The Evaluation of Integrated Perfusion - Weighted Imaging Diffusion and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Methods Accuracy for Brain Neoplasms Diagnosis Compared to Pathology Findings

Azhar Kareem Hasan Alhusseini, Dr Vahid Changizi, PhD, Dr Atheel Saad Al-Nasrawi, Dr Kholoud Morad Mohammed, MD
{"title":"The Evaluation of Integrated Perfusion - Weighted Imaging Diffusion and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Methods Accuracy for Brain Neoplasms Diagnosis Compared to Pathology Findings","authors":"Azhar Kareem Hasan Alhusseini, Dr Vahid Changizi, PhD, Dr Atheel Saad Al-Nasrawi, Dr Kholoud Morad Mohammed, MD","doi":"10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i01/1754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: MRI has a vital role in the assessment of brain neoplasm. Conventional MRI has limited specificity. The combination of MRI using diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows more accurate assessment of the tissue microenvironment. Objective: The role of diffusion-weighted Perfusion - Weighted Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy techniques to evaluate the Accuracy of Brain Neoplasms Diagnosis. Method: This project is based on cross-sectional design. The population of this study were 80 patients with brain tumors that have been indicated for MRI test in the period of sampling which was during February 2023 to July 2023. The data-collecting technique was done by the researcher using a questionnaire, observation, and laboratory findings. The questionnaire was designed and copied by the researcher. MRI examinations was performed using MRI 1.5 T scanner (Philips MULTIVA systems) using a phase array 6 channels head coil at the radiology department. The data had encoded and then entered into the statistical program (SSPS version 26). Results: A total 80 of six equally collected group samples were investigated radiographically for brain (8, 9, 17, 31, 7, and 8 patients) respectively after the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The age of each study sample was normally distributed and ranged from 10 to 86 years without significant differences between them (P-value= 0.16). One patient out of 80 was diagnosed incorrectly when using MRS sequence. Therefore, the achieved total accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 97.61%, 100% and 87.5% respectively. The achieved p-value among study’s groups is 0.6. Although it is highly significant and accurate in the MRS procedure, additionally, the p-value when implementing the three independent sample ANOVA-test between the Choline, creatine and NAA is high significant with p value choline being 0.0001 and p-value for NAA being 0.0024 which means that there are highly significant differences between tissue brain groups. 80 patients were diagnosed correctly when using combining diffusion, perfusion and MRS sequence. Therefore, the achieved total accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 100%, 100% and 98.9% respectively. Additionally, the achieved p-value of overall diagnosing result is 0.75 which confirms that no patients failed to diagnose by combining DWI, PWI and MRS than separate protocol. Conclusion: In this study we found that it is possible to diagnose brain malignancies with a greater level of sensitivity and accuracy by combining perfusion, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). It has been found that using the CBF and CBV parameters for diagnosing brain lesions is more effective than using the MTT and TTP parameters. The NAA and Choline parameters are superior to the Creatinine parameter in terms of their ability to accurately diagnose brain lesions. The combination of DWI, MRS, and MRP predicted 100% sensitivity and Specificity 98.6% and accuracy 100% for the differentiation of the type of brain tumor. These cutting-edge MRI techniques eliminated the need for invasive treatments like transcranial biopsies.","PeriodicalId":14008,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","volume":"7 s3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i01/1754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MRI has a vital role in the assessment of brain neoplasm. Conventional MRI has limited