Comparative evaluation of remineralization potential of four different remineralization agents on human enamel: An in vitro study

Giftlin Denny Xavier, George Thomas, Sunil Jose, V. J. Vivek, Kanimozhi Selvam, Ashish Ramakrishnan
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of remineralization potential of four different remineralization agents on human enamel: An in vitro study","authors":"Giftlin Denny Xavier, George Thomas, Sunil Jose, V. J. Vivek, Kanimozhi Selvam, Ashish Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.4103/jcde.jcde_113_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The study aimed to assess the remineralizing potential of four different commercially available agents using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, and Vickers Microhardness (VMH) Test.\n \n \n \n Forty-four specimens (n = 11 per group) were prepared from extracted teeth. A window of 6 mm × 4 mm was made on all the specimens that represented three zones, namely, sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and remineralized enamel. The zone for demineralized enamel was subjected to four different remineralizing agents; casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF), tricalcium phosphate fluoride (TCP-F), calcium sucrose phosphate (CSP), and self-assembling peptide (P11-4). Remineralization (REM) was assessed using VMH; the structural changes were assessed using SEM that was analyzed using EDX analysis. The specimens were subjected to a newer regimen of demineralization. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used with a level of significance at P ≤ 0.05.\n \n \n \n There were no significant differences in VMH between the groups for sound enamel (P = 0.472) and demineralized enamel (P = 0.116). VMH was statistically significantly more for P11-4 and the least for CPP-ACPF (P = 0.011). A post hoc analysis revealed higher VMH for P11-4 compared to CPP-ACPF (P = 0.014) and TCP-F (P = 0.035). SEM showed a homogeneous layer of minerals for all groups except CPP-ACPF. TCP-F reported a higher degree of REM, followed by P11-4 as assessed using EDX analysis.\n \n \n \n Self-assembling peptide (P11-4) exhibited a higher degree of REM than other remineralizing agents followed by CSP.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_113_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the remineralizing potential of four different commercially available agents using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, and Vickers Microhardness (VMH) Test. Forty-four specimens (n = 11 per group) were prepared from extracted teeth. A window of 6 mm × 4 mm was made on all the specimens that represented three zones, namely, sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and remineralized enamel. The zone for demineralized enamel was subjected to four different remineralizing agents; casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF), tricalcium phosphate fluoride (TCP-F), calcium sucrose phosphate (CSP), and self-assembling peptide (P11-4). Remineralization (REM) was assessed using VMH; the structural changes were assessed using SEM that was analyzed using EDX analysis. The specimens were subjected to a newer regimen of demineralization. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used with a level of significance at P ≤ 0.05. There were no significant differences in VMH between the groups for sound enamel (P = 0.472) and demineralized enamel (P = 0.116). VMH was statistically significantly more for P11-4 and the least for CPP-ACPF (P = 0.011). A post hoc analysis revealed higher VMH for P11-4 compared to CPP-ACPF (P = 0.014) and TCP-F (P = 0.035). SEM showed a homogeneous layer of minerals for all groups except CPP-ACPF. TCP-F reported a higher degree of REM, followed by P11-4 as assessed using EDX analysis. Self-assembling peptide (P11-4) exhibited a higher degree of REM than other remineralizing agents followed by CSP.
四种不同再矿化剂对人体珐琅质再矿化潜力的比较评估:体外研究
该研究旨在使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、能量色散 X 射线(EDX)分析和维氏硬度(VMH)测试评估四种不同市售制剂的再矿化潜力。 从拔出的牙齿上制备了 44 个标本(每组 11 个)。在所有试样上开出一个 6 mm × 4 mm 的窗口,代表三个区域,即健全釉质、脱矿釉质和再矿化釉质。脱矿釉质区使用了四种不同的再矿化剂:酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙氟化物(CPP-ACPF)、磷酸三钙氟化物(TCP-F)、蔗糖磷酸钙(CSP)和自组装肽(P11-4)。使用 VMH 评估再矿化 (REM);使用扫描电镜评估结构变化,并使用 EDX 分析。对标本进行了较新的脱矿化处理。采用单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验,显著性水平为 P ≤0.05。 健全釉质(P = 0.472)和脱矿釉质(P = 0.116)组间的 VMH 无明显差异。在统计学上,P11-4 的 VMH 明显更高,而 CPP-ACPF 的 VMH 最低(P = 0.011)。事后分析显示,P11-4 的 VMH 比 CPP-ACPF (P = 0.014)和 TCP-F (P = 0.035)高。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)显示,除 CPP-ACPF 外,所有组的矿物质层都很均匀。根据 EDX 分析,TCP-F 的 REM 程度更高,其次是 P11-4。 与其他再矿化剂相比,自组装肽(P11-4)的再矿化程度更高,其次是 CSP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信