Robotic trials in arthroplasty surgery.

Chetan Khatri, Andrew Metcalfe, Peter Wall, Martin Underwood, Fares S Haddad, Edward T Davis
{"title":"Robotic trials in arthroplasty surgery.","authors":"Chetan Khatri, Andrew Metcalfe, Peter Wall, Martin Underwood, Fares S Haddad, Edward T Davis","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0711.r1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) are largely successful procedures; however, both have variable outcomes, resulting in some patients being dissatisfied with the outcome. Surgeons are turning to technologies such as robotic-assisted surgery in an attempt to improve outcomes. Robust studies are needed to find out if these innovations are really benefitting patients. The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and Cost Effectiveness Randomised Controlled Trials (RACER) trials are multicentre, patient-blinded randomized controlled trials. The patients have primary osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The operation is Mako-assisted THA or TKA and the control groups have operations using conventional instruments. The primary clinical outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months, and there is a built-in analysis of cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include early pain, the alignment of the components, and medium- to long-term outcomes. This annotation outlines the need to assess these technologies and discusses the design and challenges when conducting such trials, including surgical workflows, isolating the effect of the operation, blinding, and assessing the learning curve. Finally, the future of robotic surgery is discussed, including the need to contemporaneously introduce and evaluate such technologies.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0711.r1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) are largely successful procedures; however, both have variable outcomes, resulting in some patients being dissatisfied with the outcome. Surgeons are turning to technologies such as robotic-assisted surgery in an attempt to improve outcomes. Robust studies are needed to find out if these innovations are really benefitting patients. The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and Cost Effectiveness Randomised Controlled Trials (RACER) trials are multicentre, patient-blinded randomized controlled trials. The patients have primary osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The operation is Mako-assisted THA or TKA and the control groups have operations using conventional instruments. The primary clinical outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months, and there is a built-in analysis of cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include early pain, the alignment of the components, and medium- to long-term outcomes. This annotation outlines the need to assess these technologies and discusses the design and challenges when conducting such trials, including surgical workflows, isolating the effect of the operation, blinding, and assessing the learning curve. Finally, the future of robotic surgery is discussed, including the need to contemporaneously introduce and evaluate such technologies.
关节置换手术中的机器人试验。
全髋关节和膝关节置换术(THA、TKA)在很大程度上是成功的手术,但这两种手术的疗效各不相同,导致一些患者对疗效不满意。外科医生正转向机器人辅助手术等技术,试图改善手术效果。要了解这些创新是否真正造福于患者,还需要进行大量的研究。机器人关节成形术临床和成本效益随机对照试验(RACER)是一项多中心、患者盲法随机对照试验。患者患有原发性髋关节或膝关节骨性关节炎。对照组使用传统器械进行手术。主要临床结果是12个月时的 "遗忘关节评分",并对成本效益进行内置分析。次要结果包括早期疼痛、组件对齐情况以及中长期结果。本注释概述了评估这些技术的必要性,并讨论了进行此类试验时的设计和挑战,包括手术工作流程、分离手术效果、盲法和评估学习曲线。最后还讨论了机器人手术的未来,包括同时引进和评估此类技术的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信