The Standard of Care Test Revisited: Competing Approaches to Defining Competent Profession Practice in Australia.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01
Cameron Stewart, Peter Kim
{"title":"The Standard of Care Test Revisited: Competing Approaches to Defining Competent Profession Practice in Australia.","authors":"Cameron Stewart, Peter Kim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This section examines the recent decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Dean v Pope [2022] NSWCA 260. The decision settles a long-running dispute in New South Wales about the test for the standard of care under s 5O of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). That provision was introduced following the medical indemnity crisis of the early 2000s and provided for a modified Bolam test to protect professionals from claims in negligence when they had acted in accordance with a standard of \"competent professional practice\". In recent years there has been controversy regarding whether that section required the practice to be one already established to satisfy the section. This section examines the decision, how it fits into the history of the Ipp reforms and what it means for other jurisdictions in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 2","pages":"278-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This section examines the recent decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Dean v Pope [2022] NSWCA 260. The decision settles a long-running dispute in New South Wales about the test for the standard of care under s 5O of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). That provision was introduced following the medical indemnity crisis of the early 2000s and provided for a modified Bolam test to protect professionals from claims in negligence when they had acted in accordance with a standard of "competent professional practice". In recent years there has been controversy regarding whether that section required the practice to be one already established to satisfy the section. This section examines the decision, how it fits into the history of the Ipp reforms and what it means for other jurisdictions in Australia.

重新审视护理标准测试:重新审视护理标准测试:澳大利亚界定胜任专业实践的竞争方法》(Competing Approaches to Defining Competent Profession Practice in Australia)。
本节探讨新南威尔士州上诉法院最近在 Dean 诉 Pope [2022] NSWCA 260 案中做出的判决。该判决解决了新南威尔士州关于 2002 年《民事责任法》(新南威尔士州)第 5O 条规定的护理标准检验标准的长期争议。该条款是在 2000 年代初的医疗赔偿危机之后引入的,规定了经修改的博勒姆检验标准,以保护专业人员在按照 "合格的专业实践 "标准行事时免受过失索赔。近年来,关于该条款是否要求实践必须是已经确立的实践才能满足该条款的要求,一直存在争议。本节探讨了该判决、它与 Ipp 改革历史的契合点以及它对澳大利亚其他司法管辖区的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信