Differently managed reed beds are home to Coleoptera communities differing in diversity, overall biomass and size

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Line Holm Andersen, Jeppe Rafn, Cino Pertoldi, Simon Bahrndorff, Dan Bruhn
{"title":"Differently managed reed beds are home to Coleoptera communities differing in diversity, overall biomass and size","authors":"Line Holm Andersen, Jeppe Rafn, Cino Pertoldi, Simon Bahrndorff, Dan Bruhn","doi":"10.1007/s11273-023-09975-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reed beds can be managed for commercial or conservation purposes, with effects on its inhabitants. In this paper, we assess the effect of management on the reed bed Coleoptera community by investigating reed beds subject to winter cutting, winter harvest, short-term unmanaged (3 years), and long-term unmanaged (25 years). Using pit fall traps, we collected Coleoptera across a summer season to estimate Coleoptera biomass, abundance, size, richness, diversity, and community composition across the four types of management of reed beds. Cutting and harvest both show to increase Coleoptera biomass compared to unmanaged reed beds, with the highest Coleoptera abundance found in the harvested reed bed. The species richness and diversity, on the other hand, peaked in the long-term unmanaged reed bed. Community composition differed between the different management types, and across time. Species of conservation concern were most abundant in recently managed areas. These results have implications for the conservation of the reed bed Coleoptera community. First, to maintain a high Coleoptera diversity, some areas must be left unmanaged. Secondly, to secure habitats for species of conservation concern as well as boost the Coleoptera biomass, frequent management of other areas is advised. This mosaic management pattern will also create the overall most species rich reed bed, as unique Coleoptera communities were found in each management type.</p>","PeriodicalId":49363,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands Ecology and Management","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-023-09975-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reed beds can be managed for commercial or conservation purposes, with effects on its inhabitants. In this paper, we assess the effect of management on the reed bed Coleoptera community by investigating reed beds subject to winter cutting, winter harvest, short-term unmanaged (3 years), and long-term unmanaged (25 years). Using pit fall traps, we collected Coleoptera across a summer season to estimate Coleoptera biomass, abundance, size, richness, diversity, and community composition across the four types of management of reed beds. Cutting and harvest both show to increase Coleoptera biomass compared to unmanaged reed beds, with the highest Coleoptera abundance found in the harvested reed bed. The species richness and diversity, on the other hand, peaked in the long-term unmanaged reed bed. Community composition differed between the different management types, and across time. Species of conservation concern were most abundant in recently managed areas. These results have implications for the conservation of the reed bed Coleoptera community. First, to maintain a high Coleoptera diversity, some areas must be left unmanaged. Secondly, to secure habitats for species of conservation concern as well as boost the Coleoptera biomass, frequent management of other areas is advised. This mosaic management pattern will also create the overall most species rich reed bed, as unique Coleoptera communities were found in each management type.

Abstract Image

不同管理方式的芦苇丛是鞘翅目昆虫群落的家园,其多样性、总体生物量和大小各不相同
可以出于商业或保护目的对芦苇床进行管理,从而对其居民产生影响。在本文中,我们通过调查冬季砍伐、冬季收割、短期无人管理(3 年)和长期无人管理(25 年)的芦苇床,评估了管理对芦苇床鞘翅目群落的影响。我们使用坑式秋季诱捕器收集了整个夏季的鞘翅目昆虫,以估算四种芦苇圃管理方式下鞘翅目昆虫的生物量、丰度、大小、丰富度、多样性和群落组成。与无人管理的芦苇滩相比,砍伐和收割都会增加鞘翅目昆虫的生物量,收割的芦苇滩中鞘翅目昆虫的丰度最高。另一方面,物种丰富度和多样性在长期无人管理的芦苇荡中达到顶峰。不同管理类型和不同时期的群落组成各不相同。受保护的物种在近期管理的区域最为丰富。这些结果对保护芦苇荡鞘翅目群落具有重要意义。首先,为了保持较高的鞘翅目昆虫多样性,必须保留一些不受管理的区域。其次,为了确保受保护物种的栖息地并增加鞘翅目昆虫的生物量,建议经常管理其他区域。这种马赛克管理模式也将创造出物种最丰富的芦苇床,因为在每种管理类型中都发现了独特的鞘翅目群落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands Ecology and Management
Wetlands Ecology and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wetlands Ecology and Management is an international journal that publishes authoritative and original articles on topics relevant to freshwater, brackish and marine coastal wetland ecosystems. The Journal serves as a multi-disciplinary forum covering key issues in wetlands science, management, policy and economics. As such, Wetlands Ecology and Management aims to encourage the exchange of information between environmental managers, pure and applied scientists, and national and international authorities on wetlands policy and ecological economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信