Telehealth Collaborative Care Led by Clinical Pharmacists for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: A Propensity Weighted Comparison With Usual Psychiatric Care.

Esti Iturralde, Lisa Fazzolari, Natalie E Slama, Stacey E Alexeeff, Stacy A Sterling, Sameer Awsare, Maria T Koshy, Macy Shia
{"title":"Telehealth Collaborative Care Led by Clinical Pharmacists for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: A Propensity Weighted Comparison With Usual Psychiatric Care.","authors":"Esti Iturralde, Lisa Fazzolari, Natalie E Slama, Stacey E Alexeeff, Stacy A Sterling, Sameer Awsare, Maria T Koshy, Macy Shia","doi":"10.4088/jcp.23m14917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b><i>Objective:</i></b> People with psychosis or bipolar disorder (severe and persistent mental illness [SPMI]) are at high risk for poor psychiatric and chronic illness outcomes, which could be ameliorated through improved health care quality. This study assessed whether a telehealth, collaborative care program managed by psychiatric clinical pharmacists (SPMI Population Care) was associated with improved health care quality for adults with SPMI in a large California health system. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data to compare 968 program enrollees at 6 demonstration sites (Population Care) to 8,339 contemporaneous patients with SPMI at 6 non-program sites (Usual Care). SPMI diagnoses were based on <i>ICD-10-CM</i> diagnostic codes. Primary outcomes were optimal psychotropic medication adherence, guideline-recommended glycemic screening, annual psychiatrist visit, and emergency department use. Difference-in-difference analyses assessed change in outcomes from 12 months pre- to 12 months post-enrollment using overlap weighting with high dimensional propensity scores to balance participant characteristics across groups. Participant data were collected from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From pre- to post-enrollment, Population Care was associated with greater achievement of psychotropic medication adherence and glycemic screening (+6 and +9 percentage points), but unexpectedly with a decrease in annual psychiatrist visits (-6 percentage points) and no significant change in emergency department use, relative to Usual Care. More than 75% of Population Care participants attended an intake and ≥ 1 follow-up visits. Participants with psychosis (26% of sample) had similar results as those with bipolar disorder. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Clinical pharmacist-led telehealth collaborative care has potential to improve psychopharmacologic treatment adherence and recommended disease preventive screening for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder.","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.23m14917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: People with psychosis or bipolar disorder (severe and persistent mental illness [SPMI]) are at high risk for poor psychiatric and chronic illness outcomes, which could be ameliorated through improved health care quality. This study assessed whether a telehealth, collaborative care program managed by psychiatric clinical pharmacists (SPMI Population Care) was associated with improved health care quality for adults with SPMI in a large California health system. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data to compare 968 program enrollees at 6 demonstration sites (Population Care) to 8,339 contemporaneous patients with SPMI at 6 non-program sites (Usual Care). SPMI diagnoses were based on ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. Primary outcomes were optimal psychotropic medication adherence, guideline-recommended glycemic screening, annual psychiatrist visit, and emergency department use. Difference-in-difference analyses assessed change in outcomes from 12 months pre- to 12 months post-enrollment using overlap weighting with high dimensional propensity scores to balance participant characteristics across groups. Participant data were collected from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Results: From pre- to post-enrollment, Population Care was associated with greater achievement of psychotropic medication adherence and glycemic screening (+6 and +9 percentage points), but unexpectedly with a decrease in annual psychiatrist visits (-6 percentage points) and no significant change in emergency department use, relative to Usual Care. More than 75% of Population Care participants attended an intake and ≥ 1 follow-up visits. Participants with psychosis (26% of sample) had similar results as those with bipolar disorder. Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist-led telehealth collaborative care has potential to improve psychopharmacologic treatment adherence and recommended disease preventive screening for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder.
由临床药剂师领导的针对精神病或躁郁症患者的远程医疗协作护理:与普通精神病护理的倾向加权比较。
目的:精神病或躁狂症患者(重性和持续性精神病 [SPMI])是精神疾病和慢性疾病不良后果的高危人群,通过提高医疗保健质量可以改善他们的状况。本研究评估了由精神科临床药剂师管理的远程医疗合作护理项目(SPMI 群体护理)是否与加州大型医疗系统中患有 SPMI 的成人医疗质量的改善有关。研究方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用电子健康记录数据,将 6 个示范点的 968 名项目注册者(人群护理)与 6 个非项目点的 8339 名同期 SPMI 患者(常规护理)进行了比较。SPMI 诊断基于 ICD-10-CM 诊断代码。主要结果包括最佳精神药物治疗依从性、指南推荐的血糖筛查、年度精神科就诊率和急诊室使用率。差异分析评估了加入前 12 个月到加入后 12 个月的结果变化,采用了重叠加权和高维度倾向分数来平衡各组参与者的特征。参与者数据的收集时间为 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日。结果超过 75% 的 "人群保健 "参与者参加了一次入院治疗和≥ 1 次随访。患有精神病的参与者(占样本的 26%)与患有双相情感障碍的参与者结果相似。结论临床药剂师主导的远程医疗协作护理有可能改善精神病或躁郁症患者的精神药物治疗依从性和推荐的疾病预防筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信