Supporting the Involvement of Adults with Cognitive Disabilities in Research: The Need for Reform.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01
Shih-Ning Then, John Chesterman, Yuu Matsuyama
{"title":"Supporting the Involvement of Adults with Cognitive Disabilities in Research: The Need for Reform.","authors":"Shih-Ning Then, John Chesterman, Yuu Matsuyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines current legal and ethical requirements concerning research about adults with cognitive disabilities. These requirements, the article argues, are complex, difficult to navigate, and inevitably act as a disincentive for research to be conducted. These requirements also do little to encourage active involvement by adults with cognitive disabilities in deciding whether to participate in research. The article argues that reforms are needed for State and Territory laws to require, wherever possible, adults to be supported to make their own decisions about research participation. State and Territory law reform is also required to clarify when, and on what basis, others may be appointed to make research participation decisions on behalf of adults with cognitive disabilities. The article concludes by seeking complementary reform of the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, which would result in it being more human rights compliant and simpler to apply.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 2","pages":"459-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines current legal and ethical requirements concerning research about adults with cognitive disabilities. These requirements, the article argues, are complex, difficult to navigate, and inevitably act as a disincentive for research to be conducted. These requirements also do little to encourage active involvement by adults with cognitive disabilities in deciding whether to participate in research. The article argues that reforms are needed for State and Territory laws to require, wherever possible, adults to be supported to make their own decisions about research participation. State and Territory law reform is also required to clarify when, and on what basis, others may be appointed to make research participation decisions on behalf of adults with cognitive disabilities. The article concludes by seeking complementary reform of the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, which would result in it being more human rights compliant and simpler to apply.

支持有认知障碍的成年人参与研究:改革的必要性》。
本文探讨了当前有关认知障碍成人研究的法律和伦理要求。文章认为,这些要求既复杂又难以驾驭,不可避免地会阻碍研究的开展。此外,这些要求也不利于鼓励认知障碍成人积极参与决定是否参与研究。文章认为,需要对各州和地区的法律进行改革,要求尽可能支持成年人自己决定是否参与研究。各州和地区的法律也需要改革,以明确何时以及在什么基础上可以指定他人代表有认知障碍的成年人做出参与研究的决定。文章最后寻求对《国家健康与医学研究委员会关于人类研究伦理行为的国家声明》进行补充改革,使其更加符合人权要求,应用起来更加简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信