Clinical performance and utility: A microsimulation model to inform the design of screening trials for a multi-cancer early detection test.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1177/09691413241228041
James Y Dai, Jing Zhang, Jerome V Braun, Noah Simon, Earl Hubbell, Nan Zhang
{"title":"Clinical performance and utility: A microsimulation model to inform the design of screening trials for a multi-cancer early detection test.","authors":"James Y Dai, Jing Zhang, Jerome V Braun, Noah Simon, Earl Hubbell, Nan Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09691413241228041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Designing cancer screening trials for multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests presents a significant methodology challenge, as natural histories of cell-free DNA-shedding cancers are not yet known. A microsimulation model was developed to project the performance and utility of an MCED test in cancer screening trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual natural history of preclinical progression through cancer stages for 23 cancer classes was simulated by a stage-transition model under a broad range of cancer latency parameters. Cancer incidences and stage distributions at clinical presentation in simulated trials were set to match the data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. One or multiple rounds of annual screening using a targeted methylation-based MCED test (Galleri<b><sup>Ⓡ</sup></b>) was conducted to detect preclinical cancers. Mortality benefit of early detection was simulated by a stage-shift model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In simulated trials, accounting for healthy volunteer effect and varying test sensitivity, positive predictive value in the prevalence screening round reached 48% to 61% in 6 natural history scenarios. After 3 rounds of annual screening, the cumulative proportions of stage I/II cancers increased by approximately 9% to 14%, the incidence of stage IV cancers was reduced by 37% to 46%, the reduction of stages III and IV cancer incidences was 9% to 24%, and the reduction of mortality reached 13% to 16%. Greater reductions of late-stage cancers and cancer mortality were achieved by five rounds of MCED screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation results guide trial design and suggest that adding this MCED test to routine screening in the United States may shift cancer detection to earlier stages, and potentially save lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"140-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241228041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Designing cancer screening trials for multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests presents a significant methodology challenge, as natural histories of cell-free DNA-shedding cancers are not yet known. A microsimulation model was developed to project the performance and utility of an MCED test in cancer screening trials.

Methods: Individual natural history of preclinical progression through cancer stages for 23 cancer classes was simulated by a stage-transition model under a broad range of cancer latency parameters. Cancer incidences and stage distributions at clinical presentation in simulated trials were set to match the data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. One or multiple rounds of annual screening using a targeted methylation-based MCED test (Galleri) was conducted to detect preclinical cancers. Mortality benefit of early detection was simulated by a stage-shift model.

Results: In simulated trials, accounting for healthy volunteer effect and varying test sensitivity, positive predictive value in the prevalence screening round reached 48% to 61% in 6 natural history scenarios. After 3 rounds of annual screening, the cumulative proportions of stage I/II cancers increased by approximately 9% to 14%, the incidence of stage IV cancers was reduced by 37% to 46%, the reduction of stages III and IV cancer incidences was 9% to 24%, and the reduction of mortality reached 13% to 16%. Greater reductions of late-stage cancers and cancer mortality were achieved by five rounds of MCED screening.

Conclusions: Simulation results guide trial design and suggest that adding this MCED test to routine screening in the United States may shift cancer detection to earlier stages, and potentially save lives.

临床表现与效用:一个微观模拟模型,为多种癌症早期检测试验的筛查设计提供参考。
目的:设计多癌早期检测(MCED)癌症筛查试验是一项重大的方法学挑战,因为无细胞DNA脱落癌症的自然史尚不清楚。我们开发了一个微观模拟模型来预测癌症筛查试验中 MCED 检测的性能和效用:方法:在广泛的癌症潜伏期参数下,通过阶段转换模型模拟了 23 种癌症的临床前癌症阶段进展的个体自然史。模拟试验中临床表现时的癌症发病率和分期分布与监测、流行病学和最终结果项目的数据相匹配。使用基于甲基化的目标 MCED 测试(GalleriⓇ)进行一轮或多轮年度筛查,以检测临床前癌症。结果:结果:在模拟试验中,考虑到健康志愿者效应和不同的测试灵敏度,在 6 种自然历史情况下,流行率筛查的阳性预测值达到 48% 至 61%。经过三轮年度筛查后,I/II期癌症的累计比例增加了约9%至14%,IV期癌症的发病率降低了37%至46%,III期和IV期癌症的发病率降低了9%至24%,死亡率降低了13%至16%。通过五轮MCED筛查,晚期癌症和癌症死亡率的降低幅度更大:模拟结果为试验设计提供了指导,并表明在美国的常规筛查中加入 MCED 检测可将癌症检测转移到早期阶段,并有可能挽救生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信