Biportal robotic pulmonary lobectomy, initial experience - case report.

Q4 Medicine
J Kolařík, J Tavandžis, R Novysedlák, J Vachtenheim, M Švorcová, J Pozniak, J Šimonek, J Schützner, R Lischke
{"title":"Biportal robotic pulmonary lobectomy, initial experience - case report.","authors":"J Kolařík, J Tavandžis, R Novysedlák, J Vachtenheim, M Švorcová, J Pozniak, J Šimonek, J Schützner, R Lischke","doi":"10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.430-432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thanks to perfect visualization and high maneuverability of instruments, the robotic technique is a preferable type of lung resection, even though the number of required incisions is usually higher compared to the video-assisted approach. This case report presents our initial experience with the reduced-port approach in performing robotic biportal lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>The 72-years-old female, examined for hemoptysis, was diagnosed with a carcinoid tumor of the left lower lobe bronchus based on bronchoscopy. The patient underwent a biportal fully robotic left lower lobectomy. The time of operation was 235 minutes, longer compared to the average time of multiportal procedures, i.e. 190±52 minutes, and the blood loss of 100 mL was higher compared to 43±54 mL. The patient was discharged without complications on the third postoperative day. Histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of a typical carcinoid with tumor free margins and seven tumor free lymph nodes. The patient continues to be followed at the Department of Pneumology, showing no signs of disease recurrence for eight months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic biportal approach offers a reduction in chest wall traumatization while maintaining oncological radicality. Although this approach is safe and feasible, limitations in instrument movements necessitate specific training.</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"102 11","pages":"430-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.430-432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thanks to perfect visualization and high maneuverability of instruments, the robotic technique is a preferable type of lung resection, even though the number of required incisions is usually higher compared to the video-assisted approach. This case report presents our initial experience with the reduced-port approach in performing robotic biportal lobectomy.

Case report: The 72-years-old female, examined for hemoptysis, was diagnosed with a carcinoid tumor of the left lower lobe bronchus based on bronchoscopy. The patient underwent a biportal fully robotic left lower lobectomy. The time of operation was 235 minutes, longer compared to the average time of multiportal procedures, i.e. 190±52 minutes, and the blood loss of 100 mL was higher compared to 43±54 mL. The patient was discharged without complications on the third postoperative day. Histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of a typical carcinoid with tumor free margins and seven tumor free lymph nodes. The patient continues to be followed at the Department of Pneumology, showing no signs of disease recurrence for eight months.

Conclusion: The robotic biportal approach offers a reduction in chest wall traumatization while maintaining oncological radicality. Although this approach is safe and feasible, limitations in instrument movements necessitate specific training.

双门机器人肺叶切除术,初步经验--病例报告。
导言:尽管与视频辅助方法相比,机器人技术所需的切口数量通常较多,但由于其完美的可视性和器械的高可操作性,机器人技术是肺切除术的首选类型。本病例报告介绍了我们使用缩孔方法进行机器人双肺叶切除术的初步经验:72岁的女性患者因咯血接受检查,根据支气管镜检查确诊为左下叶支气管类癌。患者接受了双入口全机器人左肺下叶切除术。手术时间为235分钟,长于多入口手术的平均时间(190±52分钟),失血量为100毫升,高于多入口手术的平均失血量(43±54毫升)。患者在术后第三天无并发症出院。组织学分析确诊为典型类癌,肿瘤边缘无肿瘤,7个淋巴结无肿瘤。患者继续在肺病科接受随访,八个月来没有出现疾病复发的迹象:结论:机器人双门方法在保持肿瘤根治性的同时,减少了胸壁创伤。虽然这种方法安全可行,但由于器械运动的限制,有必要进行专门培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信