Coronary CTA and Quantitative Cardiac CT Perfusion (CCTP) in Coronary Artery Disease

Hao Wu, Yingnan Song, Ammar Hoori, Ananya Subramaniam, Juhwan Lee, Justin Kim, Tao Hu, Sadeer Al-Kindi, Wei-Ming Huang, Chun-Ho Yun, Chung-Lieh Hung, Sanjay Rajagopalan, David L. Wilson
{"title":"Coronary CTA and Quantitative Cardiac CT Perfusion (CCTP) in Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"Hao Wu, Yingnan Song, Ammar Hoori, Ananya Subramaniam, Juhwan Lee, Justin Kim, Tao Hu, Sadeer Al-Kindi, Wei-Ming Huang, Chun-Ho Yun, Chung-Lieh Hung, Sanjay Rajagopalan, David L. Wilson","doi":"arxiv-2401.17433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assessed the benefit of combining stress cardiac CT perfusion (CCTP)\nmyocardial blood flow (MBF) with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using our\ninnovative CCTP software. By combining CCTA and CCTP, one can uniquely identify\na flow limiting stenosis (obstructive-lesion + low-MBF) versus MVD\n(no-obstructive-lesion + low-MBF. We retrospectively evaluated 104 patients\nwith suspected CAD, including 18 with diabetes, who underwent CCTA+CCTP. Whole\nheart and territorial MBF was assessed using our automated pipeline for CCTP\nanalysis that included beam hardening correction; temporal scan registration;\nautomated segmentation; fast, accurate, robust MBF estimation; and\nvisualization. Stenosis severity was scored using the CCTA\ncoronary-artery-disease-reporting-and-data-system (CAD-RADS), with obstructive\nstenosis deemed as CAD-RADS>=3. We established a threshold MBF\n(MBF=199-mL/min-100g) for normal perfusion. In patients with CAD-RADS>=3,\n28/37(76%) patients showed ischemia in the corresponding territory. Two\npatients with obstructive disease had normal perfusion, suggesting collaterals\nand/or a hemodynamically insignificant stenosis. Among diabetics, 10 of 18\n(56%) demonstrated diffuse ischemia consistent with MVD. Among non-diabetics,\nonly 6% had MVD. Sex-specific prevalence of MVD was 21%/24% (M/F). On a\nper-vessel basis (n=256), MBF showed a significant difference between\nterritories with and without obstructive stenosis (165 +/- 61 mL/min-100g vs.\n274 +/- 62 mL/min-100g, p <0.05). A significant and negative rank correlation\n(rho=-0.53, p<0.05) between territory MBF and CAD-RADS was seen. CCTA in\nconjunction with a new automated quantitative CCTP approach can augment the\ninterpretation of CAD, enabling the distinction of ischemia due to obstructive\nlesions and MVD.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2401.17433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assessed the benefit of combining stress cardiac CT perfusion (CCTP) myocardial blood flow (MBF) with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using our innovative CCTP software. By combining CCTA and CCTP, one can uniquely identify a flow limiting stenosis (obstructive-lesion + low-MBF) versus MVD (no-obstructive-lesion + low-MBF. We retrospectively evaluated 104 patients with suspected CAD, including 18 with diabetes, who underwent CCTA+CCTP. Whole heart and territorial MBF was assessed using our automated pipeline for CCTP analysis that included beam hardening correction; temporal scan registration; automated segmentation; fast, accurate, robust MBF estimation; and visualization. Stenosis severity was scored using the CCTA coronary-artery-disease-reporting-and-data-system (CAD-RADS), with obstructive stenosis deemed as CAD-RADS>=3. We established a threshold MBF (MBF=199-mL/min-100g) for normal perfusion. In patients with CAD-RADS>=3, 28/37(76%) patients showed ischemia in the corresponding territory. Two patients with obstructive disease had normal perfusion, suggesting collaterals and/or a hemodynamically insignificant stenosis. Among diabetics, 10 of 18 (56%) demonstrated diffuse ischemia consistent with MVD. Among non-diabetics, only 6% had MVD. Sex-specific prevalence of MVD was 21%/24% (M/F). On a per-vessel basis (n=256), MBF showed a significant difference between territories with and without obstructive stenosis (165 +/- 61 mL/min-100g vs. 274 +/- 62 mL/min-100g, p <0.05). A significant and negative rank correlation (rho=-0.53, p<0.05) between territory MBF and CAD-RADS was seen. CCTA in conjunction with a new automated quantitative CCTP approach can augment the interpretation of CAD, enabling the distinction of ischemia due to obstructive lesions and MVD.
冠状动脉 CTA 和冠状动脉疾病的定量心脏 CT 灌注 (CCTP)
我们使用创新的 CCTP 软件评估了将应激心脏 CT 灌注(CCTP)心肌血流(MBF)与冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)相结合的益处。通过结合 CCTA 和 CCTP,可以唯一识别血流受限狭窄(阻塞性病变 + 低 MBF)和 MVD(无阻塞性病变 + 低 MBF)。我们回顾性评估了 104 位接受 CCTA+CCTP 检查的疑似 CAD 患者,其中包括 18 位糖尿病患者。使用我们的 CCTPanalysis 自动流水线评估了全心和全区 MBF,该流水线包括光束硬化校正、时间扫描注册、自动分割、快速、准确、稳健的 MBF 估计和可视化。狭窄严重程度采用 CCTA 冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS)进行评分,CAD-RADS>=3 为梗阻性狭窄。我们确定了正常灌注的阈值 MBF(MBF=199-毫升/分钟-100 克)。在 CAD-RADS>=3 的患者中,28/37(76%)例患者的相应区域出现缺血。有两名阻塞性疾病患者的血流灌注正常,这表明存在通路和/或血流动力学上不明显的狭窄。在糖尿病患者中,18 人中有 10 人(56%)表现出与 MVD 一致的弥漫性缺血。在非糖尿病患者中,只有 6% 患有 MVD。MVD的性别患病率为21%/24%(男/女)。按每血管计算(n=256),MBF 在有阻塞性狭窄和无阻塞性狭窄的地区之间存在显著差异(165 +/- 61 mL/min-100g vs.274 +/- 62 mL/min-100g,p <0.05)。区域 MBF 与 CAD-RADS 之间存在明显的负相关(rho=-0.53,P<0.05)。结合新型自动定量 CCTP 方法的 CCTA 可以增强对 CAD 的解释,区分梗阻性缺血和 MVD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信