P193 Fatigued patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease exhibit distinct systemic antibody epitope repertoires

Abstract

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) frequently experience fatigue, affecting up to 80% of those with active disease and approximately 50% with quiescent disease. The exact cause of IBD-associated fatigue is often unknown, making clinical management very challenging. In this study we aimed to explore whether patients with quiescent IBD reporting fatigue exhibit specific systemic antibody responses, which could provide insight into immune reactivities underlying fatigue. Systemic antibody epitope repertoires were profiled in 327 patients with IBD (156 Crohn’s disease [CD]; 171 ulcerative colitis [UC]) leveraging phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) against 344,000 rationally selected peptide antigens. Fatigue severity was assessed on a 10-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 10 (highest fatigue severity). Quiescent IBD was defined as clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] <5 or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] <2.5) and biochemical remission (C-reactive protein [CRP] <5 mg/L) at time of sampling. Multivariable logistic regression analyses, allowing adjustment for potential confounding factors e.g. age, sex, and smoking, were performed to identify associations between fatigue and systemic antibody responses. A total of 105 different antibody-bound peptides were associated with fatigue (nominal P-value<0.05), albeit none passed adjustment for multiple comparisons. Among these antibodies, 50 (47.6%) were found to be less frequent in highly fatigued patients (fourth quartile, Q4), while 55 (52.4%) were identified as more frequent in highly fatigued patients compared to those with low fatigue scores (first quartile, Q1). Among highly fatigued patients, antibody responses were primarily directed towards viral antigens, notably several antigens from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), as well as bacterial antigens, including functional proteins from Streptococcus and Staphylococcus species. Fatigued patients with CD exhibited elevated systemic antibody responses against allergens, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Shigella spp. Fatigued patients with UC showed higher frequencies of antibody responses against herpes simplex virus (HSV), influenza viruses, and few responses against allergens and Streptococcus bacteria. These results remained materially unchanged when repeating analyses in patients with quiescent IBD. This study may suggest a potential role of viral antigens, particularly EBV, in the pathophysiology of fatigue in patients with IBD. However, larger confirmatory studies are needed to validate these findings. PhIP-Seq may represent a valuable strategy to approach the investigation of immune responses underlying complex symptoms such as fatigue.