Effects of stretching on muscle strength, endurance, and power performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.6 4区医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

Isokinetics and Exercise Science Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.3233/ies-220120

Alex Lopes Dos Reis, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Amanda Yasmin Vieira de Souza, Antonio Stabelini Neto, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira

{"title":"Effects of stretching on muscle strength, endurance, and power performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Alex Lopes Dos Reis, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Amanda Yasmin Vieira de Souza, Antonio Stabelini Neto, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira","doi":"10.3233/ies-220120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The acute and chronic effects of stretching preceding exercises on strength, power and muscular endurance are still not entirely clear in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To verify the acute and chronic effects of the main types of stretching (static, dynamic, PNF, and ballistic) on muscle strength, power, and endurance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in: PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, Science Direct, and CENTRAL. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis were performed using the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: 43 studies were included in the systematic review and 30 in the meta-analysis calculations. Only two studies showed high methodological quality. In general, static stretching had an impact on the potentiated the gain in muscle strength of the lower limbs in the long term (0.60 [0.20–1.00]). The acute (ES = 0.38 [0.05–0.70]) and long-term (ES = 1.04 [0.21–1.88]) dynamic stretching was able to potentiate the gain of muscle power in the lower limbs, while the acute PNF had an impact on the worsening of the muscular endurance (ES = 1.68 [0.83–2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: When the training objective is linked to acute effects, dynamic stretching should be prioritized before the main activity. For long-term effects, static and dynamic stretching have been shown to potentiate muscle strength and power gain, respectively, and are recommended in these cases.","PeriodicalId":54915,"journal":{"name":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-220120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The acute and chronic effects of stretching preceding exercises on strength, power and muscular endurance are still not entirely clear in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To verify the acute and chronic effects of the main types of stretching (static, dynamic, PNF, and ballistic) on muscle strength, power, and endurance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in: PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, Science Direct, and CENTRAL. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis were performed using the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: 43 studies were included in the systematic review and 30 in the meta-analysis calculations. Only two studies showed high methodological quality. In general, static stretching had an impact on the potentiated the gain in muscle strength of the lower limbs in the long term (0.60 [0.20–1.00]). The acute (ES = 0.38 [0.05–0.70]) and long-term (ES = 1.04 [0.21–1.88]) dynamic stretching was able to potentiate the gain of muscle power in the lower limbs, while the acute PNF had an impact on the worsening of the muscular endurance (ES = 1.68 [0.83–2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: When the training objective is linked to acute effects, dynamic stretching should be prioritized before the main activity. For long-term effects, static and dynamic stretching have been shown to potentiate muscle strength and power gain, respectively, and are recommended in these cases.

查看原文本刊更多论文

拉伸对肌肉力量、耐力和力量表现的影响：系统回顾和荟萃分析

背景：文献中仍未完全明确练习前拉伸对力量、功率和肌肉耐力的急性和慢性影响。目的：验证主要拉伸类型（静态、动态、PNF 和弹道）对肌力、力量和耐力的急性和慢性影响。方法：在以下网站进行了系统的文献检索：PubMed、Web of Science、LILACS、Scopus、Science Direct 和 CENTRAL。方法学质量采用 PEDro 量表进行评估。使用标准化平均差（SMD）进行元分析。结果：43 项研究被纳入系统综述，30 项研究被纳入荟萃分析计算。只有两项研究的方法质量较高。总的来说，静态拉伸对长期增强下肢肌肉力量有影响（0.60 [0.20-1.00]）。急性（ES = 0.38 [0.05-0.70]）和长期（ES = 1.04 [0.21-1.88]）动态拉伸能够增强下肢肌肉力量的增长，而急性 PNF 对肌肉耐力的恶化有影响（ES = 1.68 [0.83-2.53]）。结论：当训练目标与急性效果相关时，动态拉伸应优先于主要活动。就长期效果而言，静态拉伸和动态拉伸已被证明可分别促进肌肉力量和力量的增长，因此建议在这些情况下进行动态拉伸。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Isokinetics and Exercise Science 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

14.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Isokinetics and Exercise Science (IES) is an international journal devoted to the study of theoretical and applied aspects of human muscle performance. Since isokinetic dynamometry constitutes the major tool in this area, the journal takes a particular interest in exploring the considerable potential of this technology. IES publishes studies associated with the methodology of muscle performance especially with respect to the issues of reproducibility and validity of testing, description of normal and pathological mechanical parameters which are derivable from muscle testing, applications in basic research topics such as motor learning paradigms and electromyography. The journal also publishes studies on applications in clinical settings and technical aspects of the various measurement systems employed in human muscle performance research. The journal welcomes submissions in the form of research papers, reviews, case studies and technical reports from professionals in the fields of sports medicine, orthopaedic and neurological rehabilitation and exercise physiology.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格