National survey on management of spontaneous pneumothorax from emergency department to specialised treatment: room for improvement.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2024.2307648
Søren Helbo Skaarup, Christian B Laursen, Rob J Hallifax, Beenish Iqbal, Uffe Bødtger
{"title":"National survey on management of spontaneous pneumothorax from emergency department to specialised treatment: room for improvement.","authors":"Søren Helbo Skaarup, Christian B Laursen, Rob J Hallifax, Beenish Iqbal, Uffe Bødtger","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2024.2307648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) affects both young, otherwise healthy individuals and older persons with known underlying pulmonary disease. Initial management possibilities are evolving and range from observation to chest tube insertion. SP guidelines suggest an individualized approach based on multiple factors such as symptoms, size of pneumothorax, comorbidity and patient preference.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>With this Danish national survey we aimed to map organization of care including involved specialties, treatment choice, training, and follow-up plans to identify aspects, and optimization of spontaneous pneumothorax management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey developed by the national interest group for pleural medicine was sent to all departments of emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, respiratory medicine, and to relevant departments of abdominal or orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 75 % (47 of 65). Overall, 21% of responding departments had no guideline for SP management, which was provided by multiple specialties with marked heterogeneity in choice of treatment including tube size, management during admission, and referral procedure to follow-up. Few departments required procedure training, and nearly all of the responders called for improvements in management of pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey suggests that SP management and care is delivered heterogeneously across Danish hospitals with marked difference between respiratory physicians, emergency physicians, general surgeons and thoracic surgeons. It is therefore likely that management is sub-optimal. There is a need for a common Danish SP guideline to ensure optimal treatment across involved specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10833110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2024.2307648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) affects both young, otherwise healthy individuals and older persons with known underlying pulmonary disease. Initial management possibilities are evolving and range from observation to chest tube insertion. SP guidelines suggest an individualized approach based on multiple factors such as symptoms, size of pneumothorax, comorbidity and patient preference.

Aim: With this Danish national survey we aimed to map organization of care including involved specialties, treatment choice, training, and follow-up plans to identify aspects, and optimization of spontaneous pneumothorax management.

Method: A survey developed by the national interest group for pleural medicine was sent to all departments of emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, respiratory medicine, and to relevant departments of abdominal or orthopaedic surgery.

Results: The response rate was 75 % (47 of 65). Overall, 21% of responding departments had no guideline for SP management, which was provided by multiple specialties with marked heterogeneity in choice of treatment including tube size, management during admission, and referral procedure to follow-up. Few departments required procedure training, and nearly all of the responders called for improvements in management of pneumothorax.

Conclusion: This survey suggests that SP management and care is delivered heterogeneously across Danish hospitals with marked difference between respiratory physicians, emergency physicians, general surgeons and thoracic surgeons. It is therefore likely that management is sub-optimal. There is a need for a common Danish SP guideline to ensure optimal treatment across involved specialties.

关于自发性气胸从急诊科到专科治疗的管理的全国调查:改进空间。
导言:自发性气胸(SP)既影响健康的年轻人,也影响患有潜在肺部疾病的老年人。最初的处理方法不断变化,从观察到插入胸管不等。SP指南建议根据多种因素(如症状、气胸大小、合并症和患者偏好)采取个体化方法。目的:通过这项丹麦全国性调查,我们旨在绘制医疗组织图,包括涉及的专科、治疗选择、培训和随访计划,以确定自发性气胸管理的各个方面和优化方法:方法:向所有急诊科、胸外科、呼吸内科以及相关的腹部或骨科手术部门发送由全国胸膜医学兴趣小组制定的调查问卷:结果:回复率为 75%(65 个回复中的 47 个)。总体而言,21%的回复科室没有制定SP管理指南,该指南由多个专科提供,在选择治疗方法(包括插管大小、入院期间的管理和随访转诊程序)方面存在明显差异。很少有科室要求进行程序培训,几乎所有的受访者都呼吁改善气胸的管理:这项调查表明,丹麦各家医院在气胸管理和护理方面的做法不尽相同,呼吸内科医生、急诊内科医生、普通外科医生和胸外科医生之间存在明显差异。因此,管理很可能不尽如人意。有必要制定丹麦 SP 共同指南,以确保各相关专科都能提供最佳治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信