CT angiography prior to endovascular procedures: can artificial intelligence improve reporting?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Enrico Boninsegna, Stefano Piffer, Emilio Simonini, Michele Romano, Corrado Lettieri, Stefano Colopi, Giampietro Barai
{"title":"CT angiography prior to endovascular procedures: can artificial intelligence improve reporting?","authors":"Enrico Boninsegna, Stefano Piffer, Emilio Simonini, Michele Romano, Corrado Lettieri, Stefano Colopi, Giampietro Barai","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01393-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CT angiography prior to endovascular aortic surgery is the standard non-invasive imaging method for evaluation of aortic dimensions and access sites. A detailed report is crucial to a proper planning. We assessed Artificial Intelligence (AI)-algorithm accuracy to measure vessels diameters at CT prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT scans of 50 patients were included. Two Radiologists with experience in vascular imaging together manually assessed diameters at nine landmark positions according to the American Heart Association guidelines: 450 values were obtained. We implemented TOST (Two One-Sided Test) to determine whether the measurements were equivalent to the values obtained from the AI algorithm. When the equivalence bound was a range of ± 2 mm the test showed equivalence for every point; if the range was equal to ± 1 mm the two measurements were not equivalent in 6 points out of 9 (p-value > 0.05), close to the aortic valve. The time for automatic evaluation (average 1 min 47 s) was significantly lower compared with manual measurements (5 min 41 s) (p < 0.01). In conclusion, our results indicate that AI-algorithms can measure aortic diameters at CT prior to endovascular surgery with high accuracy. AI-assisted reporting promises high efficiency, reduced inter-reader variabilities and time saving. In order to perform optimal TAVI procedure planning aortic root analysis could be improved, including annulus dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01393-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CT angiography prior to endovascular aortic surgery is the standard non-invasive imaging method for evaluation of aortic dimensions and access sites. A detailed report is crucial to a proper planning. We assessed Artificial Intelligence (AI)-algorithm accuracy to measure vessels diameters at CT prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT scans of 50 patients were included. Two Radiologists with experience in vascular imaging together manually assessed diameters at nine landmark positions according to the American Heart Association guidelines: 450 values were obtained. We implemented TOST (Two One-Sided Test) to determine whether the measurements were equivalent to the values obtained from the AI algorithm. When the equivalence bound was a range of ± 2 mm the test showed equivalence for every point; if the range was equal to ± 1 mm the two measurements were not equivalent in 6 points out of 9 (p-value > 0.05), close to the aortic valve. The time for automatic evaluation (average 1 min 47 s) was significantly lower compared with manual measurements (5 min 41 s) (p < 0.01). In conclusion, our results indicate that AI-algorithms can measure aortic diameters at CT prior to endovascular surgery with high accuracy. AI-assisted reporting promises high efficiency, reduced inter-reader variabilities and time saving. In order to perform optimal TAVI procedure planning aortic root analysis could be improved, including annulus dimensions.

血管内手术前的 CT 血管造影:人工智能能否改进报告?
血管内主动脉手术前的 CT 血管造影是评估主动脉尺寸和入路部位的标准无创成像方法。一份详细的报告对于正确规划至关重要。我们评估了人工智能(AI)算法在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)前通过 CT 测量血管直径的准确性。共纳入 50 名患者的 CT 扫描。两位在血管成像方面经验丰富的放射科医生根据美国心脏协会的指南,共同手动评估了九个标志性位置的直径:共获得 450 个值。我们进行了 TOST(双单侧测试),以确定测量值是否与人工智能算法得出的值相等。当等值范围为± 2 毫米时,测试表明每个点都是等值的;如果等值范围等于± 1 毫米,则在靠近主动脉瓣的 9 个点中,有 6 个点的测量结果是不等值的(P 值 > 0.05)。与手动测量(5 分 41 秒)相比,自动评估的时间(平均 1 分 47 秒)明显缩短(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信