Who drive the health policy agenda in India? Actors in National Health Committees since Independence

Disha Agrawal , Parth Sharma , Vikash R. Keshri
{"title":"Who drive the health policy agenda in India? Actors in National Health Committees since Independence","authors":"Disha Agrawal ,&nbsp;Parth Sharma ,&nbsp;Vikash R. Keshri","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Health policies reflect the ideas and interests of the actors involved. The Indian Government constituted many health committees for policy recommendations on myriad issues concerning public health, ranging from tribal health to drug regulation. However, little is known about their composition and backgrounds. We reviewed these committees to map the actors and institutions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We elicited information on all relevant health committees available in the public domain. All were constituted post-independence, except two, with recommendations that remain pertinent to date. Data for chairpersons and members - their professions, gender, institutions, and location were extracted and analysed. Reliable online sources were used to collate the information.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 23 national health committees from 1943 to 2020 with available reports. There were 25 chairpersons and 316 members. All except three chairpersons were men. Among members, only 11% were women. The majority (51%) had experience working in health systems; however, most were medical doctors, with negligible representation of other cadres. We noted the centralization of location, with 44% of members based in the national capital of Delhi. Government administrators were maximally represented (55%), followed by medical academia (19%). Post-2000, we have observed slightly improved diversity across some parameters like gender (15% women vs 9% earlier) and affiliation. However, the centralization of the location to the national capital had increased (55% post-2000 vs. 39% pre-2000).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Indian health committees lack diversity in representation from multiple perspectives. Henceforth, health policymakers should prioritize including diverse social, geographical, and health systems actors to ensure equitable policymaking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000030/pdfft?md5=2b591204091744c859485973ca9fcd35&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653324000030-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Health policies reflect the ideas and interests of the actors involved. The Indian Government constituted many health committees for policy recommendations on myriad issues concerning public health, ranging from tribal health to drug regulation. However, little is known about their composition and backgrounds. We reviewed these committees to map the actors and institutions.

Methods

We elicited information on all relevant health committees available in the public domain. All were constituted post-independence, except two, with recommendations that remain pertinent to date. Data for chairpersons and members - their professions, gender, institutions, and location were extracted and analysed. Reliable online sources were used to collate the information.

Results

We identified 23 national health committees from 1943 to 2020 with available reports. There were 25 chairpersons and 316 members. All except three chairpersons were men. Among members, only 11% were women. The majority (51%) had experience working in health systems; however, most were medical doctors, with negligible representation of other cadres. We noted the centralization of location, with 44% of members based in the national capital of Delhi. Government administrators were maximally represented (55%), followed by medical academia (19%). Post-2000, we have observed slightly improved diversity across some parameters like gender (15% women vs 9% earlier) and affiliation. However, the centralization of the location to the national capital had increased (55% post-2000 vs. 39% pre-2000).

Conclusion

Indian health committees lack diversity in representation from multiple perspectives. Henceforth, health policymakers should prioritize including diverse social, geographical, and health systems actors to ensure equitable policymaking.

谁在推动印度的卫生政策议程?独立以来国家卫生委员会的参与者
导言:卫生政策反映了相关参与者的想法和利益。印度政府成立了许多卫生委员会,就从部落卫生到药品监管等众多公共卫生问题提出政策建议。然而,人们对这些委员会的组成和背景知之甚少。我们对这些委员会进行了审查,以了解其参与者和机构。除两个委员会外,所有委员会都是在独立后成立的,其提出的建议至今仍具有现实意义。我们提取并分析了主席和成员的数据--他们的职业、性别、机构和地点。我们利用可靠的在线资料来源对信息进行了整理。共有 25 位主席和 316 位成员。除三位主席外,其余均为男性。在成员中,女性仅占 11%。大多数成员(51%)都有在卫生系统工作的经验;但是,大多数成员都是医生,其他干部的代表性微乎其微。我们注意到成员的工作地点集中,44% 的成员在国家首都德里。政府行政人员所占比例最大(55%),其次是医学学术界(19%)。2000 年后,我们观察到一些参数的多样性略有改善,如性别(15% 为女性,而之前为 9%)和隶属关系。结论印度的卫生委员会缺乏多角度的多样性代表。因此,卫生决策者应优先考虑纳入不同的社会、地理和卫生系统参与者,以确保决策的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信