Legal Reconstruction of Suspect Investigation Based on Pancasila Justice Values

Muhammad Yasir, G. Gunarto, Bambang Tri Bawono
{"title":"Legal Reconstruction of Suspect Investigation Based on Pancasila Justice Values","authors":"Muhammad Yasir, G. Gunarto, Bambang Tri Bawono","doi":"10.36348/sijlcj.2024.v07i01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the weaknesses of the current regulations for examining suspects in Indonesia currently and to find the legal reconstruction for investigating suspects based on Pancasila values of justice. The research method used is sociological legal research or empirical legal research, using the constructivism paradigm. The approach method used in this research is social legal research. This research uses primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques through literature study, interviews, and questionnaires. The collected data was analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that the weaknesses in the legal substance of the regulations regarding the examination of suspects, namely: the Criminal Procedure Code has not regulated the legal consequences of deviations from suspects' rights to be free to provide information about investigators and the results of investigations, the Criminal Procedure Code has not regulated supervision of investigators' actions, including in examining suspects, and the Criminal Procedure Code has not regulated alleged irregularities in the examination of suspects. as the object of pretrial examination. Weaknesses in the legal structure, namely weak supervision of investigative institutions over the investigation process, limited regional police institutions in providing free legal aid, and the absence of a police budget to provide interpreters and translators for suspects, and weaknesses in legal culture, namely violations of the rights of suspects. suspects' rights, investigative engineering, individual investigators involved in bribery, and investigators who do not understand local culture. Therefore, It is necessary to reconstruct the values of justice and norms in the regulations for examining suspects so that they are based on the Pancasila values of justice. The value of Pancasila justice, especially Principle 2 of Just and Civilized Humanity, must be reflected in the provisions for examining suspects so that suspects are truly made into subjects who have dignity and respect that must be respected by investigators and protected by the state. Meanwhile, the reconstruction of norms in the regulations for examining suspects so that they are based on Pancasila values of justice, namely improvements to Articles 52, 117, 77, 79, and Article 81 of the Criminal Procedure Code.","PeriodicalId":499336,"journal":{"name":"Scholars international journal of law, crime and justice","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars international journal of law, crime and justice","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2024.v07i01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the weaknesses of the current regulations for examining suspects in Indonesia currently and to find the legal reconstruction for investigating suspects based on Pancasila values of justice. The research method used is sociological legal research or empirical legal research, using the constructivism paradigm. The approach method used in this research is social legal research. This research uses primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques through literature study, interviews, and questionnaires. The collected data was analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that the weaknesses in the legal substance of the regulations regarding the examination of suspects, namely: the Criminal Procedure Code has not regulated the legal consequences of deviations from suspects' rights to be free to provide information about investigators and the results of investigations, the Criminal Procedure Code has not regulated supervision of investigators' actions, including in examining suspects, and the Criminal Procedure Code has not regulated alleged irregularities in the examination of suspects. as the object of pretrial examination. Weaknesses in the legal structure, namely weak supervision of investigative institutions over the investigation process, limited regional police institutions in providing free legal aid, and the absence of a police budget to provide interpreters and translators for suspects, and weaknesses in legal culture, namely violations of the rights of suspects. suspects' rights, investigative engineering, individual investigators involved in bribery, and investigators who do not understand local culture. Therefore, It is necessary to reconstruct the values of justice and norms in the regulations for examining suspects so that they are based on the Pancasila values of justice. The value of Pancasila justice, especially Principle 2 of Just and Civilized Humanity, must be reflected in the provisions for examining suspects so that suspects are truly made into subjects who have dignity and respect that must be respected by investigators and protected by the state. Meanwhile, the reconstruction of norms in the regulations for examining suspects so that they are based on Pancasila values of justice, namely improvements to Articles 52, 117, 77, 79, and Article 81 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
基于潘查希拉司法价值观的嫌犯调查法律重构
本研究旨在分析印尼目前审查嫌疑人的现行法规的不足之处,并根据潘查希拉(Pancasila)的正义价值观找到调查嫌疑人的法律重建方法。本研究采用的研究方法是社会学法律研究或实证法律研究,使用的是建构主义范式。本研究采用的方法是社会法律研究。本研究使用一手数据和二手数据。数据收集技术包括文献研究、访谈和问卷调查。对收集到的数据进行了定性分析。研究结果表明,有关审查犯罪嫌疑人的规定在法律实质上存在缺陷,即:《刑事诉讼法》没有规定犯罪嫌疑人自由提供有关侦查人员和调查结果的权利出现偏差的法律后果,《刑事诉讼法》没有规定对侦查人员的行为(包括审查犯罪嫌疑人的行为)进行监督,《刑事诉讼法》没有规定对作为审前审查对象的犯罪嫌疑人进行审查时涉嫌违规的行为。法律结构的弱点,即侦查机构对侦查过程的监督薄弱,地区警察机构提供免费法律援助的能力有限,警方没有预算为嫌疑人提供口译和笔译服务;法律文化的弱点,即侵犯嫌疑人权利、侦查工程、个别侦查人员参与贿赂、侦查人员不了解当地文化。因此,有必要在审查嫌疑人的规定中重新构建司法价值观和规范,使其建立在潘查希拉司法价值观的基础之上。潘查希拉的正义价值,尤其是 "公正和文明的人性 "原则 2,必须在审查犯罪嫌疑人的规定中得到体现,使犯罪嫌疑人真正成为有尊严的主体,受到侦查人员的尊重和国家的保护。同时,重新制定审查犯罪嫌疑人的规定,使其建立在潘查希拉正义价值观的基础上,即改进《刑事诉讼法》第 52、117、77、79 条和第 81 条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信