry data of patients (<15 years old) receiving care at trauma centers in the United States. We compared level 1 and 2 pediatric trauma centers (PTC1 and PTC2) and level 1, 2 and 3 adult trauma centers (TC1, TC2, TC3). Main outcome measure was mortality. Secondary measures were injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications and race/ethnicity. We also stratified by trauma severity (non-severe vs severe ISS≥15), and age groups (0–3, 3–10, 10–15).

Results

41,399 patients met our inclusion criteria: 37,624 blunt, 3,775 penetrating. Of all patients, 66.7 % were treated at a PTC (69.9 % PTC1, 30.1 % PTC2), and 1.6 % of trauma resulted in mortality. Mortality rate (the percentage of cases treated that resulted in mortality) by trauma center varied more for penetrating trauma (range: 2.1–8.0) than for blunt trauma (range: 0.9–1.7). For blunt trauma, 46.6 % were treated at PTC1s and 1.3 % resulted in mortality. The highest mean ISS and length of stay were at TC1s. For penetrating trauma, 47.5 % were treated at PTC1s and 5.0 % resulted in mortality. Most traumas were non-severe and mortality rates for penetrating trauma were higher for the 10–15 age group, though still lower at pediatric trauma centers.

Conclusion

The majority of pediatric trauma patients were treated at a PTC with slightly better outcomes than TCs. Overall, treatment at PTCs resulted in slightly lower mortality rates, shorter LOS, and lower/equivalent 30-day complication rates.

国家对小儿创伤患者的成功护理✰,✰✰
背景儿科创伤患者应在儿科创伤中心接受治疗,但并非每位患者都能被送往儿科创伤中心。我们的目标是报告在美国外科学院(ACS)认证的不同级别中心接受治疗的创伤患者的治疗效果。材料与方法回顾性审查了美国外科学院创伤质量改进计划(ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program)中在美国创伤中心接受治疗的患者(15 岁以下)的创伤登记数据。我们比较了1级和2级儿科创伤中心(PTC1和PTC2)以及1级、2级和3级成人创伤中心(TC1、TC2、TC3)。主要结果指标是死亡率。次要指标包括损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、住院时间(LOS)、30 天并发症和种族/人种。我们还根据创伤严重程度(非严重 vs 严重 ISS≥15)和年龄组(0-3、3-10、10-15)进行了分层:其中 37624 例为钝性创伤,3775 例为穿透性创伤。在所有患者中,66.7%的患者在 PTC 接受了治疗(69.9%为 PTC1,30.1%为 PTC2),1.6%的创伤导致死亡。按创伤中心划分的死亡率(导致死亡的治疗病例百分比),穿透性创伤(范围:2.1-8.0)比钝性创伤(范围:0.9-1.7)的差异更大。对于钝性创伤,46.6%的患者在 PTC1s 接受治疗,1.3%的患者死亡。TC1s 的平均 ISS 和住院时间最长。对于穿透性创伤,47.5%的患者在 PTC1s 接受治疗,5.0%的患者死亡。大多数创伤并不严重,10-15 岁年龄组的穿透性创伤死亡率较高,但儿科创伤中心的死亡率仍然较低。总体而言,在儿童创伤中心接受治疗的死亡率略低,住院时间较短,30 天并发症发生率较低/相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信