Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) physical function questionnaire in late-onset Pompe disease using PROPEL phase 3 data.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Priya S Kishnani, Simon Shohet, Syed Raza, Noemi Hummel, Jeffrey P Castelli, Sheela Sitaraman Das, Heng Jiang, Agnieszka Kopiec, Ian Keyzor, Andreas Hahn
{"title":"Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS<sup>®</sup>) physical function questionnaire in late-onset Pompe disease using PROPEL phase 3 data.","authors":"Priya S Kishnani, Simon Shohet, Syed Raza, Noemi Hummel, Jeffrey P Castelli, Sheela Sitaraman Das, Heng Jiang, Agnieszka Kopiec, Ian Keyzor, Andreas Hahn","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00686-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The construct validity and interpretation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS<sup>®</sup>) Physical Function short form 20a (PF20a) questionnaire were evaluated for patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), a rare, autosomal recessive, progressive neuromuscular disorder treatable by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the phase 3 PROPEL study, adults with LOPD underwent testing of physical functioning and had PRO measurements at baseline and at weeks 12, 26, 38, and 52 while receiving experimental or standard-of-care ERT. All patients were pooled for analyses, without comparisons between treatment groups. Associations and correlations between PROMIS PF20a scores and the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), manual muscle test (MMT) of the lower extremities, Gait, Stairs, Gowers' maneuver, Chair (GSGC) score, and Rasch-built Pompe-specific Activity (R-PAct) scale were evaluated by calculating regression coefficients in linear regression models and Pearson correlation coefficients (R); patients' age, sex, race, ERT prior to study, body mass index, and study treatment were included as covariables. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of PROMIS PF20a was determined using distribution- and anchor-based methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>123 patients received at least 1 dose of ERT. In multivariable analyses, PROMIS PF20a scores had strong correlations with R-PAct scores (R = 0.83 at baseline and R = 0.67 when evaluating changes between baseline and 52 weeks) and moderate correlations with the 6MWD (R = 0.57 at baseline and R = 0.48 when evaluating changes between baseline and 52 weeks). Moderate correlations were also observed between PROMIS PF20a and MMT (R = 0.54), GSGC (R=-0.51), and FVC (R = 0.48) at baseline. In multivariable linear regression models, associations were significant between PROMIS PF20a and 6MWD (P = 0.0006), MMT (P = 0.0034), GSGC (P = 0.0278), and R-PAct (P < 0.0001) at baseline, between PROMIS PF20a and 6MWD (P < 0.0001), FVC (P = 0.0490), and R-PAct (P < 0.0001) when combining all measurements, and between PF20a and 6MWD (P = 0.0016) and R-PAct (P = 0.0001) when evaluating changes in scores between baseline and 52 weeks. The anchor-based and distribution-based MCID for a clinically important improvement for PROMIS PF20a were 2.4 and 4.2, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PROMIS PF20a has validity as an instrument both to measure and to longitudinally follow physical function in patients with LOPD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03729362. Registered 2 November 2018, https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/search?term=NCT03729362 .</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10830974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00686-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The construct validity and interpretation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Physical Function short form 20a (PF20a) questionnaire were evaluated for patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), a rare, autosomal recessive, progressive neuromuscular disorder treatable by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

Methods: In the phase 3 PROPEL study, adults with LOPD underwent testing of physical functioning and had PRO measurements at baseline and at weeks 12, 26, 38, and 52 while receiving experimental or standard-of-care ERT. All patients were pooled for analyses, without comparisons between treatment groups. Associations and correlations between PROMIS PF20a scores and the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), manual muscle test (MMT) of the lower extremities, Gait, Stairs, Gowers' maneuver, Chair (GSGC) score, and Rasch-built Pompe-specific Activity (R-PAct) scale were evaluated by calculating regression coefficients in linear regression models and Pearson correlation coefficients (R); patients' age, sex, race, ERT prior to study, body mass index, and study treatment were included as covariables. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of PROMIS PF20a was determined using distribution- and anchor-based methods.

Results: 123 patients received at least 1 dose of ERT. In multivariable analyses, PROMIS PF20a scores had strong correlations with R-PAct scores (R = 0.83 at baseline and R = 0.67 when evaluating changes between baseline and 52 weeks) and moderate correlations with the 6MWD (R = 0.57 at baseline and R = 0.48 when evaluating changes between baseline and 52 weeks). Moderate correlations were also observed between PROMIS PF20a and MMT (R = 0.54), GSGC (R=-0.51), and FVC (R = 0.48) at baseline. In multivariable linear regression models, associations were significant between PROMIS PF20a and 6MWD (P = 0.0006), MMT (P = 0.0034), GSGC (P = 0.0278), and R-PAct (P < 0.0001) at baseline, between PROMIS PF20a and 6MWD (P < 0.0001), FVC (P = 0.0490), and R-PAct (P < 0.0001) when combining all measurements, and between PF20a and 6MWD (P = 0.0016) and R-PAct (P = 0.0001) when evaluating changes in scores between baseline and 52 weeks. The anchor-based and distribution-based MCID for a clinically important improvement for PROMIS PF20a were 2.4 and 4.2, respectively.

Conclusions: PROMIS PF20a has validity as an instrument both to measure and to longitudinally follow physical function in patients with LOPD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03729362. Registered 2 November 2018, https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov/search?term=NCT03729362 .

利用 PROPEL 第 3 阶段数据验证晚发型庞贝氏症患者报告结果测量信息系统 (PROMIS®) 身体功能问卷。
背景:晚发型庞贝氏症(LOPD)是一种罕见的常染色体隐性进行性神经肌肉疾病,可通过酶替代疗法(ERT)治疗:在 PROPEL 3 期研究中,患有 LOPD 的成人患者在接受试验性或标准护理型 ERT 治疗期间接受了身体功能测试,并在基线和第 12、26、38 和 52 周进行了 PRO 测量。所有患者都集中在一起进行分析,治疗组之间不进行比较。通过计算线性回归模型中的回归系数和皮尔逊相关系数 (R),评估了 PROMIS PF20a 评分与 6 分钟步行距离 (6MWD)、预测强迫生命容量百分比 (FVC)、下肢徒手肌肉测试 (MMT)、步态、台阶、高尔氏动作、椅子 (GSGC) 评分以及 Rasch 构建的庞贝特异性活动 (R-PAct) 量表之间的关联性和相关性;患者的年龄、性别、种族、研究前的 ERT、体重指数和研究治疗被列为协变量。使用基于分布和锚的方法确定了 PROMIS PF20a 的最小临床重要差异(MCID):123名患者接受了至少1次ERT治疗。在多变量分析中,PROMIS PF20a评分与R-PAct评分有很强的相关性(基线时的相关性为0.83,评估基线与52周之间的变化时的相关性为0.67),与6MWD有中等程度的相关性(基线时的相关性为0.57,评估基线与52周之间的变化时的相关性为0.48)。PROMIS PF20a 与基线时的 MMT(R = 0.54)、GSGC(R=-0.51)和 FVC(R = 0.48)之间也存在中度相关性。在多变量线性回归模型中,PROMIS PF20a 与 6MWD (P = 0.0006)、MMT (P = 0.0034)、GSGC (P = 0.0278) 和 R-PAct (P 结论:PROMIS PF20a 具有显著的相关性:PROMIS PF20a作为测量和纵向跟踪LOPD患者身体功能的工具具有有效性:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03729362。2018年11月2日注册,https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov/search?term=NCT03729362 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信