Evaluation of generic EMG-Torque models across two Upper-Limb joints

Abstract

Advanced single-use dynamic EMG-torque models require burdensome subject-specific calibration contractions and have historically been assumed to produce lower error than generic models (i.e., models that are identical across subjects and muscles). To investigate this assumption, we studied generic one degree of freedom (DoF) models derived from the ensemble median of subject-specific models, evaluated across subject, DoF and joint. We used elbow (N = 64) and hand-wrist (N = 9) datasets. Subject-specific elbow models performed statistically better [5.79 ± 1.89 %MVT (maximum voluntary torque) error] than generic elbow models (6.21 ± 1.85 %MVT error). However, there were no statistical differences between subject-specific vs. generic models within each hand-wrist DoF. Next, we evaluated generic models across joints. The best hand-wrist generic model had errors of 6.29 ± 1.85 %MVT when applied to the elbow. The elbow generic model had errors of 7.04 ± 2.29 %MVT when applied to the hand-wrist. The generic elbow model was statistically better in both joints, compared to the generic hand-wrist model. Finally, we tested Butterworth filter models (a simpler generic model), finding no statistical differences between optimum Butterworth and subject-specific models. Overall, generic models simplified EMG-torque training without substantive performance degradation and provided the possibility of transfer learning between joints.