Microbiota-Short Chain Fatty Acid Relationships and Microbial Substrate Preferences Vary Across the Spectrum of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

Andrea Shin, Yue Xing, Mohammed Rayyan Waseem, Robert Siwiec, Toyia James-Stevenson, Nicholas Rogers, Matthew Bohm, John Wo, Carolyn Lockett, Anita Gupta, Jhalka Kadariya, Evelyn Toh, Rachel Anderson, Huiping Xu, Xiang Gao
{"title":"Microbiota-Short Chain Fatty Acid Relationships and Microbial Substrate Preferences Vary Across the Spectrum of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)","authors":"Andrea Shin, Yue Xing, Mohammed Rayyan Waseem, Robert Siwiec, Toyia James-Stevenson, Nicholas Rogers, Matthew Bohm, John Wo, Carolyn Lockett, Anita Gupta, Jhalka Kadariya, Evelyn Toh, Rachel Anderson, Huiping Xu, Xiang Gao","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.31.24302084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Identifying microbial targets in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is challenged by dynamic microbiota-metabolite-host interactions. We aimed to assess microbial features associated with short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and determine if features were related to IBS symptoms, subtypes, and endophenotypes. Design: We performed an observational study of stool microbial metagenomes, stool SCFA, and IBS traits (stool form, stool bile acids, and colonic transit) in patients with IBS (IBS with constipation [IBS-C] IBS with diarrhea [IBS-D]) and healthy controls. We analyzed associations of microbiome composition with stool SCFA to identify microbe-SCFA relationships that were shared and distinct across groups. We compared gut microbiome-encoded potential for substrate utilization across groups and within a subset of participants selected by stool characteristics. In IBS-D, we compared stool microbiomes of patients with and without bile acid malabsorption (BAM). Results: Overall stool microbiome composition and abundances of individual taxa differed between groups. Increased abundances of several bacterial species were observed in IBS-D including Dorea sp. CAG:317.. Microbes-SCFA relationships varied across groups after accounting for transit and bile acids. Significant microbe-SCFA were common in IBS-D and several SCFA-producing species were inversely correlated with SCFA. Among participants selected by stool form characteristics, functional profiling demonstrated differential abundances of microbial genes/pathways for SCFA metabolism and degradation of carbohydrates and mucin across groups. SCFA-producing taxa were reduced in IBS-D with BAM. Conclusion: Microbe-SCFA associations differ across IBS subtypes and traits. Altered substrate preferences offer insights into functional microbiome traits and could be used as novel microbial IBS biomarkers.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identifying microbial targets in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is challenged by dynamic microbiota-metabolite-host interactions. We aimed to assess microbial features associated with short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and determine if features were related to IBS symptoms, subtypes, and endophenotypes. Design: We performed an observational study of stool microbial metagenomes, stool SCFA, and IBS traits (stool form, stool bile acids, and colonic transit) in patients with IBS (IBS with constipation [IBS-C] IBS with diarrhea [IBS-D]) and healthy controls. We analyzed associations of microbiome composition with stool SCFA to identify microbe-SCFA relationships that were shared and distinct across groups. We compared gut microbiome-encoded potential for substrate utilization across groups and within a subset of participants selected by stool characteristics. In IBS-D, we compared stool microbiomes of patients with and without bile acid malabsorption (BAM). Results: Overall stool microbiome composition and abundances of individual taxa differed between groups. Increased abundances of several bacterial species were observed in IBS-D including Dorea sp. CAG:317.. Microbes-SCFA relationships varied across groups after accounting for transit and bile acids. Significant microbe-SCFA were common in IBS-D and several SCFA-producing species were inversely correlated with SCFA. Among participants selected by stool form characteristics, functional profiling demonstrated differential abundances of microbial genes/pathways for SCFA metabolism and degradation of carbohydrates and mucin across groups. SCFA-producing taxa were reduced in IBS-D with BAM. Conclusion: Microbe-SCFA associations differ across IBS subtypes and traits. Altered substrate preferences offer insights into functional microbiome traits and could be used as novel microbial IBS biomarkers.
肠易激综合征 (IBS) 不同病程中微生物群与短链脂肪酸的关系以及微生物对底物的偏好各不相同
目的:确定肠易激综合征(IBS)的微生物靶标面临着微生物群-代谢产物-宿主之间动态相互作用的挑战。我们旨在评估与短链脂肪酸(SCFA)相关的微生物特征,并确定这些特征是否与肠易激综合征的症状、亚型和内表型相关。设计:我们对 IBS 患者(便秘型 IBS [IBS-C] 腹泻型 IBS [IBS-D])和健康对照组的粪便微生物元基因组、粪便 SCFA 和 IBS 特征(粪便形态、粪便胆汁酸和结肠转运)进行了观察研究。我们分析了微生物组组成与粪便 SCFA 之间的关联,以确定各组间共享和不同的微生物-SCFA 关系。我们比较了不同组别和根据粪便特征选择的参与者子集的肠道微生物编码的底物利用潜力。在 IBS-D 中,我们比较了胆汁酸吸收不良 (BAM) 和非胆汁酸吸收不良 (BAM) 患者的粪便微生物组。结果总体粪便微生物组的组成和单个分类群的丰度在不同组间存在差异。在 IBS-D 组中观察到一些细菌物种的丰度增加,包括 Dorea sp. CAG:317...在考虑转运酸和胆汁酸后,微生物-SCFA 关系在不同组间存在差异。在 IBS-D 组中,微生物与 SCFA 的关系显著,一些产生 SCFA 的菌种与 SCFA 成反比。在根据粪便形态特征筛选出的参与者中,功能分析表明不同组别的 SCFA 代谢以及碳水化合物和粘蛋白降解的微生物基因/通路丰度不同。IBS-D 和 BAM 中产生 SCFA 的类群减少。结论不同 IBS 亚型和性状的微生物与 SCFA 的关系各不相同。底物偏好的改变有助于深入了解功能性微生物组的特征,并可用作新型微生物 IBS 生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信