Comparative evaluation of stress distribution against the root canal wall at three different levels using novel NiTi rotary files – A finite element analysis

Rimjhim Singh, Sandeep Dubey, Palak Singh, P. Samant, S. Saha
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of stress distribution against the root canal wall at three different levels using novel NiTi rotary files – A finite element analysis","authors":"Rimjhim Singh, Sandeep Dubey, Palak Singh, P. Samant, S. Saha","doi":"10.4103/jcde.jcde_96_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Recent innovations in the physical and mechanical features of endodontic file systems have diminished the prospect of stress generation and fracture risk in novel endodontic files.\n \n \n \n The purpose of this research was to comparatively evaluate the stress distribution of recently introduced endodontic rotary files with distinct features and metallurgy at three different levels of the root canal wall by finite element analysis.\n \n \n \n Forty endodontic files were used in this experiment after being inspected through a scanning electron microscope for any surface deformities. Based on their metallurgy and design, the scanned files were divided into four groups, each with 10 samples: Group A-2Shape files, Group B-F360, Group C-One Curve, and Group D-TruNatomy. To assess the mechanical behavior of these files, the stress produced by computer-aided models of these instruments on the dentinal wall of a simulated root canal was numerically analyzed using ANSYS® 15 Workbench finite element software.\n \n \n \n A one-way ANOVA was used to assess all the raw data with post hoc Tukey analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test, and Levene’s test. F360 files exerted the maximum stress on the dentinal wall, while TruNatomy files exerted the least stress at all the distinct levels of dentinal walls.\n \n \n \n There was no statistically significant variation in the stress generated between the four groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that improvements in rotary file design and metallurgy have the potential to reduce the stress during canal shaping and the risk of instrument breakage during clinical use.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":"57 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_96_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent innovations in the physical and mechanical features of endodontic file systems have diminished the prospect of stress generation and fracture risk in novel endodontic files. The purpose of this research was to comparatively evaluate the stress distribution of recently introduced endodontic rotary files with distinct features and metallurgy at three different levels of the root canal wall by finite element analysis. Forty endodontic files were used in this experiment after being inspected through a scanning electron microscope for any surface deformities. Based on their metallurgy and design, the scanned files were divided into four groups, each with 10 samples: Group A-2Shape files, Group B-F360, Group C-One Curve, and Group D-TruNatomy. To assess the mechanical behavior of these files, the stress produced by computer-aided models of these instruments on the dentinal wall of a simulated root canal was numerically analyzed using ANSYS® 15 Workbench finite element software. A one-way ANOVA was used to assess all the raw data with post hoc Tukey analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test, and Levene’s test. F360 files exerted the maximum stress on the dentinal wall, while TruNatomy files exerted the least stress at all the distinct levels of dentinal walls. There was no statistically significant variation in the stress generated between the four groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that improvements in rotary file design and metallurgy have the potential to reduce the stress during canal shaping and the risk of instrument breakage during clinical use.
使用新型镍钛旋转锉对三个不同层次根管壁应力分布的比较评估 - 有限元分析
最近在根管治疗锉系统的物理和机械特征方面的创新减少了新型根管治疗锉产生应力和断裂风险的可能性。 本研究的目的是通过有限元分析,比较评估最近推出的具有不同特征和冶金学特性的根管治疗旋转锉在根管壁三个不同层次上的应力分布。 通过扫描电子显微镜检查根管锉表面是否有任何变形后,本实验使用了 40 把根管锉。根据锉的冶金和设计,扫描后的锉被分为四组,每组 10 个样本:A 组-2 形状锉、B 组-F360、C 组-一条曲线和 D 组-解剖学。为了评估这些锉的机械性能,使用 ANSYS® 15 Workbench 有限元软件对这些器械的计算机辅助模型在模拟根管的牙本质壁上产生的应力进行了数值分析。 采用单因素方差分析评估所有原始数据,并进行事后 Tukey 分析、Shapiro-Wilk 检验和 Levene 检验。F360锉对牙本质壁产生的应力最大,而TruNatomy锉对所有不同层次的牙本质壁产生的应力最小。 四组之间产生的应力没有明显的统计学差异。因此,可以得出这样的结论:旋转锉设计和冶金学的改进有可能在临床使用中减少牙管成型过程中的应力和器械破损的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信