Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.

Q4 Medicine
T Haruštiak, S Jaroščiaková, M Šnajdauf, A Pazdro, R Lischke
{"title":"Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.","authors":"T Haruštiak, S Jaroščiaková, M Šnajdauf, A Pazdro, R Lischke","doi":"10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and better quality of life compared to open esophagectomy in patients with comparable oncological outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery represents the next step in the development of mini- mally invasive surgery. We aim to present the results of a pilot cohort of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial cohort of patients with RAMIE was retrospectively analyzed. Operative characteristics, histopathological results, postoperative course, incidence of complications, and postoperative mortality were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3/2022 to 6/2023, a total of 31 patients underwent RAMIE at our institution, including hybrid RAMIE (robotic abdomen, open chest) in 11 and total RAMIE in 20 patients. Most patients were male, had locally advanced tumors, predominantly adenocarcinoma and neoadjuvant treat- ment. Thirty patients had Ivor-Lewis and one patient had McKeown esophagectomy. The median total operative time was 495 minutes and median blood loss was 200 mL. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients. A median of 26 lymph nodes were removed. Postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications occurred in 9 (29%) patients. Four (13%) patients required reoperation. Anastomotic leak was found in 5 (16%) and pneumonia in 9 (29%) patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days. One patient died in the postoperative period. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 0% and 3.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our initial experience shows that RAMIE is a safe surgical procedure and we consider its implementation at our institution to be success- ful. After overcoming the learning curve, we hope to reduce the operative time and increase the medical benefit for the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"102 11","pages":"422-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and better quality of life compared to open esophagectomy in patients with comparable oncological outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery represents the next step in the development of mini- mally invasive surgery. We aim to present the results of a pilot cohort of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

Methods: An initial cohort of patients with RAMIE was retrospectively analyzed. Operative characteristics, histopathological results, postoperative course, incidence of complications, and postoperative mortality were evaluated.

Results: From 3/2022 to 6/2023, a total of 31 patients underwent RAMIE at our institution, including hybrid RAMIE (robotic abdomen, open chest) in 11 and total RAMIE in 20 patients. Most patients were male, had locally advanced tumors, predominantly adenocarcinoma and neoadjuvant treat- ment. Thirty patients had Ivor-Lewis and one patient had McKeown esophagectomy. The median total operative time was 495 minutes and median blood loss was 200 mL. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients. A median of 26 lymph nodes were removed. Postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications occurred in 9 (29%) patients. Four (13%) patients required reoperation. Anastomotic leak was found in 5 (16%) and pneumonia in 9 (29%) patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days. One patient died in the postoperative period. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 0% and 3.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our initial experience shows that RAMIE is a safe surgical procedure and we consider its implementation at our institution to be success- ful. After overcoming the learning curve, we hope to reduce the operative time and increase the medical benefit for the patient.

机器人辅助微创食管切除术--我们的初次体验。
简介:与开腹食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术的术后发病率更低,患者的生活质量更高,且肿瘤治疗效果相当。机器人辅助手术是微创手术发展的下一步。我们旨在介绍一组接受机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)患者的试验结果:方法:我们对首批接受机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)的患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了手术特点、组织病理学结果、术后过程、并发症发生率和术后死亡率:自2022年3月至2023年6月,共有31名患者在我院接受了RAMIE手术,其中11名患者接受了混合RAMIE(机器人腹部、开胸)手术,20名患者接受了全RAMIE手术。大多数患者为男性,局部晚期肿瘤,以腺癌为主,接受过新辅助治疗。30 名患者接受了 Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术,1 名患者接受了 McKeown 食管切除术。中位手术时间为 495 分钟,中位失血量为 200 毫升。87%的患者实现了R0切除。切除的淋巴结中位数为 26 个。术后出现 Clavien-Dindo≥3 并发症的患者有 9 例(29%)。4名患者(13%)需要再次手术。5例(16%)患者出现吻合口漏,9例(29%)患者出现肺炎。住院时间中位数为 9 天。一名患者在术后死亡。30天和90天的死亡率分别为0%和3.2%:我们的初步经验表明,RAMIE 是一种安全的手术方法,我们认为该方法在本院的实施是成功的。在克服了学习曲线后,我们希望能缩短手术时间,增加患者的医疗获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信