A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Lower Extremity Traumatic Reconstruction. Does the Muscle Matter?

Idean Roohani , Katelyn Kondra , Eloise Stanton , Jacob A. Becerra , Ishani D. Premaratne , David A. Daar , Joseph N. Carey
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Lower Extremity Traumatic Reconstruction. Does the Muscle Matter?","authors":"Idean Roohani ,&nbsp;Katelyn Kondra ,&nbsp;Eloise Stanton ,&nbsp;Jacob A. Becerra ,&nbsp;Ishani D. Premaratne ,&nbsp;David A. Daar ,&nbsp;Joseph N. Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps has served as a workhorse in lower extremity reconstruction. Flap design showcases both fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocutaneous variants; the latter includes variable amounts of vastus lateralis muscle (ALT-VL). This study aims to evaluate outcomes of ALT flaps for lower extremity reconstruction at a Level 1 trauma center between ALT-FC and ALT-VL variants and assess if there is any added benefit of muscle in flap design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was conducted at Los Angeles General Medical Center (2007–2022). Demographics, medical comorbidities, injury characteristics, and outcomes were collected. Outcomes included flap necrosis, postoperative infection, and ambulatory function.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 413 flaps placed, 63 were ALT flaps, of which 43 (68.3 %) were ALT-FC and 20 (31.7 %) were ALT-VL. Patient comorbidities, defect size, and wound severity were not significantly different across cohorts. Infectious and flap outcomes were comparable between cohorts, yet significantly more patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus had osteomyelitis overall and in the ALT-FC cohort; patients with diabetes mellitus had significantly more flap complications. Flap survival was 96.8 % with 58.7 % of patients being fully ambulatory, without significance across degrees of ambulation or time to full ambulation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings demonstrated good outcomes with low rates of infection and flap loss that were comparable between both ALT-FC and ALT-VL cohorts. ALT-FC has recently been favored given decreased donor site morbidity without impaired function or infectious/flap complications. Accordingly, our findings may suggest that the addition of muscle to flap design may not be necessary for successful reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"15 ","pages":"Pages 8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X24000022/pdfft?md5=bab2ac1640afc34a016617d8548772ad&pid=1-s2.0-S2666769X24000022-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X24000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps has served as a workhorse in lower extremity reconstruction. Flap design showcases both fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocutaneous variants; the latter includes variable amounts of vastus lateralis muscle (ALT-VL). This study aims to evaluate outcomes of ALT flaps for lower extremity reconstruction at a Level 1 trauma center between ALT-FC and ALT-VL variants and assess if there is any added benefit of muscle in flap design.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted at Los Angeles General Medical Center (2007–2022). Demographics, medical comorbidities, injury characteristics, and outcomes were collected. Outcomes included flap necrosis, postoperative infection, and ambulatory function.

Results

Among 413 flaps placed, 63 were ALT flaps, of which 43 (68.3 %) were ALT-FC and 20 (31.7 %) were ALT-VL. Patient comorbidities, defect size, and wound severity were not significantly different across cohorts. Infectious and flap outcomes were comparable between cohorts, yet significantly more patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus had osteomyelitis overall and in the ALT-FC cohort; patients with diabetes mellitus had significantly more flap complications. Flap survival was 96.8 % with 58.7 % of patients being fully ambulatory, without significance across degrees of ambulation or time to full ambulation.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated good outcomes with low rates of infection and flap loss that were comparable between both ALT-FC and ALT-VL cohorts. ALT-FC has recently been favored given decreased donor site morbidity without impaired function or infectious/flap complications. Accordingly, our findings may suggest that the addition of muscle to flap design may not be necessary for successful reconstruction.

大腿前外侧皮瓣在下肢创伤重建中的回顾性队列研究。肌肉是否重要?
背景大腿外侧(ALT)皮瓣一直是下肢重建的主力。皮瓣设计有筋膜皮瓣(ALT-FC)和肌皮瓣两种变体;后者包括不同数量的大腿外侧肌(ALT-VL)。本研究旨在评估一级创伤中心的 ALT 皮瓣在 ALT-FC 和 ALT-VL 两种变体之间用于下肢重建的效果,并评估肌肉在皮瓣设计中是否有任何额外的益处。方法在洛杉矶综合医疗中心进行了一项回顾性研究(2007-2022 年)。收集了人口统计学资料、合并症、损伤特征和结果。结果在放置的413个皮瓣中,63个为ALT皮瓣,其中43个(68.3%)为ALT-FC皮瓣,20个(31.7%)为ALT-VL皮瓣。各组患者的合并症、缺损大小和伤口严重程度无明显差异。各组间的感染和皮瓣结果相当,但高血压和糖尿病患者发生骨髓炎的比例明显高于ALT-FC组;糖尿病患者的皮瓣并发症明显高于ALT-VL组。我们的研究结果表明,ALT-FC 和 ALT-VL 两组患者的感染率和皮瓣脱落率都很低,结果良好。ALT-FC 近来受到青睐,因为它降低了供体部位的发病率,同时不会损害功能或引发感染/皮瓣并发症。因此,我们的研究结果可能表明,在皮瓣设计中增加肌肉可能不是成功重建的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信