Straw return influences the structure and functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community in a rice-wheat rotation system

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Silong ZHAI , Junjie XIE , Zongyi TONG , Bing YANG , Weiping CHEN , Roger T. KOIDE , Yali MENG , Xiaomin HUANG , Atta Mohi Ud DIN , Changqing CHEN , Haishui YANG
{"title":"Straw return influences the structure and functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community in a rice-wheat rotation system","authors":"Silong ZHAI ,&nbsp;Junjie XIE ,&nbsp;Zongyi TONG ,&nbsp;Bing YANG ,&nbsp;Weiping CHEN ,&nbsp;Roger T. KOIDE ,&nbsp;Yali MENG ,&nbsp;Xiaomin HUANG ,&nbsp;Atta Mohi Ud DIN ,&nbsp;Changqing CHEN ,&nbsp;Haishui YANG","doi":"10.1016/j.pedsph.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Straw return is a sustainable soil fertility-building practice, which can affect soil microbial communities. However, how straw return affects arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is not well explored. Here, we studied the impacts of different straw management treatments over eight years on the structure and functioning of AMF communities in a rice-wheat rotation system. The straw management treatments included no tillage with no straw (NTNS), rotary tillage straw return (RTSR), and ditch-buried straw return (DBSR). The community structure of AMF was characterized using high-throughput sequencing, and the mycorrhizal functioning was quantified using an <em>in situ</em> mycorrhizal-suppression treatment. Different straw management treatments formed unique AMF community structure, which was closely related to changes in soil total organic carbon, available phosphorus, total nitrogen, ammonium, and nitrate. When compared with NTNS, RTSR significantly increased Shannon diversity in 0--10 cm soil layer, while DBSR increased it in 10--20 cm soil layer; DBSR significantly increased hyphal length density in the whole ploughing layer (0--20 cm), but RTSR only increased it in the subsurface soil layer (10--20 cm). The mycorrhizal responses of shoot biomass and nutrient (N and P) uptake were positive under both straw return treatments (RTSR and DBSR), but negative under NTNS. The community composition of AMF was significantly correlated to hyphal length density, and the latter was further a positive predictor for the mycorrhizal responses of plant growth and nutrient uptake. These findings suggest that straw return can affect AMF community structure and functioning, and farmers should manage mycorrhizas to strengthen their beneficial effects on crop production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49709,"journal":{"name":"Pedosphere","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 339-350"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedosphere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016024000055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw return is a sustainable soil fertility-building practice, which can affect soil microbial communities. However, how straw return affects arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is not well explored. Here, we studied the impacts of different straw management treatments over eight years on the structure and functioning of AMF communities in a rice-wheat rotation system. The straw management treatments included no tillage with no straw (NTNS), rotary tillage straw return (RTSR), and ditch-buried straw return (DBSR). The community structure of AMF was characterized using high-throughput sequencing, and the mycorrhizal functioning was quantified using an in situ mycorrhizal-suppression treatment. Different straw management treatments formed unique AMF community structure, which was closely related to changes in soil total organic carbon, available phosphorus, total nitrogen, ammonium, and nitrate. When compared with NTNS, RTSR significantly increased Shannon diversity in 0--10 cm soil layer, while DBSR increased it in 10--20 cm soil layer; DBSR significantly increased hyphal length density in the whole ploughing layer (0--20 cm), but RTSR only increased it in the subsurface soil layer (10--20 cm). The mycorrhizal responses of shoot biomass and nutrient (N and P) uptake were positive under both straw return treatments (RTSR and DBSR), but negative under NTNS. The community composition of AMF was significantly correlated to hyphal length density, and the latter was further a positive predictor for the mycorrhizal responses of plant growth and nutrient uptake. These findings suggest that straw return can affect AMF community structure and functioning, and farmers should manage mycorrhizas to strengthen their beneficial effects on crop production.

秸秆掺入影响稻麦轮作系统中的丛枝菌根真菌群落的结构和功能
秸秆还田是一种可持续的土壤肥力建设方法,会影响土壤微生物群落。然而,秸秆还田如何影响丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)还没有得到很好的探讨。在此,我们研究了八年中不同的秸秆管理处理对水稻-小麦轮作系统中AMF群落结构和功能的影响。秸秆管理处理包括无秸秆免耕(NTNS)、旋耕秸秆还田(RTSR)和沟埋秸秆还田(DBSR)。利用高通量测序对 AMF 群落结构进行了表征,并利用原位菌根抑制处理对菌根功能进行了量化。不同的秸秆管理处理形成了独特的AMF群落结构,这种群落结构与土壤全有机碳、可利用磷、全氮、铵和硝酸盐的变化密切相关。与NTNS相比,RTSR显著增加了0--10 cm土层的香农多样性,而DBSR增加了10--20 cm土层的香农多样性;DBSR显著增加了整个耕作层(0--20 cm)的菌丝长度密度,而RTSR仅增加了表层下土层(10--20 cm)的菌丝长度密度。在两种秸秆还田处理(RTSR 和 DBSR)下,菌根对嫩枝生物量和养分(氮和磷)吸收的反应均为正,而在 NTNS 下则为负。AMF 的群落组成与菌丝长度密度显著相关,而后者又是植物生长和养分吸收的菌根反应的正向预测因子。这些研究结果表明,秸秆还田会影响 AMF 的群落结构和功能,农民应该对菌根进行管理,以加强其对作物生产的有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedosphere
Pedosphere 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
5.0 months
期刊介绍: PEDOSPHERE—a peer-reviewed international journal published bimonthly in English—welcomes submissions from scientists around the world under a broad scope of topics relevant to timely, high quality original research findings, especially up-to-date achievements and advances in the entire field of soil science studies dealing with environmental science, ecology, agriculture, bioscience, geoscience, forestry, etc. It publishes mainly original research articles as well as some reviews, mini reviews, short communications and special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信