specificity. The combination of MRI using diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows more accurate assessment of the tissue microenvironment. Objective: The role of diffusion-weighted Perfusion - Weighted Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy techniques to evaluate the Accuracy of Brain Neoplasms Diagnosis. Method: This project is based on cross-sectional design. The population of this study were 80 patients with brain tumors that have been indicated for MRI test in the period of sampling which was during February 2023 to July 2023. The data-collecting technique was done by the researcher using a questionnaire, observation, and laboratory findings. The questionnaire was designed and copied by the researcher. MRI examinations was performed using MRI 1.5 T scanner (Philips MULTIVA systems) using a phase array 6 channels head coil at the radiology department. The data had encoded and then entered into the statistical program (SSPS version 26). Results: A total 80 of six equally collected group samples were investigated radiographically for brain (8, 9, 17, 31, 7, and 8 patients) respectively after the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The age of each study sample was normally distributed and ranged from 10 to 86 years without significant differences between them (P-value= 0.16). One patient out of 80 was diagnosed incorrectly when using MRS sequence. Therefore, the achieved total accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 97.61%, 100% and 87.5% respectively. The achieved p-value among study’s groups is 0.6. Although it is highly significant and accurate in the MRS procedure, additionally, the p-value when implementing the three independent sample ANOVA-test between the Choline, creatine and NAA is high significant with p value choline being 0.0001 and p-value for NAA being 0.0024 which means that there are highly significant differences between tissue brain groups. 80 patients were diagnosed correctly when using combining diffusion, perfusion and MRS sequence. Therefore, the achieved total accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are 100%, 100% and 98.9% respectively. Additionally, the achieved p-value of overall diagnosing result is 0.75 which confirms that no patients failed to diagnose by combining DWI, PWI and MRS than separate protocol. Conclusion: In this study we found that it is possible to diagnose brain malignancies with a greater level of sensitivity and accuracy by combining perfusion, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). It has been found that using the CBF and CBV parameters for diagnosing brain lesions is more effective than using the MTT and TTP parameters. The NAA and Choline parameters are superior to the Creatinine parameter in terms of their ability to accurately diagnose brain lesions. The combination of DWI, MRS, and MRP predicted 100% sensitivity and Specificity 98.6% and accuracy 100% for the differentiation of the type of brain tumor. These cutting-edge MRI techniques eliminated the need for invasive treatments like transcranial biopsies.
评估综合灌注加权成像弥散和磁共振波谱方法与病理结果相比在脑肿瘤诊断中的准确性
背景:磁共振成像在评估脑肿瘤方面发挥着重要作用。传统磁共振成像的特异性有限。结合使用弥散加权成像、灌注加权成像和磁共振波谱成像的磁共振成像可更准确地评估组织微环境。目标:弥散加权成像的作用弥散加权灌注加权成像和磁共振波谱技术在评估脑肿瘤诊断准确性中的作用。方法:本项目采用横断面设计。研究对象为 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 7 月期间接受磁共振成像检查的 80 名脑肿瘤患者。研究人员采用问卷调查、观察和实验室结果等方法收集数据。调查问卷由研究人员设计并复制。磁共振成像检查是在放射科使用磁共振成像 1.5 T 扫描仪(飞利浦 MULTIVA 系统)和相位阵列 6 通道头部线圈进行的。数据经编码后输入统计程序(SSPS 26 版)。结果在符合纳入和排除标准后,共有 80 份 6 组样本(分别为 8、9、17、31、7 和 8 名患者)接受了脑部放射学检查。每个研究样本的年龄呈正态分布,从 10 岁到 86 岁不等,无明显差异(P 值= 0.16)。在使用 MRS 序列时,80 名患者中有一名被误诊。因此,总准确率、灵敏度和特异性分别为 97.61%、100% 和 87.5%。研究组间的 P 值为 0.6。虽然在 MRS 程序中具有高度显著性和准确性,但在胆碱、肌酸和 NAA 之间进行三个独立样本方差分析检验时,P 值也具有高度显著性,胆碱的 P 值为 0.0001,NAA 的 P 值为 0.0024,这意味着脑组织组之间存在高度显著性差异。结合弥散、灌注和 MRS 序列,80 名患者被正确诊断。因此,总准确率、灵敏度和特异性分别为 100%、100% 和 98.9%。此外,总体诊断结果的 p 值为 0.75,这证实了与单独的方案相比,联合使用 DWI、PWI 和 MRS 诊断的患者中没有失败的。结论在这项研究中,我们发现结合灌注成像、弥散加权成像(DWI)和磁共振波谱成像(MRS)诊断脑部恶性肿瘤的灵敏度和准确性更高。研究发现,使用 CBF 和 CBV 参数诊断脑部病变比使用 MTT 和 TTP 参数更有效。NAA 和胆碱参数在准确诊断脑损伤方面优于肌酐参数。结合 DWI、MRS 和 MRP 预测脑肿瘤类型的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 98.6%,准确性为 100%。这些尖端的磁共振成像技术消除了经颅活检等侵入性治疗的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信