Health Information Technology Supporting Adherence Memory Disorder Patients: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Safa Elkefi, Saul Blecker, Yuval Bitan
{"title":"Health Information Technology Supporting Adherence Memory Disorder Patients: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Safa Elkefi, Saul Blecker, Yuval Bitan","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n<b>Background</b> People with memory disorders have difficulty adhering to treatments. With technological advances, it remains important to investigate the potential of health information technology (HIT) in supporting medication adherence among them.</p> <p>\n<b>Objectives</b> This review investigates the role of HIT in supporting adherence to medication and therapies among patients with memory issues. It also captures the factors that impact technology adherence interventions.</p> <p>\n<b>Methods</b> We searched the literature for relevant publications published until March 15, 2023, using technology to support adherence among patients with memory issues (dementia, Alzheimer's, amnesia, mild cognitive impairment, memory loss, etc.). The review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a quality assessment of the papers following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p> <p>\n<b>Results</b> Fifteen studies were included after carefully reviewing the 3,773 articles in the search. Methodological quality, as appraised, ranged from 80 to 100% with eight studies rated 100%. The studies overall did not have a high risk of bias. Thus, all of the 15 studies were included. Technologies investigated were classified into four groups based on their impact: therapeutic patient education, simplifying treatment regimens, early follow-up visits and short-term treatment goals, and reminder programs. Different technologies were used (automatic drug dispensers or boxes, mobile health-based interventions, game-based interventions, e-health-based interventions, patient portals, and virtual reality). The factors impacting patients' adherence to technology-based treatment and medication were clustered into human–computer interaction and integration challenges.</p> <p>\n<b>Conclusion</b> This study contributes to the literature by classifying the technologies that supported medication adherence among patients with memory issues in four groups. It also explores and presents the possible limitations of existing solutions to drive future research in supporting care for people with memory disorders.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background People with memory disorders have difficulty adhering to treatments. With technological advances, it remains important to investigate the potential of health information technology (HIT) in supporting medication adherence among them.

Objectives This review investigates the role of HIT in supporting adherence to medication and therapies among patients with memory issues. It also captures the factors that impact technology adherence interventions.

Methods We searched the literature for relevant publications published until March 15, 2023, using technology to support adherence among patients with memory issues (dementia, Alzheimer's, amnesia, mild cognitive impairment, memory loss, etc.). The review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a quality assessment of the papers following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results Fifteen studies were included after carefully reviewing the 3,773 articles in the search. Methodological quality, as appraised, ranged from 80 to 100% with eight studies rated 100%. The studies overall did not have a high risk of bias. Thus, all of the 15 studies were included. Technologies investigated were classified into four groups based on their impact: therapeutic patient education, simplifying treatment regimens, early follow-up visits and short-term treatment goals, and reminder programs. Different technologies were used (automatic drug dispensers or boxes, mobile health-based interventions, game-based interventions, e-health-based interventions, patient portals, and virtual reality). The factors impacting patients' adherence to technology-based treatment and medication were clustered into human–computer interaction and integration challenges.

Conclusion This study contributes to the literature by classifying the technologies that supported medication adherence among patients with memory issues in four groups. It also explores and presents the possible limitations of existing solutions to drive future research in supporting care for people with memory disorders.

支持记忆障碍患者坚持治疗的医疗信息技术:系统性文献综述
背景记忆障碍患者很难坚持治疗。随着技术的进步,研究医疗信息技术(HIT)在支持患者坚持用药方面的潜力仍然非常重要。目的 本综述研究了 HIT 在支持记忆障碍患者坚持用药和治疗方面的作用。此外,本综述还探讨了影响坚持技术干预的因素。方法 我们检索了截至 2023 年 3 月 15 日发表的相关文献,这些文献使用技术来支持有记忆问题的患者(痴呆症、阿尔茨海默氏症、健忘症、轻度认知障碍、记忆力减退等)坚持用药。本综述按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis,PRISMA)指南进行报告。我们按照混合方法评估工具对论文进行了质量评估。结果 在仔细审阅了 3773 篇检索文章后,我们纳入了 15 项研究。经评估,方法学质量从 80% 到 100% 不等,其中 8 项研究的方法学质量被评为 100%。这些研究的总体偏倚风险不高。因此,所有 15 项研究均被纳入。所调查的技术根据其影响分为四类:治疗性患者教育、简化治疗方案、早期随访和短期治疗目标以及提醒计划。研究中使用了不同的技术(自动配药器或配药盒、基于移动医疗的干预、基于游戏的干预、基于电子医疗的干预、患者门户网站和虚拟现实)。影响患者坚持基于技术的治疗和用药的因素分为人机交互和整合挑战。结论 本研究将支持有记忆问题的患者坚持服药的技术分为四类,为文献做出了贡献。它还探讨并提出了现有解决方案可能存在的局限性,以推动未来支持记忆障碍患者护理的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信