Racial Disparities in Pelvic Floor Disorders.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006221
Carlotta Sarzo, Nur Nurmahomed, Charlotte Ralston, Carlene Igbedioh, Alexis Schizas, Alison Hainsworth, Linda Ferrari
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Pelvic Floor Disorders.","authors":"Carlotta Sarzo, Nur Nurmahomed, Charlotte Ralston, Carlene Igbedioh, Alexis Schizas, Alison Hainsworth, Linda Ferrari","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of racial disparities and socioeconomic status on pelvic floor disorder (PFD) care.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial disparities in colorectal PFD remain uninvestigated, despite prior research in urogynecology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital of London in 2023. Patients with colorectal PFD from 2013 to 2018 were evaluated. Patients were classified according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores and divided into quintiles. The lowest quintile represents the most deprived, whereas the higher quintile represents the least deprived. Assessed variables are: patient complaints, symptoms, consultant and biofeedback referrals, investigations, multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) discussions, treatment, and follow-up appointments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2001 patients were considered. A total of 1126 patients were initially analyzed, and 875 patients were excluded owing to incomplete data. Eight ethnic groups were identified in this study. Constipation was the most common complaint across ethnic groups ( P = 0.03). Diagnostics, MDM discussions, and conservative treatment did not vary among ethnicities. White British and Asian patients were significantly more likely to be seen by a consultant ( P = 0.001) and undergo surgery ( P = 0.002). In the second part of the study, the IMD was calculated for 1992 patients who were categorized into quintiles. Diagnostic tests, discussion in MDM, consultant review, and surgical treatments were significantly lower in the 2 lowest quintiles ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.02, and P = 0.02, respectively). Conservative treatment did not vary between the IMD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal PFD exist among ethnic minorities and patients of low socioeconomic status. This study allows for the replication of service provision frameworks in other affected areas to minimize inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"979-985"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of racial disparities and socioeconomic status on pelvic floor disorder (PFD) care.

Background: Racial disparities in colorectal PFD remain uninvestigated, despite prior research in urogynecology.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital of London in 2023. Patients with colorectal PFD from 2013 to 2018 were evaluated. Patients were classified according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores and divided into quintiles. The lowest quintile represents the most deprived, whereas the higher quintile represents the least deprived. Assessed variables are: patient complaints, symptoms, consultant and biofeedback referrals, investigations, multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) discussions, treatment, and follow-up appointments.

Results: A total of 2001 patients were considered. A total of 1126 patients were initially analyzed, and 875 patients were excluded owing to incomplete data. Eight ethnic groups were identified in this study. Constipation was the most common complaint across ethnic groups ( P = 0.03). Diagnostics, MDM discussions, and conservative treatment did not vary among ethnicities. White British and Asian patients were significantly more likely to be seen by a consultant ( P = 0.001) and undergo surgery ( P = 0.002). In the second part of the study, the IMD was calculated for 1992 patients who were categorized into quintiles. Diagnostic tests, discussion in MDM, consultant review, and surgical treatments were significantly lower in the 2 lowest quintiles ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.02, and P = 0.02, respectively). Conservative treatment did not vary between the IMD groups.

Conclusions: Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal PFD exist among ethnic minorities and patients of low socioeconomic status. This study allows for the replication of service provision frameworks in other affected areas to minimize inequalities.

盆底障碍的种族差异。
目的:调查种族差异和社会经济地位(SES)对盆底疾病护理的影响:调查种族差异和社会经济地位(SES)对盆底障碍(PFD)护理的影响:尽管以前在泌尿妇科方面进行过研究,但结肠直肠盆底疾病的种族差异仍未得到调查:这项回顾性研究于 2023 年在伦敦盖伊和圣托马斯医院进行。对 2013 年至 2018 年的结直肠 PFD 患者进行了评估。根据多重贫困指数(IMD)得分对患者进行分类,并将其分为五等分。最低的五分位数代表最贫困,而较高的五分位数代表最不贫困。评估变量:患者主诉、症状、顾问和生物反馈转诊、检查、多学科会议(MDM)讨论、治疗和复诊。共对 1126 名患者进行了初步分析,其中 875 名患者因数据不完整而被排除。本研究确定了八个种族群体。便秘是各民族中最常见的顺应症(P=0,03)。诊断、MDM 讨论和保守治疗在不同种族之间没有差异。英国白人和亚裔患者接受顾问诊治(P=0.001)和手术治疗(P=0.002)的几率明显更高。研究的第二部分计算了 1992 名患者的 IMD,并将其分为五等分。诊断检测、MDM 讨论、顾问审查和手术治疗在最低的两个五分位数中明显较低(PConclusions:在少数族裔和社会经济地位较低的患者中,结肠直肠癌 PFD 的诊断和治疗存在差异。这项研究有助于在其他受影响地区推广服务提供框架,以尽量减少不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信