Análisis coste/efectivo del diagnóstico de la arteritis de la temporal

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Isabel del Blanco Alonso, Álvaro Revilla Calavia, Laura Saiz-Viloria, Manuel Diez Martínez, Enrique San Norberto García, Carlos Vaquero Puerta
{"title":"Análisis coste/efectivo del diagnóstico de la arteritis de la temporal","authors":"Isabel del Blanco Alonso,&nbsp;Álvaro Revilla Calavia,&nbsp;Laura Saiz-Viloria,&nbsp;Manuel Diez Martínez,&nbsp;Enrique San Norberto García,&nbsp;Carlos Vaquero Puerta","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Temporal arteritis (TA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis. Its diagnosis is based on criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology (1990), and its treatment is high-dose corticosteroids.</p><p>Our objective is to assess the cost of diagnosing TA, and secondarily, cost-effective analysis of different diagnostic strategies (clinical, biopsy, Doppler ultrasound) and therapeutic strategies (corticosteroid suspension).</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Observational, retrospective study has been carried out on patients with TA (2012–2021). Demographic data, comorbidities, signs and symptoms suggestive of TA were collected. TA was diagnosed with a score ≥3 according to American College of Rheumatoloy criteria (ACR-SCORE). The costs of diagnosis and treatment modification were analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-five patients have been included, median age 77 (46-87) years. Headache, temporal pain and jaw claudication were significant for the diagnosis of TA.</p><p>Patients with a halo on Doppler ultrasound and a positive biopsy have significantly elevated ESR and CRP compared to patients who do not.</p><p>The cost of the TA diagnosis was 414.7 euros/patient. If we use ACR-SCORE≥3-echodoppler it is 167.2 €/patient (savings 59.6%) and ACR-SCORE≥3-biopsy 339.75 €/patient (savings 18%). If the corticosteroid was removed and a biopsy was performed, 21.6 €/patient (94.7% savings), if the corticosteroid was removed and Doppler ultrasound was performed, 10.6 €/patient (97.4% savings).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Headache, temporary pain and jaw claudication are predictors of TA. Elevated ESR and CRP are predictors of positive biopsy and presence of halo on ultrasound.</p><p>The uses of ACR-SCORE≥3 with Doppler ultrasound or biopsy, and with corticosteroid suspension, are cost-effective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X23002759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Temporal arteritis (TA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis. Its diagnosis is based on criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology (1990), and its treatment is high-dose corticosteroids.

Our objective is to assess the cost of diagnosing TA, and secondarily, cost-effective analysis of different diagnostic strategies (clinical, biopsy, Doppler ultrasound) and therapeutic strategies (corticosteroid suspension).

Material and method

Observational, retrospective study has been carried out on patients with TA (2012–2021). Demographic data, comorbidities, signs and symptoms suggestive of TA were collected. TA was diagnosed with a score ≥3 according to American College of Rheumatoloy criteria (ACR-SCORE). The costs of diagnosis and treatment modification were analysed.

Results

Seventy-five patients have been included, median age 77 (46-87) years. Headache, temporal pain and jaw claudication were significant for the diagnosis of TA.

Patients with a halo on Doppler ultrasound and a positive biopsy have significantly elevated ESR and CRP compared to patients who do not.

The cost of the TA diagnosis was 414.7 euros/patient. If we use ACR-SCORE≥3-echodoppler it is 167.2 €/patient (savings 59.6%) and ACR-SCORE≥3-biopsy 339.75 €/patient (savings 18%). If the corticosteroid was removed and a biopsy was performed, 21.6 €/patient (94.7% savings), if the corticosteroid was removed and Doppler ultrasound was performed, 10.6 €/patient (97.4% savings).

Conclusions

Headache, temporary pain and jaw claudication are predictors of TA. Elevated ESR and CRP are predictors of positive biopsy and presence of halo on ultrasound.

The uses of ACR-SCORE≥3 with Doppler ultrasound or biopsy, and with corticosteroid suspension, are cost-effective.

颞动脉炎诊断的成本效益分析
颞动脉炎(TA)是最常见的系统性血管炎。我们的目标是评估诊断颞动脉炎的成本,其次是分析不同诊断策略(临床、活检、多普勒超声)和治疗策略(皮质类固醇悬浮剂)的成本效益。研究收集了TA患者的人口统计学数据、合并症、体征和症状。根据美国风湿病学会标准(ACR-SCORE),TA 评分≥3 分即可确诊。结果共纳入 75 名患者,中位年龄为 77(46-87)岁。头痛、颞痛和下颌跛行对 TA 诊断有重要意义。多普勒超声检查有晕轮和活检阳性的患者与没有晕轮和活检阳性的患者相比,ESR 和 CRP 明显升高。如果使用 ACR-SCORE≥3-超声波,则为 167.2 欧元/人(节省 59.6%),ACR-SCORE≥3-活检为 339.75 欧元/人(节省 18%)。如果去除皮质类固醇并进行活检,21.6 欧元/人(节省 94.7%);如果去除皮质类固醇并进行多普勒超声检查,10.6 欧元/人(节省 97.4%)。ACR-SCORE≥3与多普勒超声或活检以及皮质类固醇停药的结合使用具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信