Safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing: OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20.5 million adults' electronic health records.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0163
Karen Homan, Rachel Seeley, Louis Fisher, Sajida Khatri, Katie Smith, Tony Jamieson, Victoria Speed, Carol A Roberts, Amir Mehrkar, Sebastian Bacon, Brian MacKenna, Ben Goldacre
{"title":"Safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing: OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20.5 million adults' electronic health records.","authors":"Karen Homan, Rachel Seeley, Louis Fisher, Sajida Khatri, Katie Smith, Tony Jamieson, Victoria Speed, Carol A Roberts, Amir Mehrkar, Sebastian Bacon, Brian MacKenna, Ben Goldacre","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic many patients were switched from warfarin to direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which require the creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated to ensure the correct dose is prescribed to avoid bleeding or reduced efficacy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the study population proportion prescribed a DOAC. Of these, the proportion with recorded: weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, CrCl and atrial fibrillation (AF). To analyse the proportion of patients with recorded AF and CrCl prescribed a recommended DOAC dose.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 20.5 million adult NHS patients' electronic health records (EHRs) in England in the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform (January 2018-February 2023).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients on DOACs were analysed for age, sex, recorded weight, eGFR, creatinine, CrCl and AF. Prescribed DOAC doses in patients with recorded AF were compared with recommended doses for recorded CrCl and determined as either recommended, higher than recommended (overdose), or lower than recommended (underdose).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In February 2023, weight, eGFR, creatinine, CrCl, and AF were recorded in 72.8%, 92.4%, 94.3%, 73.5%, and 73.9% of study population, respectively. Both AF and CrCl were recorded for 56.7% of patients. Of these, 86.2% received the recommended, and 13.8% non-recommended, DOAC doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CrCl is not recorded for a substantial number of patients on DOACs. We recommend that national organisations tasked with safety, collectively update guidance on the appropriate weight to use in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, clarify that CrCl is not equivalent to eGFR, and work with GP clinical system suppliers to standardise the calculation of CrCl in the EHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic many patients were switched from warfarin to direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which require the creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated to ensure the correct dose is prescribed to avoid bleeding or reduced efficacy.

Aim: To identify the study population proportion prescribed a DOAC. Of these, the proportion with recorded: weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, CrCl and atrial fibrillation (AF). To analyse the proportion of patients with recorded AF and CrCl prescribed a recommended DOAC dose.

Design & setting: A retrospective cohort study of 20.5 million adult NHS patients' electronic health records (EHRs) in England in the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform (January 2018-February 2023).

Method: Patients on DOACs were analysed for age, sex, recorded weight, eGFR, creatinine, CrCl and AF. Prescribed DOAC doses in patients with recorded AF were compared with recommended doses for recorded CrCl and determined as either recommended, higher than recommended (overdose), or lower than recommended (underdose).

Results: In February 2023, weight, eGFR, creatinine, CrCl, and AF were recorded in 72.8%, 92.4%, 94.3%, 73.5%, and 73.9% of study population, respectively. Both AF and CrCl were recorded for 56.7% of patients. Of these, 86.2% received the recommended, and 13.8% non-recommended, DOAC doses.

Conclusion: CrCl is not recorded for a substantial number of patients on DOACs. We recommend that national organisations tasked with safety, collectively update guidance on the appropriate weight to use in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, clarify that CrCl is not equivalent to eGFR, and work with GP clinical system suppliers to standardise the calculation of CrCl in the EHR.

直接作用口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 处方的安全性:OpenSAFELY-TPP 对 2050 万成人电子健康记录的分析。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多患者从使用华法林转为使用 DOAC,而 DOAC 需要计算肌酐清除率,以确保处方剂量正确,避免出血或疗效降低。其中,记录有体重、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、肌酐、肌酐清除率(CrCl)和心房颤动(AF)的患者比例。分析有记录的心房颤动和CrCl患者中获得推荐剂量DOAC处方的比例:对 OpenSAFELY-TPP 平台(2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月)中英格兰 2050 万名 NHS 成年患者的电子健康记录(EHR)进行回顾性队列研究:对使用 DOACs 的患者的年龄、性别、记录体重、eGFR、肌酐、CrCl 和房颤进行分析。将有房颤记录的患者的 DOAC 处方剂量与 CrCl 记录的推荐剂量进行比较,并确定为推荐剂量、剂量不足或剂量过量:2023 年 2 月,72.8%、92.4%、94.3%、73.5% 和 73.9% 的研究对象分别记录了体重、eGFR、肌酐、CrCl、房颤和房颤与 CrCl。56.7%的患者同时记录了 AF 和 CrCl。其中,86.2%的患者服用了推荐剂量的 DOAC,13.8%的患者服用了非推荐剂量的 DOAC:结论:大量使用 DOACs 的患者未记录 CrCl。我们建议负责安全性的国家组织集体更新关于在 Cockcroft-Gault 方程中使用适当权重的指南,明确 CrCl 不等同于 eGFR,并与 GP 临床系统供应商合作,在电子病历中统一 CrCl 的计算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信