Spatiotemporal modelling of $$\hbox {PM}_{2.5}$$ concentrations in Lombardy (Italy): a comparative study

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Philipp Otto, Alessandro Fusta Moro, Jacopo Rodeschini, Qendrim Shaboviq, Rosaria Ignaccolo, Natalia Golini, Michela Cameletti, Paolo Maranzano, Francesco Finazzi, Alessandro Fassò
{"title":"Spatiotemporal modelling of $$\\hbox {PM}_{2.5}$$ concentrations in Lombardy (Italy): a comparative study","authors":"Philipp Otto, Alessandro Fusta Moro, Jacopo Rodeschini, Qendrim Shaboviq, Rosaria Ignaccolo, Natalia Golini, Michela Cameletti, Paolo Maranzano, Francesco Finazzi, Alessandro Fassò","doi":"10.1007/s10651-023-00589-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a comparative analysis of three predictive models with an increasing degree of flexibility: hidden dynamic geostatistical models (HDGM), generalised additive mixed models (GAMM), and the random forest spatiotemporal kriging models (RFSTK). These models are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting <span>\\(\\text {PM}_{2.5}\\)</span> concentrations in Lombardy (North Italy) from 2016 to 2020. Despite differing methodologies, all models demonstrate proficient capture of spatiotemporal patterns within air pollution data with similar out-of-sample performance. Furthermore, the study delves into station-specific analyses, revealing variable model performance contingent on localised conditions. Model interpretation, facilitated by parametric coefficient analysis and partial dependence plots, unveils consistent associations between predictor variables and <span>\\(\\text {PM}_{2.5}\\)</span> concentrations. Despite nuanced variations in modelling spatiotemporal correlations, all models effectively accounted for the underlying dependence. In summary, this study underscores the efficacy of conventional techniques in modelling correlated spatiotemporal data, concurrently highlighting the complementary potential of Machine Learning and classical statistical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-023-00589-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of three predictive models with an increasing degree of flexibility: hidden dynamic geostatistical models (HDGM), generalised additive mixed models (GAMM), and the random forest spatiotemporal kriging models (RFSTK). These models are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting \(\text {PM}_{2.5}\) concentrations in Lombardy (North Italy) from 2016 to 2020. Despite differing methodologies, all models demonstrate proficient capture of spatiotemporal patterns within air pollution data with similar out-of-sample performance. Furthermore, the study delves into station-specific analyses, revealing variable model performance contingent on localised conditions. Model interpretation, facilitated by parametric coefficient analysis and partial dependence plots, unveils consistent associations between predictor variables and \(\text {PM}_{2.5}\) concentrations. Despite nuanced variations in modelling spatiotemporal correlations, all models effectively accounted for the underlying dependence. In summary, this study underscores the efficacy of conventional techniques in modelling correlated spatiotemporal data, concurrently highlighting the complementary potential of Machine Learning and classical statistical approaches.

Abstract Image

意大利伦巴第地区 $$\hbox {PM}_{2.5}$$ 浓度的时空模型:一项比较研究
本研究对三种预测模型进行了比较分析,这三种模型的灵活性越来越高:隐藏动态地理统计模型(HDGM)、广义加法混合模型(GAMM)和随机森林时空克里金模型(RFSTK)。评估了这些模型在预测 2016 年至 2020 年伦巴第大区(意大利北部)(\text {PM}_{2.5}\)浓度方面的有效性。尽管方法不同,但所有模型都能熟练捕捉空气污染数据中的时空模式,并具有相似的样本外性能。此外,该研究还深入分析了特定站点的情况,揭示了因当地条件而异的模型性能。参数系数分析和偏倚图有助于模型解释,揭示了预测变量与 \(text {PM}_{2.5}\) 浓度之间的一致联系。尽管在模拟时空相关性方面存在细微差别,但所有模型都有效地解释了潜在的依赖关系。总之,这项研究强调了传统技术在建立相关时空数据模型方面的功效,同时也凸显了机器学习和经典统计方法的互补潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Environmental and Ecological Statistics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues. Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics. Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信