Using power analysis and spatial prioritization to evaluate the design of a forest bird monitoring programme

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Oryx Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1017/s0030605323001382
Darren M. Southwell, Adam Smart, Samuel D. Merson, Katherine E. Selwood, Nicholas A. Macgregor
{"title":"Using power analysis and spatial prioritization to evaluate the design of a forest bird monitoring programme","authors":"Darren M. Southwell, Adam Smart, Samuel D. Merson, Katherine E. Selwood, Nicholas A. Macgregor","doi":"10.1017/s0030605323001382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biodiversity monitoring programmes should be designed with sufficient statistical power to detect population change. Here we evaluated the statistical power of monitoring to detect declines in the occupancy of forest birds on Christmas Island, Australia. We fitted zero-inflated binomial models to 3 years of repeat detection data (2011, 2013 and 2015) to estimate single-visit detection probabilities for four species of concern: the Christmas Island imperial pigeon <span>Ducula whartoni</span>, Christmas Island white-eye <span>Zosterops natalis</span>, Christmas Island thrush <span>Turdus poliocephalus erythropleurus</span> and Christmas Island emerald dove <span>Chalcophaps indica natalis</span>. We combined detection probabilities with maps of occupancy to simulate data collected over the next 10 years for alternative monitoring designs and for different declines in occupancy (10–50%). Specifically, we explored how the number of sites (60, 128, 300, 500), the interval between surveys (1–5 years), the number of repeat visits (2–4 visits) and the location of sites influenced power. Power was high (&gt; 80%) for the imperial pigeon, white-eye and thrush for most scenarios, except for when only 60 sites were surveyed or a 10% decline in occupancy was simulated over 10 years. For the emerald dove, which is the rarest of the four species and has a patchy distribution, power was low in almost all scenarios tested. Prioritizing monitoring towards core habitat for this species only slightly improved power to detect declines. Our study demonstrates how data collected during the early stages of monitoring can be analysed in simulation tools to fine-tune future survey design decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19694,"journal":{"name":"Oryx","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oryx","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605323001382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring programmes should be designed with sufficient statistical power to detect population change. Here we evaluated the statistical power of monitoring to detect declines in the occupancy of forest birds on Christmas Island, Australia. We fitted zero-inflated binomial models to 3 years of repeat detection data (2011, 2013 and 2015) to estimate single-visit detection probabilities for four species of concern: the Christmas Island imperial pigeon Ducula whartoni, Christmas Island white-eye Zosterops natalis, Christmas Island thrush Turdus poliocephalus erythropleurus and Christmas Island emerald dove Chalcophaps indica natalis. We combined detection probabilities with maps of occupancy to simulate data collected over the next 10 years for alternative monitoring designs and for different declines in occupancy (10–50%). Specifically, we explored how the number of sites (60, 128, 300, 500), the interval between surveys (1–5 years), the number of repeat visits (2–4 visits) and the location of sites influenced power. Power was high (> 80%) for the imperial pigeon, white-eye and thrush for most scenarios, except for when only 60 sites were surveyed or a 10% decline in occupancy was simulated over 10 years. For the emerald dove, which is the rarest of the four species and has a patchy distribution, power was low in almost all scenarios tested. Prioritizing monitoring towards core habitat for this species only slightly improved power to detect declines. Our study demonstrates how data collected during the early stages of monitoring can be analysed in simulation tools to fine-tune future survey design decisions.

利用功率分析和空间优先排序评估林鸟监测计划的设计
生物多样性监测计划的设计应具有足够的统计能力来检测种群变化。在此,我们评估了监测发现澳大利亚圣诞岛森林鸟类栖息率下降的统计能力。我们对3年(2011年、2013年和2015年)的重复检测数据拟合了零膨胀二叉模型,以估算4种受关注物种的单次检测概率:圣诞岛帝王鸽(Ducula whartoni)、圣诞岛白眼鸽(Zosterops natalis)、圣诞岛鸫(Turdus poliocephalus erythropleurus)和圣诞岛绿宝石鸽(Chalcophaps indica natalis)。我们将检测概率与栖息地分布图相结合,模拟了在未来 10 年中收集的数据,这些数据适用于不同的监测设计和不同的栖息地下降率(10%-50%)。具体来说,我们探讨了监测点数量(60、128、300、500)、调查间隔(1-5 年)、重复访问次数(2-4 次)和监测点位置对监测能力的影响。除了仅调查 60 个地点或模拟 10 年内占用率下降 10%的情况外,在大多数情况下,帝王鸽、白眼鸽和鸫鸟的计算功率都很高(> 80%)。翡翠鸽是四个物种中最稀有的一种,分布零散,几乎在所有测试方案中,翡翠鸽的监测能力都很低。对这一物种的核心栖息地进行优先监测只能略微提高检测衰退的能力。我们的研究展示了如何利用模拟工具分析监测早期阶段收集的数据,从而对未来的调查设计决策进行微调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oryx
Oryx 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: ORYX—THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION, a quarterly journal from Fauna & Flora International, publishes research on biodiversity conservation, conservation policy and sustainable use, and the interactions of these matters with social, economic and political issues. The journal has a particular interest in material with the potential to improve conservation management and practice. Explore the map for details of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信