Does Including Facebook Training Improve the Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1177/02692155241228832
S Rute-Pérez, C Rodríguez-Domínguez, E M Sánchez-Lara, M Pérez-García, A Caracuel
{"title":"Does Including Facebook Training Improve the Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training? A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"S Rute-Pérez, C Rodríguez-Domínguez, E M Sánchez-Lara, M Pérez-García, A Caracuel","doi":"10.1177/02692155241228832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether implementing a Facebook training program improves the effectiveness of computerized cognitive training (CCT) in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, double single-blind trial with parallel groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community centers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Eighty-six adults between 60 and 90 years old.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Nine face-to-face 60-min sessions of CCT with VIRTRAEL for all participants. The experimental group received an additional 30 min of Facebook training per session.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Attention (d2 Test of Attention); learning and verbal memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised); working memory (Letter-Number Sequencing test), semantic and abstract reasoning (Similarities and Matrix Reasoning tests); and planning (Key Search test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant Group*Time interaction in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised-Trial 3, Letter-Number sequencing, and Matrix tests. Between groups, post-hoc analyses showed a difference in Matrix reasoning (<i>p</i> < .001; <i>d</i>  =  0.893) at post-intervention in favor of the experimental group. Significant main effects of time were found in the CCT group between baseline and 3-month follow-up for Concentration (F  =  26.431, <i>p</i> ≤ .001), Letters and Numbers (F  =  30.549, <i>p</i> ≤ .001), Learning (F  =  38.678, <i>p</i> ≤ .001), Similarities (F  =  69.885, <i>p</i> ≤ .001), Matrix (F  =  90.342, <i>p</i> ≤ .001), and Key Search (F  =  7.904, <i>p</i>  =  .006) tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The utilization of CCT with VIRTRAEL, a freely accessible tool with broad applicability, resulted in enhanced attention, verbal learning, working memory, abstract and semantic reasoning, and planning among older adults. These improvements were sustained for at least three months post-training. Additional training in Facebook did not enhance the effectiveness of CCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"783-792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241228832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether implementing a Facebook training program improves the effectiveness of computerized cognitive training (CCT) in older adults.

Design: Randomized, controlled, double single-blind trial with parallel groups.

Setting: Community centers.

Subjects: Eighty-six adults between 60 and 90 years old.

Interventions: Nine face-to-face 60-min sessions of CCT with VIRTRAEL for all participants. The experimental group received an additional 30 min of Facebook training per session.

Main measures: Attention (d2 Test of Attention); learning and verbal memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised); working memory (Letter-Number Sequencing test), semantic and abstract reasoning (Similarities and Matrix Reasoning tests); and planning (Key Search test).

Results: There was a significant Group*Time interaction in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised-Trial 3, Letter-Number sequencing, and Matrix tests. Between groups, post-hoc analyses showed a difference in Matrix reasoning (p < .001; d  =  0.893) at post-intervention in favor of the experimental group. Significant main effects of time were found in the CCT group between baseline and 3-month follow-up for Concentration (F  =  26.431, p ≤ .001), Letters and Numbers (F  =  30.549, p ≤ .001), Learning (F  =  38.678, p ≤ .001), Similarities (F  =  69.885, p ≤ .001), Matrix (F  =  90.342, p ≤ .001), and Key Search (F  =  7.904, p  =  .006) tests.

Conclusions: The utilization of CCT with VIRTRAEL, a freely accessible tool with broad applicability, resulted in enhanced attention, verbal learning, working memory, abstract and semantic reasoning, and planning among older adults. These improvements were sustained for at least three months post-training. Additional training in Facebook did not enhance the effectiveness of CCT.

加入 Facebook 训练是否能提高计算机化认知训练的效果?随机对照试验
目的确定在老年人中实施 Facebook 训练计划是否能提高计算机化认知训练(CCT)的效果:环境:社区中心:受试者86名年龄在60至90岁之间的成年人:所有参与者均接受九次面对面 60 分钟的 VIRTRAEL CCT 治疗。实验组每次额外接受 30 分钟的 Facebook 培训:主要测量指标:注意力(d2 注意力测试);学习和言语记忆(霍普金斯言语学习测试-修订版);工作记忆(字母-数字排序测试)、语义和抽象推理(相似性和矩阵推理测试);以及计划性(关键搜索测试):霍普金斯言语学习测验-修订版-试验 3、字母-数字排序和矩阵推理测验中存在明显的 "组别*时间 "交互作用。组间事后分析表明,干预后实验组的矩阵推理能力更胜一筹(p d = 0.893)。在基线和 3 个月随访期间,CCT 组在集中力(F = 26.431,p ≤ .001)、字母和数字(F = 30.549,p ≤ .001)、学习(F = 38.678,p ≤ .001)、相似性(F = 69.885,p ≤ .001)、矩阵(F = 90.342,p ≤ .001)和关键搜索(F = 7.904,p = .006)测试:VIRTRAEL 是一种可免费使用的工具,具有广泛的适用性。通过使用 VIRTRAEL 的 CCT,老年人的注意力、语言学习能力、工作记忆、抽象和语义推理能力以及计划能力都得到了提高。这些改善在培训后至少持续了三个月。在 Facebook 上的额外培训并没有提高 CCT 的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信