Different people, different wild: Comparing and mapping wilderness representation in Wuyishan National Park, China

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Aifang Weng , Lingyun Liao , Yue Cao , Steve Carver , Li Lin , Siyuan Shen , Zhengduo Xu , Jianwen Dong , Siren Lan , Rui Yang
{"title":"Different people, different wild: Comparing and mapping wilderness representation in Wuyishan National Park, China","authors":"Aifang Weng ,&nbsp;Lingyun Liao ,&nbsp;Yue Cao ,&nbsp;Steve Carver ,&nbsp;Li Lin ,&nbsp;Siyuan Shen ,&nbsp;Zhengduo Xu ,&nbsp;Jianwen Dong ,&nbsp;Siren Lan ,&nbsp;Rui Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is essential to better integrate wilderness representations of different stakeholders into wilderness conservation. The way in which local residents and other stakeholders frame the construction of wilderness of protected areas in developing countries are poorly understood. In these areas, land use policy and decision may lead to conflicts. This study aims to explore existing public wilderness representations using a questionnaire survey (<em>n</em> = 514) administered amongst tourists and other stakeholders in the Wuyishan National Park, in southeast China. The spatial differences in public representations of wilderness across different stakeholder groups were compared against expert knowledge. We found that integrated wilderness representation maps of different stakeholder groups were consistent, namely ‘area where wild animals live’, ‘area with no human influence’, ‘a barren and lonely area’. However, three sub-representations of the individual stakeholders varied significantly. Moreover, expert-based wilderness mapping did not reflect public representations accurately, and an integrated wilderness quality map considering wilderness representations across both stakeholders and experts can better identify detailed wilderness areas. Our study provides new insights and technical support for future exploration of wilderness conservation and mapping in China and other countries with insufficient awareness of wilderness values and investigations in a regional scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 144-156"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000779/pdfft?md5=4adb074a4a011f0430e4accfab1af370&pid=1-s2.0-S2666683923000779-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000779","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is essential to better integrate wilderness representations of different stakeholders into wilderness conservation. The way in which local residents and other stakeholders frame the construction of wilderness of protected areas in developing countries are poorly understood. In these areas, land use policy and decision may lead to conflicts. This study aims to explore existing public wilderness representations using a questionnaire survey (n = 514) administered amongst tourists and other stakeholders in the Wuyishan National Park, in southeast China. The spatial differences in public representations of wilderness across different stakeholder groups were compared against expert knowledge. We found that integrated wilderness representation maps of different stakeholder groups were consistent, namely ‘area where wild animals live’, ‘area with no human influence’, ‘a barren and lonely area’. However, three sub-representations of the individual stakeholders varied significantly. Moreover, expert-based wilderness mapping did not reflect public representations accurately, and an integrated wilderness quality map considering wilderness representations across both stakeholders and experts can better identify detailed wilderness areas. Our study provides new insights and technical support for future exploration of wilderness conservation and mapping in China and other countries with insufficient awareness of wilderness values and investigations in a regional scale.

Abstract Image

不同的人,不同的野性:比较和描绘中国武夷山国家公园的野性表征
必须将不同利益相关者对荒野的表述更好地融入荒野保护中。人们对发展中国家当地居民和其他利益相关者如何构建保护区荒野的方式知之甚少。在这些地区,土地使用政策和决策可能会导致冲突。本研究旨在通过对中国东南部武夷山国家公园的游客和其他利益相关者进行问卷调查(n = 514),探索现有的公众荒野表征。我们将不同利益相关者群体的公众荒野表征的空间差异与专家知识进行了比较。我们发现,不同利益相关者群体的综合荒野表征图是一致的,即 "野生动物生活的区域"、"没有人类影响的区域"、"贫瘠和孤独的区域"。然而,单个利益相关者的三个子表征却有很大差异。此外,基于专家的荒野地图并不能准确反映公众的表述,而综合考虑利益相关者和专家的荒野表述的荒野质量地图可以更好地识别详细的荒野区域。我们的研究为中国和其他对荒野价值认识不足的国家今后在区域尺度上探索荒野保护和绘图提供了新的见解和技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信