Don’t waste the crisis: The COVID-19 Anthropause as an experiment for rethinking human–environment relations

A. Fiske, Isabella M. Radhuber, Consuelo Fernández Salvador, E. Araújo, M. Jasser, Gertrude Saxinger, Bettina M Zimmermann, Barbara Prainsack
{"title":"Don’t waste the crisis: The COVID-19 Anthropause as an experiment for rethinking human–environment relations","authors":"A. Fiske, Isabella M. Radhuber, Consuelo Fernández Salvador, E. Araújo, M. Jasser, Gertrude Saxinger, Bettina M Zimmermann, Barbara Prainsack","doi":"10.1177/25148486231221017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic sparked radical changes in the way life was lived around the globe. With the rapid reduction in human mobility, short-term environmental improvements were seen across the world. Work and social routines were altered, and political action to reduce case numbers seemed to open a window of opportunity for socio-environmental change in a post-pandemic world. Inspired by conversations around the “COVID-19 Anthropause,” this paper probes the lived experiences and reflections that emerged in the pandemic pause. Three years after the onset of the pandemic, many initial environmental gains have been limited. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 Anthropause has brought human–environment relations into new light, sparking introspection and forms of broader social critique surrounding what kinds of socio-political courage and structural change is necessary to achieve new post-pandemic realities. Our research shows the heterogeneity of experiences of the Anthropause, highlighting the ways that uncritical engagement with the concept can obscure overlapping structural inequalities, and reinforce harmful binaries around the presence and absence of humans in nature. Drawing on longitudinal, qualitative data from Latin America and Europe, we enrich debates over the implications of the pandemic for human–environment relations and underscore the need to attend to radical forms of difference amid any global environmental concept.","PeriodicalId":507916,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231221017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic sparked radical changes in the way life was lived around the globe. With the rapid reduction in human mobility, short-term environmental improvements were seen across the world. Work and social routines were altered, and political action to reduce case numbers seemed to open a window of opportunity for socio-environmental change in a post-pandemic world. Inspired by conversations around the “COVID-19 Anthropause,” this paper probes the lived experiences and reflections that emerged in the pandemic pause. Three years after the onset of the pandemic, many initial environmental gains have been limited. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 Anthropause has brought human–environment relations into new light, sparking introspection and forms of broader social critique surrounding what kinds of socio-political courage and structural change is necessary to achieve new post-pandemic realities. Our research shows the heterogeneity of experiences of the Anthropause, highlighting the ways that uncritical engagement with the concept can obscure overlapping structural inequalities, and reinforce harmful binaries around the presence and absence of humans in nature. Drawing on longitudinal, qualitative data from Latin America and Europe, we enrich debates over the implications of the pandemic for human–environment relations and underscore the need to attend to radical forms of difference amid any global environmental concept.
不要浪费危机:COVID-19 人类休眠期是重新思考人类与环境关系的一次实验
COVID-19 大流行引发了全球生活方式的彻底改变。随着人类流动性的迅速降低,世界各地的环境得到了短期改善。工作和社会生活方式发生了改变,减少病例数量的政治行动似乎为大流行后世界的社会环境变革打开了一扇机会之窗。受围绕 "COVID-19 人类暂停期 "对话的启发,本文探究了大流行停顿期间出现的生活经验和反思。疫情爆发三年后,许多最初的环境成果都受到了限制。尽管如此,COVID-19 人类大流行还是为人类与环境的关系带来了新的曙光,引发了更广泛的社会批判和反思,这些批判和反思围绕着什么样的社会政治勇气和结构变革才是实现大流行后新现实所必需的。我们的研究显示了人类活动停滞期经验的异质性,强调了不加批判地使用这一概念可能会掩盖重叠的结构性不平等,并强化围绕人类在自然中存在与不存在的有害二元对立。利用来自拉丁美洲和欧洲的纵向定性数据,我们丰富了关于大流行病对人类与环境关系的影响的讨论,并强调了在任何全球环境概念中关注激进的差异形式的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信